Shoutbox

Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? - Printable Version

-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Tech Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+----- Thread: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? (/showthread.php?tid=29181)

Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by mad_onion on 07-27-2004 at 07:02 PM

I just got service pack 2 today and i was wondering which do you think has made them most difference to xp? basically which is a bigger (by bigger i mean the most added features, not physical disk space taken up, sorry if this was confusing to Kryptonate) update (dont matter if you dont have 2 yet just go on the info you have).


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by Kryptonate on 07-27-2004 at 07:07 PM

the size isn't important, security is what matters.


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by Tochjo on 07-27-2004 at 07:12 PM

But Service Pack 2 is (and will be) the bigger update, though.


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by Kryptonate on 07-27-2004 at 07:13 PM

SP2 will be about 80MB, I don't know for SP1


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by toddy on 07-27-2004 at 07:15 PM

80mb ? when i downloaded it, it was like 250mb


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by ZrednaZ on 07-27-2004 at 08:05 PM

Damn right that SP2 has made more obvious changes than SP1 did... and I hate most of them. :D

1) It installs DirectX 9.0c which isn't compatible with some games

2) It literally forces you to restart your computer just after installing updates (if you choose not to, it will bug you about it every 10 minutes or so)

3) Internet Explorer has become a pain to use with the new built-in popup blocker... the Google bar is much better at this. M$'s new blocker can't even distinguish between 'good' and 'bad' popups. Thank God you can disable it... :^)

4) The new security center is a pain, something that you'll choose to disable instantly after installing the SP. Here's why I hate it: I'm running Norton Internet Security 2003 with everything completely updated (this includes both firewall and antivirus), and the M$ security center was unable to detect this! It kept on saying "Your firewall & antivirus status is unknown.. bla bla". Sometimes it even managed to detect Norton and it was satisfied, but mostly it didn't. :P

5) Even downloads via Internet Explorer have become a pain... you have to first click the bar "A download was blocked. Click here to download the file" before you're permitted to get the file.

I could probably go on, but... |-)

What do you guys think about it anyway?^o)


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by Tochjo on 07-27-2004 at 08:16 PM

I haven't installed SP2 myself yet, but here is what I would like to say anyway.

quote:
Originally posted by ZrednaZ
2) It literally forces you to restart your computer just after installing updates (if you choose not to, it will bug you about it every 10 minutes or so)
The point of an update is that it takes effect. In order to do this, you need to reboot. If you don't reboot, the update is useless. Therefore, this sounds like a logical thing to do.

quote:
Originally posted by ZrednaZ
4) The new security center is a pain, something that you'll choose to disable instantly after installing the SP. Here's why I hate it: I'm running Norton Internet Security 2003 with everything completely updated (this includes both firewall and antivirus), and the M$ security center was unable to detect this!
From what I've heard (don't hold this against me), the pre-release releases have this issue, because no correct program information was delivered by the program company. This should be changed in the final release.

Can't comment on other things yet :)
RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by lopardo on 07-27-2004 at 08:40 PM

SP2... even though I haven't tested it, I have read about the new features. :)


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by jren207 on 07-27-2004 at 09:10 PM

SP 2 is going to be the most likely to have more in it because it has new features like the pop-up blocker, plus updates for other windows components ;)


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by vincerooney on 07-27-2004 at 11:34 PM

Isnt SP2 going to cost money to purchase after 30 free days or something? or was that a rumour? any news on a release date?


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by jren207 on 07-27-2004 at 11:38 PM

Service packs are critical updates and need to be installed. You'll never need to pay for a service pack. If you had to pay then nobody would update windows and computers would get hacked and there would be chaos.


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by lopardo on 07-28-2004 at 01:50 AM

quote:
Originally posted by vincerooney
Isnt SP2 going to cost money to purchase after 30 free days or something? or was that a rumour? any news on a release date?
Service packs are free... well, at least if your copy of Windows is legal :)
RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by toddy on 07-28-2004 at 01:52 AM

i read somewhere about, with this service pack they were gonna block illegal copys of xp ? any1 know if this true or was it just some junk ?

but then again no one should worry, coz u all should have legal copy's. if not shame on you, go out and buy it


RE: Service pack 1 or Service pack 2? by lopardo on 07-28-2004 at 01:53 AM

I guess they'll do the same they did with SP1, some pirated keys will be locked.