I'm alive! - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Announcements (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +---- Forum: Announcements & News (/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +----- Forum: Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=27) +------ Thread: I'm alive! (/showthread.php?tid=1495) I'm alive! by Patchou on 09-22-2002 at 03:31 AM
Hello people! [no subject] by Chrono on 09-22-2002 at 03:54 AM
Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou !Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! Patchou ! OMG !!!! [no subject] by shine on 09-22-2002 at 04:50 AM
My goodness....atlast.... [no subject] by WDZ on 09-22-2002 at 05:10 AM
[no subject] by Chrono on 09-22-2002 at 05:18 AM
quote: Yeah, had happened the same to me [no subject] by WDZ on 09-22-2002 at 05:29 AM
Hey, Patchou, have you seen the suggestion list? You can add that stuff to Plus, if you want... [no subject] by Muss on 09-22-2002 at 09:01 AM
Don't get to pushy DZ, he has only just came back. [no subject] by reisyboy on 09-22-2002 at 10:30 AM yippie i can b happy again [no subject] by freakenstine on 09-22-2002 at 04:05 PM glad you see you're alive Patchou Wow by Patchou on 09-23-2002 at 02:57 AM Wow, I'm not worthy of so much praise! Thanks a lot ... most of all, big thanks to Muss, WDZ, Chrono and Jae for still being here and still supporting Messenger Plus!.... be sure that all your past suggestions have not been lost... I'll go take a good look in the suggestion forum as soon as I start the real work.... hopefully... this week.... yahoo! [no subject] by shine on 09-23-2002 at 04:37 AM Yahoo....? I thought MSN.. Just kidding patchou [no subject] by Muss on 09-23-2002 at 11:18 AM
quote: *ChroMo post* I don't care! by oxtie on 09-23-2002 at 12:28 PM
Hez still making fun of us! Guys I say he won't do a thing! kinda sucks you see, I visited this site for more then 100 times by now.... Nothing new and there won't ever be! Patchou is just patching us again! [no subject] by Patchou on 09-23-2002 at 02:22 PM
Haaa oxtie.... well, I'm sorry if I had to live for the past monthes ... yes, I'm going to start developing Plus! again, and you want to know why? the main reason is that I have a lot of personal problems for a couple of monthes now and I'm searching for something to do to change my mind... programming is a very good thing.. I reinstalled Windows XP this WE, along with Visual Studio and I tried Messenger 5. This week I'm gonna go in File\New\Project and enter "Messenger Plus! 2.0"... it will be a whole new program made from scratch. [no subject] by gisteren on 09-23-2002 at 02:40 PM
-hi ! [no subject] by freakenstine on 09-23-2002 at 03:42 PM oxtie Patchou doesn't have to explain anything to you or anyone else. He has the right to have a life too. He doesn't get paid to make this program he does it because he wants to. Hail the mighty Patchou!!!! ;) by Menthix on 09-23-2002 at 06:45 PM
Wow... [no subject] by Menthix on 09-23-2002 at 07:14 PM
Ok... read the topic fully now... [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 09-23-2002 at 08:33 PM
quote: Not forgetting your new mod, obviously. TO EVERYONE THAT DOUBTED: Johnny_Mac told you never to give up hope. [no subject] by WDZ on 09-23-2002 at 08:49 PM
quote:Cool... glad you're definitely going to do it... quote:That sounds like lots of work... I'm just curious, why did you decide to do that? Like Jae said, keep all the same great features. I'm sure v2 will be awesome! quote:haha... [no subject] by reisyboy on 09-23-2002 at 09:20 PM
quote: ok JMac i was a bit paranoid [no subject] by shine on 09-24-2002 at 05:58 AM
dont pester Patchou to something... Its his wish, his time, his effort... leave him alone and wish him the best.... Only thing at the moment we can give is that..... and may be our suggestions too.... its his choice to incorporate it. Got it Oxtie. [no subject] by Chrono on 09-25-2002 at 04:15 PM
quote: HAHA U are welcomed I still want a spanish version Patchou !!! I could translate it... as I did with my copy of Plus! 1.42b (Reshack ) :grin : quote: Huh ? [no subject] by Patchou on 09-25-2002 at 07:57 PM Well Chrono, if you want it, how could I ignore your wish? ... in fact, yes, I plan to add multi-language support in MP 2.0, but I think it won't be public.. what I mean is that you'll have to contact me, I'll send you some files to translate and then I'll integrate it in the software myself. In any case, I promise, it will be there in the new version. [no subject] by Chrono on 09-27-2002 at 04:00 AM
quote: hehe thanx I would be happy to trnslate it * Chrono would enjoy a spanish messenger Plus! version [no subject] by Menthix on 09-27-2002 at 09:51 AM
