| Search Results |
| Subject |
Author |
Forum |
Time |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
True, but I think scaling the numbers to, say, one of five levels, should reduce some of the rep-hunting. | RaceProUK | Forum & Website | 04-12-2005 at 07:56 AM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
i think the rep system is important, and should stay. [u]when not abused[/u], the reputation system helps distinguish people (such as Cookie and Sunshine among others) for their help and contribution to the community. it is sort of like getting awar... | Joa | Forum & Website | 04-12-2005 at 04:36 AM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
Tell that to the rep-obsessed people. 8-) Then they blame others because of their higher reps and stuff. And while we all know they have no control over other people. | L. Coyote | Forum & Website | 04-12-2005 at 04:05 AM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
yes it should stay but it means nothing tbh its not how people think of you realy its if they could be botherd or not to give you one i think everyone deserve at least one rep for something but i dont pay much atention to it . its a good system and s... | Pipish | Forum & Website | 04-12-2005 at 03:43 AM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
True, having a reptuation system is always going to be stating that someone is potentially better then someone else. People that are helping alot deserve the positive feedback but people that are trying their best but not getting people giving them p... | Chestah | Forum & Website | 04-12-2005 at 03:18 AM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
What would be better? There would always be different levels (and therefore the possibility of competition), and those levels would be based on numbers. | WDZ | Forum & Website | 04-12-2005 at 03:05 AM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
I'm not really advocating it's removal, but I think it'd work better if reputation wasn't a number. | RaceProUK | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 10:20 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
I'm all for disabling the reputation system. 8-) | L. Coyote | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 06:08 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
I requested this (I think it was me :P) a while back, but because it would be hastle and probably abused, then it would be ludacris to add something as this. | user27089 | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 05:30 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
Great guidelines ! (Y) | Fraisie | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 05:28 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
any chance of adding a report button to the rep box? | Stigmata | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 04:27 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
Is adding a rep in a language the person who recived the rep against the rules? I got some Dutch rep and I have no idea what it says (negative rep, my only one). | Vilkku | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 04:27 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
Well, I already have something like that, but the number is 5. Perhaps I should bump it up to 15... :dodgy: | WDZ | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 04:17 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
/me changes your rep :lol:.. Well, I know what I mean, but they were really stupid reputations, that was just an example, they were the stupidest things, we shouldn't be able to give a reputation to somebody with a low post count... or maybe at lea... | user27089 | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 04:14 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
| .Roy | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 04:13 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
Well, you can give someone a vote for having good taste in avatars. :lol: | WDZ | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 04:11 PM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
I'm glad that you've added some rules to this now, some people were getting the most stupid reputations... I saw this guy with 3 posts a +4 rep, and the reasons were all along the lines of "good avatar".... | user27089 | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 04:10 PM |
Reputation reason guidelines
These are the guidelines I follow when deciding whether a reputation vote should be deleted... [list][*] No comment at all (blank, or something like "no comment"). [*] Really short comment like "wtf" or just some emoticons. [*] Completely random ... | WDZ | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 04:07 PM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
very well put I like the rep system. It keeps me on track and it makes me want to help more and be good so i can get better reputation. Its like a challenge. It keeps me on the right tracks :P | .Roy | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 04:00 PM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
I agree with wj, all this "remove T&T" "remove reps" is rubbish really. Removing somthing isnt the answer, everyone growing up and stoping acting so childish about it is the answer. Yeh in some special cases it causes problems (I.E. Tasha and Joa... | Plik | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 03:58 PM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
Well. It's staying for now. If you think it's a bad system, ignore it. | wj | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 03:54 PM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
Senior members would be better..(Senior start at 250 posts...) | Jhrono | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 03:53 PM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
Better would be to just hide post and rep from all non full members. Stops them from whining about high post/rep count and also makes it so that they see the forums as they truly are for a little while before they get handed the post and rep counts. | Concord Dawn | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 03:44 PM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
I made a post on my blog which hinted at my displeasure at reputation being reduced to a mere number. If the rep system must stay, let's hide all the numbers, and instead have ratings like 'Helpful', 'Spammer', 'Average' - y'know, general rat... | RaceProUK | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 02:50 PM |
RE: [Split] Reputation System
Okay so its worked out for Carltos, But that prooves my point that everyones basing what they do and say around a stupid reputation. | Pyroteq | Forum & Website | 04-11-2005 at 01:48 PM |