Letting other's know you have Plus! - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: WLM Plus! General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +----- Thread: Letting other's know you have Plus! (/showthread.php?tid=22313) Letting other's know you have Plus! by siebe on 03-07-2004 at 05:38 PM
Hello, RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by CookieRevised on 03-07-2004 at 05:44 PM
Hmmm... has some potential. And it doesn't invade people privacy I think. I like it on the condition that people without Plus! wouldn't see a thing. I mean they wouldn't get any message appearing all the time. RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by KeyStorm on 03-07-2004 at 05:54 PM
If that's possible it's a great suggestion. But I'm afraid of there being any MSN-protocol violation... RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by Choli on 03-07-2004 at 06:10 PM
quote:send a /ping command and you'll get the answer... if you want to do that in a bot, the exact thing you have to send is: quote:you can also add a command in your bot so the user can decide if he wants to receive plus "features" or not. Maybe at some moment, the user wants to receive sounds but if it's too late at night he doesn't want to. so the user just says "!plus on" or "!plus off" to the bot (or whatever syntax you use) about the header, that's too much work for Patchou, because plus doesn't work at that level (with the protocol directly). quote:Plus is done in VC++ 7.1 quote:if you want to notify your contacts, can't you just say "I'm using plus"? quote:just the same... just type /ping and you'll know it you can use plus features or not. quote:that may be a real problem, also if you change what is being sent, ie: quote:maybe the server doesn't know how to handle that or the client at the other end. RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by siebe on 03-07-2004 at 10:41 PM
Oh, don't worry about the server alright, it can handle just about everything.. It doesn't care about what kind of packets are send, as long as the official client can read them, if the content type is unknown to it, it will kind of, discard the message and not show anything. RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by Pappapishu on 03-08-2004 at 12:01 AM i heard of the idea of putting a plus! icon like the webcam one, that would be rather simple and useful! RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by BooGhost on 03-08-2004 at 12:23 AM
quote:yeqh but i do't know why it's not being added well now with the 3rd version comming up it could be thought again RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by Patchou on 03-08-2004 at 03:20 AM
It's a violation of protocol and a violation of privacy. If bots want to know if you have Plus!, they can always send you a ping . RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by siebe on 03-08-2004 at 08:27 AM
I do not see why it's a violation of someone's privacy to be honoust. To give you an example.. Let's say you go the local grocer, and buy banana's.. Everyone in that grocer knows you got banana's.. And it's not like you put them under your jacket "cause you want no one to know you are going to buy banana's". RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by Pappapishu on 03-08-2004 at 11:20 AM but, it could be like the wabcam thing, there could be the choice of letting people know through the icon or disable it! RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by KeyStorm on 03-08-2004 at 03:16 PM
quote:This is the idea, but there's a way to get to it. Not so simple The fact is that it's a violation to ping silently in that way, but I'm sure there should be another way to do this without protocol terms violation. Touching the headers makes it obviously illegal, I'm afraid . Let's say... sending a special character at the end of the name the first time a message sent in a IM-window and the receiver would acknowledge it with sending the character once along with the nickname back (and so each time an im-window is opened or a contact is added to the convo, just like adding the auto-message to the end of the nickname). Of course it can be made optional so you can turn it off or ask the user during the setup if s/he wants to let others know s/he has MP! installed. Nice and clean. PS.: It can be a series of characters so it cannot be easily hacked (microtime seed) RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by siebe on 03-08-2004 at 03:22 PM Nice idea RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by CookieRevised on 03-08-2004 at 04:07 PM
euhmmm... I thought all this would come up.... There is a confusion here... RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by siebe on 03-08-2004 at 04:14 PM
I was discussing bots, not just your contacts. It isn't very handy if you have to /ping each time you want to determine if someone has MP, cause that will be needed. RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by KeyStorm on 03-08-2004 at 04:22 PM
