| Search Results |
| Subject |
Author |
Forum |
Time |
RE: reputation on forums ^o)
and reputations are for people who have over 100 posts on the forum :) | Stigmata | Forum & Website | 01-11-2005 at 06:48 PM |
RE: reputation on forums ^o)
Is the person helpful? Nice? Funny? A spammer? A jerk? There are many possible reasons. :-/ | WDZ | Forum & Website | 01-11-2005 at 06:41 PM |
reputation on forums ^o)
N00b question but owel how long have there bin the reputations thing on the forums? only just noticed dat. what u ment to give/take points for? | M73A | Forum & Website | 01-11-2005 at 06:38 PM |
RE: two reputation things
Uhh... yeah. :p I'm not gonna add any best/worst reputation stats. Sure, it would be interesting (and only interesting - not useful), but there would be competition, and that would lead to more votes without good reasons. Also, people with negative... | WDZ | Forum & Website | 01-08-2005 at 10:07 AM |
RE: two reputation things
I didn't really think of this factor, I suppose that it would probably be taken as a competition and cause arguments etc. but surely, if people were mature, and we had this and the 'report reputation' feature, then it shouldn't get too bad, beca... | user27089 | Forum & Website | 01-08-2005 at 10:02 AM |
RE: two reputation things
No, because then it would be used as a system to rate others bad to get higher on the list, a competition to be up there near the top. | surfichris | Forum & Website | 01-08-2005 at 09:57 AM |
RE: two reputation things
THats a good idea, and maybe do it on stats on the forum index aswell, so that you can see who has the best reputation! (y) | user27089 | Forum & Website | 01-08-2005 at 09:43 AM |
RE: two reputation things
while we are still on topic i was thinkin that it would be a useful feature if we could sort members by their reputation status in the "member list" for more flexibility | s7a5 | Forum & Website | 01-08-2005 at 09:32 AM |
RE: two reputation things
I kind of had the same idea, since I dont like the way it is displayed now either, especially having it displayed the way it is under your post count on all the posts you make. Say you have 9 positive votes, and 4 negitive notes, Could it be displ... | Pr0xY | Forum & Website | 01-03-2005 at 10:18 PM |
RE: reputation
HAHA, sorry.:( | Purity | General Chit Chat | 01-02-2005 at 03:36 AM |
RE: reputation
Ratings are about how you behave onhere, nothing more nothing less. | Sunshine | General Chit Chat | 01-01-2005 at 11:21 PM |
RE: reputation
In life there is something called reputation, its wat people think of u, if someone says that you made out with a teacher (lets say) they wuld be giving u a bad rep. but in the forum its basicaly the same, peopel give u positives or negatives, people... | Purity | General Chit Chat | 01-01-2005 at 11:05 PM |
RE: reputation
You can rate a member if you have 100 posts or more (click on the name and it will take you to that persons profile, there you will see "vote" - or click on the reputationnumber, that will lead you directly to the ratingspage..there you'll see a ... | Sunshine | General Chit Chat | 01-01-2005 at 11:04 PM |
reputation
whats this repuataion thing and how does it work? | *Saint* | General Chit Chat | 01-01-2005 at 11:01 PM |
RE: two reputation things
I don't think that there is any use for the 90 day notification, its just useless, and a waste-of-space IMO. If you genuinely voted for them, then you should remember if it was negative or not, therefore, if you believe that they have changed enough... | user27089 | Forum & Website | 12-28-2004 at 01:47 PM |
RE: two reputation things
I think that we should be allowed to vote for the ppl having posts<100 but they should be given a chance to improve cause it may happen that a person mabbe a spammer at first and then change his wayz but some ppl may forget/not see/ignore(I hope not)... | John Anderton | Forum & Website | 12-28-2004 at 12:05 PM |
RE: two reputation things
I agree with that, you do need some way of reporting bad reps. | Plik | Forum & Website | 12-27-2004 at 09:17 PM |
RE: two reputation things
ok, i dont know what i was talking about then, but what i actually meant in my mind, was a feedback percentage, like in eBay | saralk | Forum & Website | 12-27-2004 at 08:47 PM |
RE: two reputation things
Maybe a short text that people had to read before voting, could correct things like this. The reputation system is not about favors. | leito | Forum & Website | 12-27-2004 at 05:53 AM |
RE: two reputation things
In other words, a place dedicated to arguments. I dunno about that... :dodgy: | WDZ | Forum & Website | 12-27-2004 at 05:11 AM |
RE: two reputation things
I think that we should be able to vote them as spammers to be honest :p... why should we not be able to vote users under 100 posts for constantly spamming, but we can give negative reputation to spammers that are above 100 posts, its just ludacris IM... | user27089 | Forum & Website | 12-27-2004 at 01:11 AM |
RE: two reputation things
Yes, there's no doubt about that. And I don't think I said that everything here was spam :s But it doesn't mean that all spammers or people who do something bad (as in insult others or give them an unjustified rep.) are seen right away. I should ... | L. Coyote | Forum & Website | 12-26-2004 at 11:23 PM |
RE: two reputation things
Lol trust me, admins here are very strict in terms of spam comparing to other forums im in....u can be sure that 99% of the posts of a user are not spam(here)... and i think its well done because in this forum there is a T&T u can make a new topic s... | paperless | Forum & Website | 12-26-2004 at 11:16 PM |
RE: two reputation things
:) Anyone above 100 posts can vote, this can be a spammer or not. | L. Coyote | Forum & Website | 12-26-2004 at 11:11 PM |
RE: two reputation things
I'm pretty sure that the ones eligible to vote for others are not spammers, or act according to the forum rules. | Titty | Forum & Website | 12-26-2004 at 11:09 PM |