* Menthix want's todo a translation to dutch... but patchou, i forgot yur adress [no subject] by Patchou on 09-27-2002 at 01:28 PM Happy to see that you're still here Jae. The document you sent me some monthes ago is very helpful to me. I already started to code the new version and I already added the multi-lungual support. Basically, all you'll have to do is request the file to translate, it's like a big txt file... when it's done, you send it back to me and it's part of the software! of course, we won't do that before the final version is ready to be released, you don't want to translate the same stuff again and again right? ... also, when you versions will be released, I'll send you only the differences between the two versions so that you don't have to translate it again. This one if no fake by Patchou on 09-28-2002 at 04:30 AM
Just a proof that I'm working.... It's now working in Messenger 5 . [no subject] by shine on 09-28-2002 at 05:57 AM Coool .... Getting exited [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 09-28-2002 at 11:06 AM
Cool. [no subject] by Patchou on 09-28-2002 at 07:43 PM
Thanks for the link, however, don't worry, removing the banner is trivial, I just didn't added the code back in MP2. Note: if someone as the time to create a poll for this forum, I would really appreciate it... it would be to ask people what feature they like most and what feature they would prefer to see improved. [no subject] by WDZ on 09-28-2002 at 08:28 PM
quote:I can make some kind of poll tonight. Here's what I'm thinking of doing... let me know if this is OK... A page with 2 sections will be displayed. On the first section, the user can select one favorite option from a list of all the current Plus! features. In the second section, the same list will be shown, but the user will be asked to select a feature that should be improved. A "comments" box will allow the user to give a more specific response. Maybe each user should be allowed to vote for more than one option? That would be harder to make... [no subject] by reisyboy on 09-28-2002 at 09:58 PM WDZ make a poll in a section anyone can vote in and dont have to sign up to be members more results then wider range [no subject] by WDZ on 09-28-2002 at 10:02 PM
Yeah, I know... the results will be better if guests can vote. I'll have to make sure that they can't vote multiple times too. [no subject] by Patchou on 09-29-2002 at 04:30 AM Thanks a lot! for the features that people would like to see, put anything you have seen regulary in the past monthes on the Suggestion section, along with what you have in mind yourself. I promize that: any feature requested by a lot of people will be in MP2... of course... it has to be doable [no subject] by WDZ on 09-29-2002 at 05:10 AM
Oh, I thought you wanted the current features of Plus as poll options. Let me get this straight... you want a list of suggested features and a list of existing features that need to be improved? French translation by Misterjad on 09-29-2002 at 08:04 AM maybe i can make a complete french translation of messenger plus! [no subject] by Menthix on 09-29-2002 at 11:53 AM
Misterjad, that is great. I added you to a list i'm creating. It contains the names and emailadresses of people, and the language the can translate Plus! into. [no subject] by Patchou on 09-29-2002 at 05:29 PM
Thanks for your efforts, the poll is great. I'll check the results in about a weeks. Could you add a counter on the page that shows the total number of user that voted? [no subject] by Misterjad on 09-29-2002 at 06:35 PM
hum [no subject] by Menthix on 09-29-2002 at 07:31 PM
Hmmm..... you mean like some kind of dump every day... so people can see Patchou's progress? [no subject] by ginge on 09-29-2002 at 07:57 PM
Releasing beta copies to a timetable almost guarantees they will be broken and also hampers progress because he would have to fix things on Sunday, whereas when developing its often a lot better break things in the short term to get them working better in the long term. [no subject] by reisyboy on 09-29-2002 at 08:23 PM ME would like that to [no subject] by WDZ on 09-29-2002 at 08:37 PM Patchou said he wants to "keep some surprises" so he probably won't make those weekly releases... we could keep track of all the progress he makes... [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 09-29-2002 at 08:53 PM
quote:Patchou = French... so wont he do the "complete" translation? [no subject] by Misterjad on 09-29-2002 at 08:56 PM yeah i know that, but in the last release just the head menu and the ad were traduce and the other things were in english so as patchou is developing plus! in english, i'll traduce it in frenc [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 09-29-2002 at 09:00 PM
Plus! was only avaliable in english, the new multi language thing will be new to MP2.00. [no subject] by Menthix on 09-29-2002 at 09:14 PM No, the partial French translation already existed... Patchou did that, but you wont noticed if you're not french. [no subject] by Patchou on 09-30-2002 at 12:02 AM
Well, yes, in Messenger Plus! currently, if you have Messenger french installed your menus are in french, but that's all. As I said, the new version will (in fact, it already does ) support multi language. Concerning the french translation.... I'm a little lazy so I suppose I will ask someone to do it for me ... when you program, you are used to do it in english, event the comments in the code are in english. Important... by Patchou on 09-30-2002 at 12:08 AM
