Signature - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +---- Forum: Forum & Website (/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +----- Thread: Signature (/showthread.php?tid=22561) Signature by Seiya on 03-13-2004 at 12:18 PM I want to know why they had removed my signature! it did not have nothing of missed in! RE: Signature by Tochjo on 03-13-2004 at 12:18 PM I don't know your signature, but could it have been too big? RE: Signature by musicalmidget on 03-13-2004 at 12:21 PM It obviously violated the forum rules in some way. Have a read of the rules again and see what was wrong. RE: Signature by Choli on 03-13-2004 at 12:23 PM
quote:Did you put something against the rules? RE: Signature by Seiya on 03-13-2004 at 12:26 PM My signature is not big! I it use in several fóruns, nobody complains, exists signature until big that mine! RE: Signature by Mnjul on 03-13-2004 at 12:30 PM Your signature just contains an invalid image...(at least my IE can not load it). Its removal has nothing to do with Plus! forums. That is, Messenger Plus! Forums staff didn't remove it (otherwise you would see a "Signature removed......blah blah blah". Ask your host (http://www.mauricioayalac.kit.net) about this RE: Signature by Tochjo on 03-13-2004 at 12:31 PM
I cannot tell you what was wrong with it, if I don't know what it is. Can you upload it again or something like that? RE: Signature by Seiya on 03-13-2004 at 12:37 PM Why my image is invalid? Its IE cannot be possible not to load my image! I use Windows 98 and Pentium 166 obtain to see, as you I cannot? Www.mauricioayalac.kit.net is MY, not necessary to ask for to nothing me exactly RE: Signature by KeyStorm on 03-13-2004 at 12:51 PM
Maybe you are seeing a cached image. Copy it and upload it to another server that supports "image-stealing". RE: Signature by Choli on 03-13-2004 at 01:10 PM
quote:when he posted his signature was: quote:Notice the link in it I was going to say he was joking because when a mod removes a sig there isn't any link and if says that and also "... due to violation of the rules" However i though that may have changed with the update so i didn't say anything. RE: Signature by Mnjul on 03-13-2004 at 01:17 PM
quote:Yes there is... I am gonna suggest wdz that no one should make his/her signature be like the "Signature removed..." string. So applies for the avatar. RE: Signature by KnightieBoy on 03-13-2004 at 02:08 PM
quote:so he faked his signature? :\ I didn't know that was possible.. But if you remove your own avatar, you get the same thing as when a mod removes your avatar, don't you? RE: Signature by Choli on 03-13-2004 at 02:37 PM
quote:no. When a mod removes your avatar in fact he changes it with the "avatar removed" avatar. (that avatar that has a big red X and blue letters...) quote:good idea, and then he should tell us what are exactly the texts/avatars displayed when a mod removes them RE: Signature by Chrono on 03-13-2004 at 05:16 PM
i removed ur signature (and ill remove it again) cause it is/was way too big. RE: Signature by Mnjul on 03-13-2004 at 05:28 PM It seems that the upgrade made the signature removal text not have the "violation rules" part... RE: Signature by Chrono on 03-13-2004 at 05:37 PM
pobably it was a wdz-customization RE: Signature by Mnjul on 03-13-2004 at 05:47 PM
No complaints about the removal and yeah the complaints about how he could put such a big signature in other places, and yeah, it was way too large... RE: Signature by WDZ on 03-13-2004 at 09:06 PM
I did change the text, because sometimes a signature is removed for a reason that isn't covered by the rules. I also added logging of avatar/sig removals, so now admins can tell if something was actually removed by a moderator, and which moderator it was. RE: Signature by Chrono on 03-13-2004 at 09:18 PM
No one put such signatures to be honest |