login | register | shoutbox

 What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » Search » Results

Search Results
Subject Author Forum Time
RE: Reputation
Thats why if you knew who it was you wouldn't have 2. The Thread was i said they should re-install Plus! l8r on i gave the links and they said it had nothing to do with it.		GiantSpiderForum & Website05-02-2004 at 01:03 PM
RE: Reputation
or made public (like suggested in that other thread about the system) :p		CookieRevisedForum & Website05-02-2004 at 01:02 PM
RE: Reputation
If every user here who got voted a bad reputation posted a thread asking for who/what/why this whole thing is a waste of time... I really think it needs some improvments.		Johnny_MacForum & Website05-02-2004 at 12:37 PM
RE: Reputation
I dont want to see that, im sure then this system will be abused.		VarishForum & Website05-02-2004 at 12:25 PM
RE: Reputation
Is that an excuse? :-o :-p The system has been made so only forum staff and elites can vote because it would be abused by alot of the normal users here. Like i said before though, its the users opinion of the post, if it was worthwhile or if it was ...		surfichrisForum & Website05-02-2004 at 12:23 PM
RE: Reputation
Yeah but wasn't the system ment for every1 to vote. Since it's only the ppl that matter can vote you should be able to explain yourself.		GiantSpiderForum & Website05-02-2004 at 12:21 PM
RE: Reputation
The system was not designed to show who gave who a reputation, and not designed to be able to challenge someone's decision. Reputations are meant to be based off the users [b]own[/b] opinion of the post.		surfichrisForum & Website05-02-2004 at 12:15 PM
RE: Reputation
Yeah i no but im not talking about them. I'm talking about being able to challenge their decision. Hoe u gonna do that if u dnt no who disagree's? 		GiantSpiderForum & Website05-02-2004 at 12:14 PM
RE: Reputation
You cannot see who gave you a reputation point. You can only see the post they gave you a reputation for, when it was given and an optional comment.		TochjoForum & Website05-02-2004 at 12:13 PM
RE: Reputation
I don't think you can see it (except if the elite/mod/admin add's his/her name to the comment). If you mean that the one who gave you your bad rep.point has the right to plead his/her case then they can give the reason in the "Comment" box :).		KryptonateForum & Website05-02-2004 at 12:10 PM
Reputation
Is there a way to find out who gave you +1/-1 on ur rep. If not i think there should be as Someone has given me a bad rep and I think the person should have the right to plead their case.		GiantSpiderForum & Website05-02-2004 at 12:07 PM
RE: GMT time and Buddy list and reputation
GMT time: I don't know when you saw that GMT time was 10:01 PM, but I think you should just try the settings. Looking at the time you posted that, I'd say GMT-4 should work. Just try it :) The buddy list is a quick way of seeing who's online, and ...		TochjoForum & Website04-30-2004 at 03:53 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Now after much reviewing and critising I discovered my own two favourite options A) Guidos system B) Wabz's system Wabz's system is perhaps the most simple to implement and proberly the least likely to cause a problem You guys ready for it . [si...		WabzForum & Website04-30-2004 at 03:44 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
WDZ, may I add some comments on your 1st posts then: Forgetting 1 big thing: if the users were too lazy to change their vote on a per-user system, then they will be certainly too lazy to change (or add in this case) many post-votes! Hence this is not...		CookieRevisedForum & Website04-30-2004 at 03:04 PM
GMT time and Buddy list and reputation
User control panel Edit Options Time Offset: Please select your timezone from the list. GMT time now is 10:01 PM. [color=orange]for the life of me i can't figure this one out how do i set this for eastern time it is 10:47 am [/color] :$ how do a...		Hapi2knowuForum & Website04-30-2004 at 02:49 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
I'm tempted to just go with the Guido system right now, mainly because it's the simplest, but I'm afraid I'll be :blah:ed at. :p I guess the lists in the first post are pretty much complete, so we're ready for a poll... :^)		WDZForum & Website04-29-2004 at 05:52 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Why don't we implement both systems. :refuck: We can keep discussing two more weeks, and that's not the point... /me whips DZ on the shoulders :grin:		KeyStormForum & Website04-29-2004 at 05:47 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
The comments are supplementary, remember you still have a reputation rating: if WDZ has [color=green]25[/color] it means he's a good guy. I don't see where rates are irrelevant. Per post ratings are much more irrelevant, since you can't change, yo...		GuidoForum & Website04-29-2004 at 05:39 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
With the User-Rating you have to literally CHANGE the rating each time the behaviour changes (Think of 50 1337 members becoming respectable members, will you re-rate everyone?) Another thing I want to say, a disadvantage of current user-rating syste...		KeyStormForum & Website04-29-2004 at 05:25 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
I think it's not logical to vote on the past (well, actually, yes, but not on the past that has changed). When you rate per user, you take into account everything you remember about that user, if he WAS helpful in the past, or maybe if he WAS a son ...		GuidoForum & Website04-29-2004 at 05:17 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
I'm lazy, but I would much rather change one user-vote than submit 20 post-votes. :refuck: I don't see how changing the reputation is any less "manual" with the post system. :-/		WDZForum & Website04-29-2004 at 03:54 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Blah, but you have to modify the vote manually and I already said we're all so lazy in here (all but WDZ, of course :P). I still think that although subtile, post-rating makes a progression with the behaviour. If you wan't it faster: Do the expire-...		KeyStormForum & Website04-29-2004 at 02:50 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
You could just change it to neutral... :p Speaking of neutral: I was thinking, comments should be required when you do a neutral vote, because what's the point otherwise? :P It's a completely useless vote.		WDZForum & Website04-29-2004 at 02:04 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
possible, but not nessecairy I think...		CookieRevisedForum & Website04-29-2004 at 12:53 PM
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
if you can change a vote you should be able to remove it too, shouldn't you?		CholiForum & Website04-29-2004 at 11:22 AM
[Hide Excerpts] Pages: (38): « First « 27 28 29 30 [ 31 ] 32 33 34 35 » Last »