In fact, I'm really wondering this: is it better to concentrate on scripts even if it's not very friendly to use at the end or should I forget about the scripting feature and make a new version of Messenger Plus! with most of the stuff I see in the Suggestion page of this forum.... I definitively need your input on this, that's a damn important question. Again, my main problem is the limitations of scripting languages when we want to create windows, modify windows, create bitmaps, etc etc... [no subject] by WDZ on 09-30-2002 at 12:21 AM Well, what if you do all the advanced features yourself, in C++, then have scripting as just an extra feature that people can use to make simple stuff? [no subject] by Chrono on 09-30-2002 at 01:00 AM
quote: I translated Ginges msg++ He send me a text file , the same idea... And Jae ... Chrono17@hotmail... Spanish [no subject] by Muss on 09-30-2002 at 02:15 AM
Well, might be more work for you but is a suggestion, you could release two versions. [no subject] by ··¤(`×[¤kår(v)å¤]×´)¤·· on 09-30-2002 at 04:05 AM hmmmmmm ... i guess i should also follow the pack and say welcome back *waves* ... [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 09-30-2002 at 07:45 AM
The 2 releases idea sounds alright... I dont know how confusing that might get for some people... [no subject] by shine on 09-30-2002 at 09:43 AM Could be and Optional Installation [no subject] by ginge on 09-30-2002 at 10:34 AM
Scripting should NOT be optional in anyway - it defeats the whole point of doing scripting and moving many functions of Plus! into script. Either have script or don't, but just as a program wide decision. [no subject] by Patchou on 09-30-2002 at 01:56 PM
Well ginge, personally I really love COM, I'm just thinking about all the others . There's a big difference between telling people that they can do scritps and telling people that for most stuff they'll have to create COM objects. Also, I disagree with the idea of two different versions, it would make scripts useless for most people. [no subject] by ··¤(`×[¤kår(v)å¤]×´)¤·· on 09-30-2002 at 02:42 PM Well speakin from a non computer techie brain as myself i figure you will all make the best decisions you can for the forum ... i have no suggestions really so i shall just leave it at that but im sure like i said above you will all come to some reasonable setup ... i will just sit back and watch it happen ... good luck deciding on a solution to make this forum the best it can be :thedevil: ... i really shouldn't b up so damn late ... i am actually starting to make sense lol ... well i am to me making sense lol [no subject] by shine on 09-30-2002 at 02:56 PM
As far as I understood, ginge is proposing something like the header files in C++, so that users could use it to have custom GUI's etsc.....(So far I have not gone throughly into the COM-scripting and cannot comment on that.) And ginge's Idea (if my undestanding is right) is acceptable. Otherwise as he said most of the users will get fed up ultimately. [no subject] by ginge on 09-30-2002 at 03:30 PM
If scripting is just a way of opening the power of Plus! up to the more advanced users then why not just make it open source? (possibly to a small group of people - there aren't that many who can actually do C++) This would also give you people submitting patches and enhancements with code (alright, that's not really true, but it is possible ) [no subject] by Menthix on 09-30-2002 at 08:18 PM
As i don't understand things like COM etc. i can't go into a real technical discussion, i'm not a coder. But let's see what i can add tho this... quote:Personaly i think that scripting will be good enough when i just comes down to sending messages, sending messages on specific recieved messages, ability to automize status changing... to kind of this... so no additional GUI to it. Patchou, what your basically saying is that you can use API's with VB/Jscript, which do need. But what if you do like WDZ said? quote:Is that a possibility? So you create all the features we already had, add some new ones & a really basic scripting engine in J/VBscript. What will users be capable of whitout those API's, and what won't the be capable of?? Can you give some more examples of that, it might help. About Gringe's COM solution, i don't understand too much about that, but if it is solves the problem, and it's do-able you could give that a try. Ofcourse that would depend on how much time it's going to take, and if it's worth that time. Also i think that memory and CPU load are very important things, because Plus! runs almost always on many people's PC it is important that it won't take away heaps of memory, just because it wan't to execute some script. Plus! should be able to run in the background at anytime, whitout memory errors. I think basicly it comes down to, either: - Find a decent solution for the API's problem (COM?) and continue the way you were originally planning. - Make the old + some new features yourself in plain C++, and just add a much less advanced scripting engine, which will be capable of only the basic things. - No scripting at all, just go for great features which you code yourself. Your the one which can choose that thhe best. quote:Ok, yur added to the list you'll recieve mail tomorrow or the day after (busy now). [no subject] by Patchou on 09-30-2002 at 08:58 PM