Privacy is not violated as long as there's an option to keep some information private. The way I suggest, violates neither the protocol nor the privacy. If you want to tell others you have MP!, it tells, if you don't there are two ways: quote:I think you didn't get my explanation very well (very likely because of my poor English ) The information, ie the charachters automatically being sent, as long as the option is enabled, tells other MP! users you use MP!. Reglar users don't notice anything. This wuoldn't work as a PING (in the original meaning) but would let others find out if you have MP!. And vice-versa, of course, because, when there's something sent, the client may sent an acknowledge back telling s/he's using MP!, too. JM said: [We have a button that looks like this: feel free to use it]. But editing doesn't send an e-mail notification RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by CookieRevised on 03-08-2004 at 05:56 PM
KeyStorm, that's exactly what I said.... quote:No, not vice versa, there is a small difference. There shouldn't be any acknowledgement. It still isn't: "let's see if someone uses plus!" (ack needs to be send, just like with the /ping)... It still is: "lets tell people I'm using plus!" (both clients send this to eachother, so no acknowledgement; just like sending /ping whenever you send a message, but without the other client responding to it). The client doesn't actively looks for the string. It gets the string parsed. There is a small difference there... The only options that should be available (and turned off by default) is: "Tell others I use Plus!" and "show <something> if others use Plus!". This is indeed very similar of how the webcam-icon works. So anyway, we mean the same... but I was more referring to other posters (including Patchou) who start talking about "let's see if someone is using plus!", which is different. RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by KeyStorm on 03-08-2004 at 06:24 PM
quote:Yeah, I agree. But let's say I open a convo with you, and I don't have MP! installed: nothing will be sent along with my name. So it's rather useless that you send the information I won't parse in any way. If I had sent this information, and you don't have MP! nothing would happen, and I would not know whether you haven't MP! installed or you simply disabled the feature. If we both had MP! (just like we do ) And I opened a convo with you, I'd send the data and you would send your data, since you know my client can parse it. I understand it's simple formality, but that would decrease load in bot servers, for example. The other thing I meant with the sunglasses is to not allow people with this option disabled to see if others have Plus, but I think that would be a little dodgy, as the client should decide, although knowing who uses Plus, whether to show "X has MP!" or not. To manage who does and who doesn't see that you use3 MP is useful, but its kinda overkill, after all, I think. Hope Patchou finds this useful and understands there's no privacy violation RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by CookieRevised on 03-08-2004 at 06:39 PM
quote:No it isn't, you could've installed plus! but disabled the "show I use plus!". So you will know I have Plus!, but I wouldn't know you have it. (that is without the sunglasses-theory) quote:I wouldn't worry about serverload, it would be only a few bytes more with each convo, so... But to implement this like we would see isn't a privacy breach, but it is indeed illegal use of the protocol, so... RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by KeyStorm on 03-08-2004 at 06:43 PM
No, it isn't. in the name one can write whatever one wants, so there's no violation . RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by siebe on 03-08-2004 at 06:44 PM
Well it would give us a reason to start using Plus in BOT2K3.. We never used it untill now (well except for a color function) because we do not want the person using it to be dependend on a piece (very nice piece though) of 3rd party software. RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by Choli on 03-08-2004 at 10:30 PM uff.. too much discussion here .. anyway, for a bot, I still think the best is ask the user to send a command to the bot to enable (or disable if it's enabled by default) plus features or the bot may send Ping? [msgplus] to see it the contact has plus. That's easy, will work with everyone (with plus 2.50+) (no need to upgrade to 3.0) and don't imply changing the nick, cheating with the protocol or storing per each user who used the bot if s/he has or not plus installed. RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by KeyStorm on 03-08-2004 at 10:41 PM
quote: If you use those weird-functional chars (backward status text, wingdings-font), are you cheating with the protocol? Noway. So why should this do so? Well, I think it's a good idea and would open a door to ineroperability and major features for MP! beacuse of a less restrictive compatibility issue RE: Letting other's know you have Plus! by Choli on 03-08-2004 at 11:08 PM
quote:i meant adding those headers, etc... |