| Search Results |
| Subject |
Author |
Forum |
Time |
RE: Get rid of the reputation system
annual* all that needs to be done is forbid rep threads, if someone has something to say, pm the person. | Supersonicdarky | Forum & Website | 02-24-2007 at 12:52 AM |
RE: Get rid of the reputation system
It sure was.. and admins said they liked it and its staying. | Rolando | Forum & Website | 02-24-2007 at 12:51 AM |
RE: Get rid of the reputation system
it's like a yearly tradition | user44571 | Forum & Website | 02-24-2007 at 12:51 AM |
RE: Get rid of the reputation system
Wasn't this discussed in the past..? | albert | Forum & Website | 02-24-2007 at 12:50 AM |
RE: Get rid of the reputation system
I wouldn't moan too much: you've all got good reps after all. | RaceProUK | Forum & Website | 02-24-2007 at 12:49 AM |
Reputation System
http://shoutbox.menthix.net/showthread.php?tid=720 60 I'm tempted to agree with him. I'm sick and tired of all the bitching. | wj | | 02-24-2007 at 12:44 AM |
RE: Get rid of the reputation system
i totally agree that its not needed and that it is pointless all its really doing is putting people against each other. and what is the point of it anyway .... to acknowledge that some one is helpful or not. let other people judge that not members te... | Wally | Forum & Website | 02-24-2007 at 12:40 AM |
RE: Get rid of the reputation system
No, it's still pointless with it being private. Report his post or him doing something wrong or PM an admin/moderator about it. | brian | Forum & Website | 02-24-2007 at 12:36 AM |
RE: Get rid of the reputation system
[10:13:07am] <linx05> or make the rep system private so only mods can see it As I've said before the rep system is a bad idea. It may be handy for the moderating team but not for everyone else. Butttt... nothing will change. The forum here is so set... | linx05 | Forum & Website | 02-24-2007 at 12:20 AM |
Get rid of the reputation system
To be honest, I'm sick of all these threads over the forums complaining about how X was treated and Y was treated. The reputation system is pointless to be honest. I do agree that CookieRevised, Sunshine & others do deserve to have a good reputatio... | brian | Forum & Website | 02-24-2007 at 12:17 AM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
or you could simply report it, and stop trying to get wdz to modify the reputation system at any given time for invalid reasons. | Lou | Forum & Website | 02-13-2007 at 11:30 AM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
OR you could just behave so people don't have a reason to return-rep you. ;) If they still do it then, I guess it will be deleted since I don't think "He/she neg-repped me" is considered a valid reason for a -1. | Jesus | Forum & Website | 02-13-2007 at 11:15 AM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
Its a sticky.. Edit: little suggestion, People who have.. say a -5 reputation, cant give other people a rep back? I think it could calm the rep-back-ness down abit... :P Just a suggestion.. | Kenji | Forum & Website | 02-13-2007 at 03:30 AM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
you bumped a thread by 6 months, just to tell WDZ to use a translator, for a forum that is supposed to be english? | NiteMare | Forum & Website | 02-13-2007 at 03:22 AM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
I guess :( | Rolando | Forum & Website | 02-13-2007 at 02:58 AM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
| WDZ | Forum & Website | 02-13-2007 at 02:55 AM |
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
Use google translator then :dodgy: | Rolando | Forum & Website | 02-13-2007 at 02:52 AM |
RE: Reputation idea
I was in this situation a couple of weeks ago, someone had given me a neg after I'd had given the one for what I personally feel wasn't a valid reason. I PM'd DZ explaining and it was removed. I'm not going to say I don't care about my rep; I do... | Spunky | Forum & Website | 11-26-2006 at 10:12 PM |
RE: Reputation idea
IMO you should use the report button. That's why it is there. Only if you have some big explanation to do you could maybe PM someone. PM's are personal and you'll never know if that admin will be in time to read it, or read it at all... Either way... | CookieRevised | Forum & Website | 11-26-2006 at 01:21 PM |
RE: Reputation idea
I do not agree with the idea to have to wait 2 weeks, I don't think is the best solution... Anyway... as I'm seeing, the possible solution is only that given by John Anderton (quoted down)... Just PM the person or an Adm... Agree with you again in... | MicroWay | Forum & Website | 11-26-2006 at 01:17 PM |
RE: Reputation idea
woo \o/ :P | John Anderton | Forum & Website | 11-26-2006 at 09:56 AM |
RE: Reputation idea
DZ's too lazy :P | ins4ne | Forum & Website | 11-26-2006 at 09:49 AM |
RE: Reputation idea
yes exactly because if you truly do think i deserve a neg, then the 2 weeks will not matter, and will not change your desision | NiteMare | Forum & Website | 11-26-2006 at 08:42 AM |
RE: Reputation idea
I agree, it's a dodgy idea... :dodgy: | WDZ | Forum & Website | 11-26-2006 at 08:42 AM |
RE: Reputation idea
Ok so if both of us think the other spams and if you rep me first, i should wait 2 weeks for neg repping you for a reason which may be legit and not a "rep back"? Thats not right imo :( | John Anderton | Forum & Website | 11-26-2006 at 08:34 AM |