I suppose I'm begnning to have a better idea of what I'm going to, thanks to your posts. As Jae and Ginge said, if the script was to give real advanecd features, then why use Plus!... just do your own addon! [no subject] by Menthix on 10-01-2002 at 12:05 AM
I think yur right, having a simple scripting engine is probaly the best. [no subject] by alvarezp on 10-01-2002 at 06:20 AM
Patchou, I just BEG you: Do NOT turn Messenger Plus into bloatware. Please. I hate programs like Winamp 3 and Windows XP because of that. I'd like to have a fast program. [no subject] by Patchou on 10-01-2002 at 01:52 PM
Speed issues concern me a lot too... heover I have a Pentium III so I'll wait for the result of the beta tests to know if MP slows down your computer.... normally, with scripting disabled, the new version of Messenger Plus! should even be a little faster. Enabling scripting won't slow down the system by itself, however, your scripts might so be careful [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 10-01-2002 at 01:58 PM
Patchou... on your progress page you say can’t complete (or whatever) until official release from Microsoft of MSN 5. [no subject] by Menthix on 10-01-2002 at 02:22 PM
Nice, page bookmarked. [no subject] by Patchou on 10-01-2002 at 03:53 PM
Well, Sholin just told me about the release date... I just hope that the API documentation will be released the same day because that's what I need . Anyway, the code will be ready so it will be a one night work for full Messenger 5 compatibility. [no subject] by reisyboy on 10-01-2002 at 06:23 PM give the option of advanced or basic scripting a tick box or one version with one with out. Please [no subject] by Menthix on 10-01-2002 at 08:00 PM
Uhh... you mean, give it a option to disable scripting? [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 10-01-2002 at 08:02 PM As i know nothing about VBscript... can someone tell me, how damaging scripts can be to your computer? For example, someone sends yu a script "hey try this one, its cool!" and you load it onto messenger, and god knows what... would something like that be possible? or not? [no subject] by Gergith on 10-01-2002 at 08:33 PM
Hey Patchou! im glad to see that your back, but there is ONE thing i request of you, EASTER EGGS!!! hehe, who knows, just keep up the great work, and please dont release it before it should be released, which im sure you will do! ya, about the scripting, its your choice, i really dont think that scripting would be too usefull at all! [no subject] by Patchou on 10-01-2002 at 11:53 PM
I've seen that reader, it's really a nice work and it's funny because my first public software was a log viewer for IRC logs. Anyway, for scripting, yes it will be an option (I suppose, disabled by default so you don't have to worry) and no there won't be two different versions of MP2. However, for the scripting dependies (the Windows Scripting Host), I still don't know what to do... do you think I should install it everytime on any system (it won't damage your system.. it will just update it so it's good for security, my concern is that the package is 750Kb) or should I put is as an install option? if it'S an install option, the problem is that you won't be able to enable scripting after install or you will have to go and download the package by yourself on Microsoft web site.. I could jsut give the link... well, tell me what you think. [no subject] by Gergith on 10-02-2002 at 12:31 AM
quote: so your saying that, i could have it so the program is useless cause everything is disabled, yet still running? [no subject] by Muss on 10-02-2002 at 01:33 AM
Patchou, about the progress thing, wouldn't it be better to have it here on the board [no subject] by shine on 10-02-2002 at 04:42 AM
quote: I think you shouldn't include it in MP2. Just provide a link to download from Site as u said. Keeping down the size of MP2 is much better [no subject] by shine on 10-02-2002 at 05:24 AM
quote: Even I'm interested to know more about this. As far as I understood, VB Script is not as powerful as VB and have special object to access your files unlike VB for security reasons. But with thsi Objects it is possible to create havoc in your file system. Could even get your passwords . It depends on how much accessibility is given by Patchou. BECAUSE ultimately plus COULD BE USED AS A MASK by malicious programmers. The trustworthiness of plus could be exploited by them. [no subject] by Menthix on 10-02-2002 at 10:27 AM
