Shoutbox

About "Lock Messenger" - Printable Version

-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: WLM Plus! Bug Reports (/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+----- Thread: About "Lock Messenger" (/showthread.php?tid=25844)

About "Lock Messenger" by xiios on 05-23-2004 at 11:11 PM

1) I have two different accounts logged in at the same time using Jnrzloader. Different accounts have different Plus! configurations, but for some reason these accounts cannot be configured to have different lock shortcuts -- different key combinations can be entered allright, but actually only one of them will work, locking both/all accounts at once. I think locking multiple accounts by one keypress should be implemented by making it possible to specify the same shortcut in N number of configs/accounts simultaneously, instead of locking all instances by one certain lock shortcut (and ignoring shortcuts in other configs). Repeating an existing shortcut in another config currently resets the previous one to "None".

2) When locking Messenger, its current status should be checked like this:
   if "Appear Offline" then no change (must not be set to "Away" etc.!);
   else change it (to whatever we have configured it to).
Currently only visible statuses are available for lock-time. What about adding option "Appear Offline" to this list? And what about an option for leaving the status unchanged?

TIA
WinXP Pro Corp SP1
MSN Messenger 6.2.0133
Messenger Plus! 3.00.92
JnrzLoader 6.2.0133


RE: About "Lock Messenger" by Derick11 on 05-23-2004 at 11:30 PM

i think this should be in MSN messenger/general chit chat. but yes, i aggree with you.


RE: About "Lock Messenger" by CookieRevised on 05-23-2004 at 11:52 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Derick11
i think this should be in MSN messenger/general chit chat. but yes, i aggree with you.
point 1 is actually sort of a bug. and that's in the right forum...
point 2 is more a suggestion and should indeed be in GCC