Suggestion: sex! - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: WLM Plus! General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +----- Thread: Suggestion: sex! (/showthread.php?tid=20163) Suggestion: sex! by slipstream3d on 01-06-2004 at 03:51 AM
Heh, subject seems a bit racy, but it's really alright i think. RE: Suggestion: sex! by lylesback2 on 01-06-2004 at 03:58 AM 1 word: privacy... RE: Suggestion: sex! by king_of_cool_kids on 01-06-2004 at 04:01 AM yeah, but if you have a friend, You would know if they were a boy or girl. Like custom names. YOu can set it yourself. RE: Suggestion: sex! by slipstream3d on 01-06-2004 at 04:04 AM
Exactly, it'd be completely local. Hell, I could do the same thing with custom names already. RE: Suggestion: sex! by CookieRevised on 01-06-2004 at 04:06 AM indeed, this has nothing todo with privacy... now you can write notes for each contact. This is just the same, only you tick a box male or female... Well, idea is good, but I don't think it is very practical, thus chances of implementation are nihil... unless Patchou has heaps of time and is bored RE: Suggestion: sex! by king_of_cool_kids on 01-06-2004 at 04:09 AM but it would also mean having to change MSN messengers stff, to get the wrods to change, wouldn't it?? RE: Suggestion: sex! by CookieRevised on 01-06-2004 at 04:25 AM
hmmm... maybe, I dunno 'bout that... I mean, you could reshack it (it's becoming a verb now these days ), but maybe that isn't needed. Hooking and changing the string in memory should work. RE: Suggestion: sex! by ranicx on 01-06-2004 at 04:33 AM
quote: its in ppls profiles anyway im guessing that what ever program that did this would get the info from the msn profile, so if ya dont want ppl to know, just dont have anything in there for that 1.. anyway, hows that a privacy consern, like i walk down the street and ya can see if there male of female, its not like sumthing ya want hidden from anyone RE: Suggestion: sex! by Choli on 01-06-2004 at 04:33 PM
quote:yep, and also we should update our translations... too much work if you can use the contact notes RE: Suggestion: sex! by Anubis on 01-06-2004 at 04:59 PM Yeah...I like the sound of this...I think a plug-in maybe able to do this... RE: Suggestion: sex! by Choli on 01-06-2004 at 05:22 PM a plugin can't do that. that can only be done by Plus! itself RE: Suggestion: sex! by Anubis on 01-06-2004 at 06:23 PM I mean a MSN Messenger Plugin...like Plus! Maybe if Will makes it Messenger Freedom! RE: RE: Suggestion: sex! by lylesback2 on 01-06-2004 at 06:36 PM
quote:umm... then check there profile or ask them... but when msgplus finds it out... i think it's a bad idea... its like a step up for perverts lol RE: Suggestion: sex! by ind3nt on 01-07-2004 at 05:31 AM i dont understand why youd need that ... if the person is on your contact list why would you need it to tell you their gender.. dont you kno if they're a guy or a girl already? and just check their profile if you REALLY want to kno RE: Suggestion: sex! by CookieRevised on 01-07-2004 at 06:01 AM
lylesback2, _indent, you're missing the point I think.... RE: Suggestion: sex! by slipstream3d on 01-07-2004 at 05:13 PM
Yes, that's exactly what I mean, CookieRevised! RE: Suggestion: sex! by CookieRevised on 01-07-2004 at 07:49 PM
quote:Well, that's going on thin ice in privacy land Because then Plus! uses an external source to gather its information. Although the information is public, I can see some people having a problem with this. Anyways, I don't know if it is possible at all to get that info out off the profiles like that.... RE: Suggestion: sex! by lylesback2 on 01-07-2004 at 10:09 PM i still think it's a waste of time... and pedafiles can click female and really be a 40 year old guy. I think it's better not to add this. RE: Suggestion: sex! by CookieRevised on 01-07-2004 at 10:37 PM
quote:I think you're still missing the point of this... Try to reread the thread a couple of times... RE: Suggestion: sex! by EvilSeph on 01-07-2004 at 10:54 PM
This request has nothing to do with privacy..it's all a matter of preference. If you are against this, then you HAVE to be against custom names and contact notes, as it is basically the same thing. RE: Suggestion: sex! by Theo on 01-07-2004 at 10:55 PM
quote: ya x2 fo RE: Suggestion: sex! by CodeChaos on 01-07-2004 at 11:05 PM
See attachment.. RE: Suggestion: sex! by frog on 01-08-2004 at 05:36 AM
i like this idea.. ... RE: RE: Suggestion: sex! by dotNorma on 01-08-2004 at 01:54 PM
quote:More like radio button if u ask me RE: Suggestion: sex! by Choli on 01-08-2004 at 02:19 PM
quote:a radio button can't be unticked and maybe you would like to unselect it, so the best would be 2 checkboxes, that way you also could select both to mean "this person is gay" RE: Suggestion: sex! by xsRush on 01-08-2004 at 02:29 PM
quote:Or it could mean it's a bot RE: Suggestion: sex! by Choli on 01-08-2004 at 02:46 PM
