| Search Results |
| Subject |
Author |
Forum |
Time |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
Or, as my brother says, 'put up and shut up'. Let's face it, the reputation system *cannot* be avoided. That situation won't change when we're told not to complain about it :S | Sam Spade | Forum & Website | 12-14-2004 at 02:37 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
Just don't do any voting, and ignore the number shown by your posts. Oh, and most importantly, don't complain about it. :tongue: | WDZ | Forum & Website | 12-14-2004 at 01:53 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
How can we avoid it when there is no way to turn it off, we can't hide it (like avatars and signatures), we can't opt out and there is no way to refuse or block votes. | Sam Spade | Forum & Website | 12-14-2004 at 01:39 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
if you dont like the reputation system, just avoid it. | Chrono | Forum & Website | 12-13-2004 at 08:32 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
I think there would be far less trouble if all reputation votes were anonymous... | sock | Forum & Website | 12-13-2004 at 03:43 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
Adware is, by definition, untargeted. It collects no information. If ads are targeted, that means that there is a piece of spyware behind them, making the package spyware. AFAIK, the ads in the sponsor package are untargeted, therefore by definition,... | RaceProUK | Forum & Website | 12-13-2004 at 12:53 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
Didn't she have another name before that Surfi! I think you made a lot of sense with your ideas about this reputation system. My reps only small but to me it means something because I know people whoi gave them meant what they said :d | Wabz | Forum & Website | 12-13-2004 at 12:30 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
1 year. | surfichris | Forum & Website | 12-13-2004 at 11:06 AM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
The entire idea is fundamentally flawed - that suggestion will not improve matters. | Sam Spade | Forum & Website | 12-13-2004 at 10:36 AM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
ive got a +3 reputation, and ive been here 3years... and they have all been in the past few weeks.... doesnt bother me tho :) i know i help here, and if you look, you can see for yourself that i try my best ^_^ i dont need everyine else to know what... | kangie | Forum & Website | 12-12-2004 at 05:09 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
You are supposed to rate someone for what that person does for the community..not because you're friends, as a joke or because someone asked you to vote for him/her (no matter wether its a positive or negative vote). Really what does a vote mean if ... | Sunshine | Forum & Website | 12-12-2004 at 04:13 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
Maybe we should go back to the idea of only selected members can vote... | Anubis | Forum & Website | 12-12-2004 at 03:58 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
I really don't like this repuation shit. The boards aren't really a popularity contest like some people are making them out to be now they have reputations. As far as I'm concerned its a waste of time and an extra field in the database. Undoub... | Wabz | Forum & Website | 12-12-2004 at 03:57 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
Reputation voting is inherently flawed. | Sam Spade | Forum & Website | 12-12-2004 at 02:33 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
the guy abused the forums in the first place, but what does his account matter anyway ;) ? | Millenium_edition | Forum & Website | 12-12-2004 at 01:40 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
Although "herd" (I like that term :p) voting does occur, I hardly think it is happening that often without everyone having a good reason...and if it does an admin can always sort it :P however the only reason I gave you a negative rep was because I... | Anubis | Forum & Website | 12-12-2004 at 12:37 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
That has a good reason, and they are just haveing a joke | Plik | Forum & Website | 12-12-2004 at 12:29 PM |
RE: [split] reputation system abuse
Yes, I know this is an example of going after a spammer, but its still proves my point. Herd voting can and does occur, even amongst 100+ posters. | Sam Spade | Forum & Website | 12-12-2004 at 12:26 PM |
RE: Reputation System suggestion
If where the number is is too small, why not use the word "reputation" infronta it instead? | Sunshine | Forum & Website | 12-04-2004 at 01:32 PM |
RE: Reputation System suggestion
Let's not get nip tucky here... | Moo | Forum & Website | 12-04-2004 at 05:04 AM |
RE: Reputation System suggestion
maybe if you've already voted for a person, change the "rate user" button to a "change rating" button | gnownoskcid | Forum & Website | 12-04-2004 at 05:01 AM |
RE: Reputation System suggestion
Yeah... I thought the editing method was just common sense. :-/ | WDZ | Forum & Website | 12-04-2004 at 04:54 AM |
RE: Reputation System suggestion
You can already edit the the vote, just click the rate button again ;) | Sunshine | Forum & Website | 12-03-2004 at 12:25 PM |
RE: Reputation System suggestion
how about an edit button so you can change the message or if you change your mind.. | azn angel | Forum & Website | 12-03-2004 at 12:22 PM |
RE: Reputation System suggestion
Good suggestion, it's been on my mind too... (Y) | sock | Forum & Website | 12-03-2004 at 09:54 AM |