quote:Don't supply it as part of MP2, increasing the size of Plus! only for scripting is not a good thing. But windows scripting host is supplied with almost every windows, isn't it? So basicly almost everybody will already have scripting host installed, just an outdated one. Why not disable scripting by default.. then, when somebody decides to enable scripting, let Plus! check if Scripting Host is installed and which version, and if SH is outdated give the user a message about it that is wise to update SH because of possible security flaws in the old SH versions. If SH is not installed give the user a message about that too, and why they will need SH, and where the can download it/ how to install. Either way... be sure you explain the user about the possible risks of scripting, especially when exchanging scripts with other users, the risk is probaly not THAT high, but you don't wanna be blamed for crashed systems/hacked account, do you? For downloading link, just provide a link to the page where Microsoft supplies SH then it won't heart site's bandwith, and users will be sure of the latest version. [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 10-02-2002 at 12:47 PM Someone want to make an official comment on what me and shine said? Or is this an issue not worth worrying about? [no subject] by Menthix on 10-02-2002 at 01:03 PM
The same riscs are also the when people are just excuting VBsript thereselves whitout Plus. So there won't be more riscs then you had before, only with scripting, less experienced people will be using it, that's why it is a good idea to disable scripting by default, so the user can optionaly enable it if he thinks he's experienced enough. Security by Patchou on 10-02-2002 at 01:55 PM
Again, an excellent idea from Jae.... WSH will be downloaded only when Scripting is enabled in the Preferences. By default, it will be disabled. [no subject] by ginge on 10-02-2002 at 03:55 PM
There are two distinct modes for scripts, which is set from the program that calls the script (Plus! in this case), to either trusted or not, in one the script is given access to only the COM objects specifically added by Plus!, in the other it is free to create and use any COM object registered on the system. [no subject] by Patchou on 10-02-2002 at 05:10 PM
I forgot to mention it, thanks ginge... I plan to run the scripts as untrusted to ensure that I'll never receive any complaint from anyone about security. For the installation of WSH, yes it's on most Windows but very often it's not up to date and the worst scenario when you want to run a script is when it does not run tough it works perfectly on your friend's computer and this is due to version mismatch of the script engine. [no subject] by ginge on 10-02-2002 at 05:23 PM
I'm sure people will come up with great things in trusted mode, its just people will always want that little bit more (storing high scores for that text based game, storing them on a central server etc.), its just a case of being careful what you open up. [no subject] by Menthix on 10-02-2002 at 06:03 PM
A little addition to the verion incompatibillity: [no subject] by Patchou on 10-02-2002 at 07:15 PM
Any data associated with the scripts will be in the comments of the script itself... I could add special things but for simplicity reasons, MP2 will consider any script installed in its directory as being usable, that's all. The only information it will display about them in their name. It may change as I'Ve seen that apparently XML tags can be added to VBScript/JScript... we'll see. [no subject] by shine on 10-03-2002 at 04:42 AM Thanks Patchou and ginge for the explanations. Great. We look forward for your success. Thanks again [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 10-03-2002 at 03:07 PM Also, thank you for the explanations Ginge, Patchou, Jae... [no subject] by Chrono on 10-05-2002 at 02:01 AM Nice to see that U are finally working on version 2 Patchou [no subject] by Patchou on 10-05-2002 at 05:24 AM
Of course! ... check this out... [no subject] by surfichris on 10-05-2002 at 11:58 AM
Awesome dude! [no subject] by Kabubi on 10-17-2002 at 09:02 PM Patchou, when u think u will release this version? [no subject] by Patchou on 10-17-2002 at 09:04 PM Public release in about 1 month and half. Beta release in about 3 to 4 weeks.... don't take those numbers too seriously though... [no subject] by reisyboy on 10-17-2002 at 09:25 PM kewl, patchou i knwo its early , but do you intend to improve on version 2.0 2.54 etc and then have you got any plans to have MP3 [no subject] by Johnny_Mac on 10-17-2002 at 09:41 PM 4 weeks = 1 month? [no subject] by Menthix on 10-17-2002 at 10:59 PM
Yeah... 4 weeks used to be a mont back in the old days [no subject] by Add on 10-17-2002 at 11:01 PM
i don't know if this has already been mentioned - i noticed 6 pages of suggestions and i just don't have the time to read them all and check. [no subject] by WDZ on 10-17-2002 at 11:16 PM
quote:I think reisyboy meant Messenger Plus 3.0... [no subject] by Menthix on 10-17-2002 at 11:33 PM
quote:Lolz, guess yur right |