quote:in that case you shouldn't tick any box and plus should display "... has changed its name to..." and that kind of messages (of course only in languages where there is an "it". In spanish, for example, we only have "he" and "she" ) RE: Suggestion: sex! by Vaitork on 01-08-2004 at 03:21 PM
quote: Uhm... Does "eso" sound familiar to you? Anyway it wouldn't be necesary on spanish, since we can use masculine for that matter... Vaitork aparece como desconectado y puede que no conteste. (Masculine is default) SomeGirl aparece como desconectada y puede que no conteste. (The only change) Destructive Child aparece como desconectado y puede que no conteste. (No changes here so default for bots too) RE: Suggestion: sex! by Choli on 01-08-2004 at 03:29 PM
quote: I meant we don't use a different form for he and it (his/its). It's the same here RE: Suggestion: sex! by Vaitork on 01-08-2004 at 03:36 PM
True RE: Suggestion: sex! by Choli on 01-08-2004 at 03:51 PM
quote:the idea is good, but I don't like it very much. I should translate a lot of sentences again Anyway, Patchou sure won't like the idea. He should do a lot of internal changes to Plus (I think)... RE: Suggestion: sex! by BooGhost on 01-08-2004 at 04:35 PM
IT IS GREAT RE: Suggestion: sex! by boonebytes on 01-08-2004 at 10:10 PM Looking at the info on this, in ordr for Patchou to fix this, he'd have to hack 100% into MSN Messenger. The message that you're trying to fix is set in the mslang.dll file, pretty hard to change on the fly IMO, unless someone else has an idea. RE: Suggestion: sex! by Choli on 01-08-2004 at 10:28 PM
quote:I think we are talking about the messages of Plus, not the ones of Messenger, aren't we? RE: RE: Suggestion: sex! by lylesback2 on 01-08-2004 at 10:31 PM
quote:i understand it perfectly fine, im telling you my opinion.... RE: RE: Suggestion: sex! by boonebytes on 01-08-2004 at 10:34 PM
quote:The Messenger Plus messages come back "Contact is now online" for example. The one I think that this convo is about is when you open a new convo window with someone away, at the top it says "So and so may not reply because his or her status is sent to Away." RE: Suggestion: sex! by Vaitork on 01-08-2004 at 10:36 PM
quote: uhm... are we? now that i think about it.. i think boonebytes could be right.. i don't know if it's worth it if Patch has to work that much to figure out such a little thing.. on the other hand, Patchou is well know to take care even of the smaller details so... go Patch&Plus! RE: RE: Suggestion: sex! by boonebytes on 01-08-2004 at 10:38 PM
quote: lol Patch&Plus! Got to love them! Without Plus, I would be lost! RE: RE: Suggestion: sex! by slipstream3d on 01-09-2004 at 01:29 AM
quote: Well, like I at least attempted to say originally, if it's a huge amount of work it may not be worth it at all... however, if it IS in a separate file that hasn't been used yet, getting this thing to work might just open a whole new can of worms RE: RE: Suggestion: sex! by xsRush on 01-09-2004 at 05:35 AM
quote:Sorry, I was going by this picture . I didn't read the whole thread, just went to the last page. I was thinking it was like that little icon. Thought it would use the male/female icons like on the forum. I don't care if it get's put in or not, as long as i can still use Plus! RE: Suggestion: sex! by CookieRevised on 01-09-2004 at 06:50 AM
about translating: RE: Suggestion: sex! by Chrono on 01-09-2004 at 06:58 AM
though it would be a mess cause in the spanish translation we dont use these prefixes.. RE: Suggestion: sex! by CookieRevised on 01-09-2004 at 08:31 AM
quote:But you could translate the whole sentences into those keys, no? MalePrefix=Vaitork aparece como desconectado y puede que no conteste. FemalePrefix=SomeGirl aparece como desconectada y puede que no conteste. BothPrefix=Destructive Child aparece como desconectado y puede que no conteste. Undisclosed=<standard message> ---OFF TOPIC--- quote: * CookieRevised slaps Chrono RE: RE: Suggestion: sex! by Vaitork on 01-09-2004 at 03:10 PM
Or just send it all to hell and change it like this: RE: Suggestion: sex! by Choli on 01-09-2004 at 03:33 PM
quote:that may be good for spanish but not for other languages (like frech, that adds an "e" to form the female gendre) Anyway, I don't like that idea. It's crappy and dodgy Es poco profesional, teniendo en cuenta que la traduccion a espaņol espaņa se caracteriza por su profesionalidad () y por su lenguaje formal y bien escrito RE: Suggestion: sex! by BooGhost on 01-12-2004 at 05:05 PM
quote:not always..... actually this options isn't as smle as before, coz of all the languages RE: RE: Suggestion: sex! by Guido on 01-12-2004 at 06:03 PM
quote:Good idea, we could use the sex icons in the contact info panel and in the contact manager (we should be able to sort by sex too). And translations that have the old translation-style for those strings would don't use the sex, those that use the new one would. RE: Suggestion: sex! by Vantage on 01-16-2004 at 09:17 PM
I agree with bach_m Privacy |