| Search Results |
| Subject |
Author |
Forum |
Time |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
:O What would be shown in profiles? the comment or the comment and the person who give the reputation? now i'm a bit confused... i dunno what i think about what would be the best system :rolleyes: | Choli | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 05:15 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Yeah, that's why I'm not sure of per-post rating... I like the public idea, WDZ | Guido | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 04:58 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Of course not... we don't need post counts, avatars, or signatures, but we have those... :p I thought people would like having a reputation system, and we might benefit from it... I'm not so sure anymore... | WDZ | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 04:54 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
there's a small issue in this rating system.. lets say some dodgy member post a dodgy post. Ill read the post and say "oh, dodgy post, dodgy guy, ill rate this post :P". Then Choli comes, read the post and rates "negative" Then WDZ, Tochjo, Mipp... | Chrono | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 04:50 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Agreed. | Guido | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 04:25 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Talk about abuse of rating...nice example...this is kinda what i been trying to warn about all along. | Sunshine | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 10:22 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Well, maybe there shouldn't be the RED card as it is, maybe there should only be gray and green. Edit: Someone rated [url=http://shoutbox.menthix.net/showthread.php?ti d=24273&pid=232945#pid232945]this post[/url] negatively. Reason: double posting. B... | KeyStorm | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 10:16 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
nah... or the reputation system is complete (with green and red cards) or we don't have any reputation system at all... i don't get the idea of a user being able to be given a good reputation but not a bad one. | Choli | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 10:13 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Ok, still the question remains do we really need a ratingsystem? Meaning its still a i like u i dont like u thing..and it can cause wars amongst users of this forum an the ppl giving the ratings..an think of what a red card can make ppl think bout th... | Sunshine | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 09:54 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
oh well :P about that: i don't agree. I think only current people allowed to give reputations (admins mods & elites) should give them. noone more. | Choli | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 09:48 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Yes, i do agree on that....posting more mite even put that person in the picture for rating (who really notices a person who doesnt post that much?). It was a comment on the idea of giving ppl voting/ratingrights when past a certain amount of posts ... | Sunshine | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 09:31 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
About the reputatiosn system being anonymous: It should be anonymous (as it's now) and there's no need in adding an option to make public (to the person who is receiving the reputation) who is giving it. If I give a reputation to someone and what h... | Choli | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 09:20 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Still, what are we putting ratings on, a person or the value of that persons advice? Why would anyone deliberately give bad advice anyway? An how you gonna prevent ppl from makin judgements based on character? | Sunshine | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 09:01 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
In MY system (H) 1 negative point counts the same as 10 negative points to one user. So it's anti-abusive :rolleyes:. Guido, btw, nifty was meant kind ;) it's obviously HTML, but a nice HTML, thou. :) And I read some of your posts in there. | KeyStorm | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 08:57 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Hey guys i'd like to share a few points of view here (don't startle they are very direct!) 1. The number of posts doesnt say anything bout how long a user has been member on this forum nor does it say anything about the content of the posts..so rat... | Sunshine | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 08:07 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
The reputation system is supposed to move us away from judging users by post count... seems kinda ironic... I dunno :p | WDZ | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 04:05 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
If I allow regular users to "repute," I'll come up with some good rules for deciding who's allowed. I don't know if they'll be allowed to vote, but that's a different topic that can be discussed later in a different thread. | WDZ | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 03:55 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
/me is so lost. Anywayz, I still dont like the current system and say it should either be Guidos way or the way of 200, 400, 600, 800, etc. posts to vote. | Dane | Forum & Website | 04-27-2004 at 12:01 AM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
I don't like having a graphical representation, cause that doesn't actually show anything about the reputation. Right now, patchou has the same reputation as I have, and it's obvious his is much higher. With numbers, this doesn't happen. Plus, wh... | Guido | Forum & Website | 04-26-2004 at 11:43 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Menthix's Post:Agreed. Like the negative reputation WDZ gave me. Now to go through and read the rest of the thread again. | surfichris | Forum & Website | 04-26-2004 at 11:43 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
([s]Sitting[/s] Standing at work) Thinking about this today... 1) I'm not too sure on forum staff members actually having a reputation. From a newbie point of view you come along and see a mod has a poor reputation; what is that going to make you th... | Johnny_Mac | Forum & Website | 04-26-2004 at 11:18 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
I'd like to change a bit of my opinion one what i said earlier after the first experiences i've had now (Bob, Segosa, Dane in this thread)... Good one, better then numbers i think. Out of quotes. I'd say skip the original two systems and go with e... | Menthix | Forum & Website | 04-26-2004 at 11:11 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Err... did you actually read the hundreds of posts where me and all the others actually [i]talked[/i] about that "nifty UI" (which is just some HTML controls btw) and the other alternatives? If not, well, do it :P The post with the sshots is one of... | Guido | Forum & Website | 04-26-2004 at 11:09 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
Well i meant that the more time a user is registered he is earning a bigger reputation (good or bad)... A just registered user doesn't have any reputation... (edit:) even if you give him a lot of points of good (or bad) reputation. Reputation is so... | Choli | Forum & Website | 04-26-2004 at 10:39 PM |
RE: Reputation: users or posts?
[i]Contundente[/i] :grin:? I don't see why? The more posts by the 400's I vote the better my rating is becoming. I always can change my previous votes If I felt I was wrong or I voted out of rage, but my "2 points range"-rating will be exact the ... | KeyStorm | Forum & Website | 04-26-2004 at 10:33 PM |