Suggestion (simple one): The use of tags in custom names. - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: WLM Plus! General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +----- Thread: Suggestion (simple one): The use of tags in custom names. (/showthread.php?tid=14670) Suggestion (simple one): The use of tags in custom names. by CookieRevised on 08-19-2003 at 05:48 PM
I would like to use tags (like (!N), (!M), ...) in custom contactnames, so I can make a custom name but without losing the 'real name' which people use: RE: Suggestion (simple one): The use of tags in custom names. by Choli on 08-19-2003 at 06:12 PM
That will cause recursive calls and Plus will fall into an endless loop. RE: Suggestion (simple one): The use of tags in custom names. by Wabz on 08-19-2003 at 06:21 PM
Loops Argh RE: RE: Suggestion (simple one): The use of tags in custom names. by CookieRevised on 08-19-2003 at 06:31 PM
quote:Hmm, yes, didn't think of that, but this could be easly avoided though. (looping only once or twice)... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- EDIT: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now that I think of it... It would not loop, wouldn't it? Because (!N) is the name used by the contactperson: 'His nick' is not (!N), it is the name I give (costum name)..... (!CN) is another thing:.... If you enter in the custom name: "His nick: (!CN)" that would give: "His nick: His nick: His nick: (!CN)"etc... (loops, which could be fixed to 1 or 2 loops, see mIRC scripting for that) or it could give: "His nick: " ...depending on wheter (!CN) is resolved before or after. Then again, another solution is to prevent only the use of (!CN) in costum names and everything would be A OK.... Just only the use of (!N) and (!M) in custom names would be great.... RE: Suggestion (simple one): The use of tags in custom names. by Choli on 08-19-2003 at 10:02 PM
I mistook (!CN) for (!N), sorry. |