Bug in posts - Printable Version

Bug in posts - Printable Version

-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+---- Forum: Forum & Website (/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+----- Thread: Bug in posts (/showthread.php?tid=29681)

Bug in posts by user27089 on 08-09-2004 at 12:56 AM

[Image: attachment.php?pid=288823]

private message message.. ¬_¬ thats all i'm saying.

RE: Bug in posts by .blade// on 08-09-2004 at 01:38 AM

o.O And you think [p msg] looks better?

RE: Bug in posts by user27089 on 08-09-2004 at 01:40 AM

i thin prvmsg, pm or sumit would be better thats just wierd :-/

RE: Bug in posts by Chrono on 08-09-2004 at 01:52 AM

indeed, PM would do it

RE: Bug in posts by RebelSean on 08-09-2004 at 01:54 AM

quote:
Originally posted by traxor
i thin prvmsg, pm or sumit would be better thats just wierd

I think that pm would do. but dz prolly didn't make then and would have to hunt the maker down and get them to make it. (a)

RE: Bug in posts by user27089 on 08-09-2004 at 01:56 AM

quote:
Originally posted by XxRebelSeanxX

quote:
Originally posted by traxor
i thin prvmsg, pm or sumit would be better thats just wierd

I think that pm would do. but dz prolly didn't make then and would have to hunt the maker down and get them to make it.

Not particularly, as it is part of the Forum/Images i think or part of the template. therefore, would only have to edit the single image, guido would do this easy.

RE: Bug in posts by .blade// on 08-09-2004 at 02:06 AM

Wow...that was hard:

[Image: attachment.php?pid=288880]

RE: Bug in posts by user27089 on 08-09-2004 at 02:29 AM

i was thinking more along the lines of:

[Image: test1.gif]

or:

[Image: test2.gif]

RE: Bug in posts by WDZ on 08-09-2004 at 03:15 AM

quote:
Originally posted by traxor

private message message.. ¬_¬ thats all i'm saying.

Oh no, not the whole "irc chat" debate again... :refuck:

* WDZ points at the forum header as an indication of how this thread will turn out. (a)

RE: Bug in posts by Joe on 08-09-2004 at 03:19 AM

pm msg is just fine :refuck:

RE: Bug in posts by bach_m on 08-09-2004 at 03:29 AM

quote:
Originally posted by WDZ

quote:
Originally posted by traxor

private message message.. ¬_¬ thats all i'm saying.
Oh no, not the whole "irc chat" debate again...

* WDZ points at the forum header as an indication of how this thread will turn out.

i think i started that..... :gfdrin:

RE: Bug in posts by user27089 on 08-09-2004 at 03:30 AM

quote:
Originally posted by bach_m

quote:
Originally posted by WDZ

quote:
Originally posted by traxor

private message message.. ¬_¬ thats all i'm saying.
Oh no, not the whole "irc chat" debate again...

* WDZ points at the forum header as an indication of how this thread will turn out.

i think i started that.....

hehehe, i seriously think it should be changed, its gonna be brought up again sooner or later :-/

RE: Bug in posts by RebelSean on 08-09-2004 at 11:24 AM

quote:
Originally posted by WDZ

quote:
Originally posted by traxor

private message message.. ¬_¬ thats all i'm saying.
Oh no, not the whole "irc chat" debate again...

* WDZ points at the forum header as an indication of how this thread will turn out.

quote:
Originally posted by atownjoe
pm msg is just fine

hmm, why not just change it dz, I mean you dont even have to work on it. people have made it for you? :refuck:

* RebelSean says people doing dz's job? :dodgy:

RE: Bug in posts by toddy on 08-09-2004 at 12:14 PM

quote:
Originally posted by XxRebelSeanxX
why not just change it dz

because its fine how it is. Theres no need to change something if its not broken in the first place !!!

RE: Bug in posts by RebelSean on 08-09-2004 at 10:51 PM

It's not broken. Noone says it is/was. I just think that it should be like PM. :refuck:

RE: Bug in posts by user27089 on 08-09-2004 at 10:57 PM

quote:
Originally posted by toddy

quote:
Originally posted by XxRebelSeanxX
why not just change it dz

because its fine how it is. Theres no need to change something if its not broken in the first place !!!

As sean quite rightly said its not broken, it just doesn't make grammatical sence thats all.

RE: Bug in posts by WDZ on 08-09-2004 at 10:58 PM

"PM" isn't enough. Many people won't know what it means.

RE: Bug in posts by RebelSean on 08-09-2004 at 10:59 PM

Then why not, ermmm. Prvt Msg??

RE: Bug in posts by user27089 on 08-09-2004 at 10:59 PM

so then y not prv msg, it says pm in the button anyway, so isn't what you said ruled out by that fact?

RE: Bug in posts by WDZ on 08-09-2004 at 11:01 PM

quote:
Originally posted by traxor
it says pm in the button anyway, so isn't what you said ruled out by that fact?

"PM" ALONE isn't enough. The "msg" makes it more clear.

RE: Bug in posts by user27089 on 08-09-2004 at 11:02 PM

"pmsg" would suffice though would it not?

RE: Bug in posts by .blade// on 08-10-2004 at 01:35 AM

How about we stretch out the window and make it
[Send this person a message through the Private Messaging System!]

... :lol:

RE: Bug in posts by RebelSean on 08-10-2004 at 02:34 AM

quote:
Originally posted by blade
How about we stretch out the window and make it
[Send this person a message through the Private Messaging System!]

...

Thats very dodgy indeed. :dodgy:

RE: Bug in posts by bach_m on 08-10-2004 at 03:46 AM

quote:
Originally posted by XxRebelSeanxX
Prvt Msg

couldn't that mean send a message to a pervert?

traxor would get ALOT of PMs, then :refuck:

RE: Bug in posts by Varish on 08-10-2004 at 05:25 AM

OMFG, thats a good one.

I think pm msg is good, PM might be confusing for some....

RE: Bug in posts by Johnny_Mac on 08-10-2004 at 03:17 PM

Private Message Messenger.

Bah. makes sence to me.

* Johnny_Mac slaps damn picky people around a bit with a large trout.

RE: Bug in posts by user27089 on 08-10-2004 at 03:48 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Johnny_Mac
Private Message Messenger.

Bah. makes sence to me.

* Johnny_Mac slaps damn picky people around a bit with a large trout.

If it is said like that then would it not be pm msgr ? its means private message message.

* user27089 is no pervert.

RE: Bug in posts by Johnny_Mac on 08-10-2004 at 03:51 PM

quote:
Originally posted by traxor
If it is said like that then would it not be pm msgr ?

Who says? It doesnt matter what that says, that what i means... no problems then!

RE: Bug in posts by RebelSean on 08-10-2004 at 09:04 PM

quote:
Originally posted by bach_m

quote:
Originally posted by XxRebelSeanxX
Prvt Msg

couldn't that mean send a message to a pervert?

traxor would get ALOT of PMs, then

Thats so not funny once so ever....... :dodgy:

Blahh, Prvt=Provate Perv=Pervert get the point?k good.....

I think that Priv. Mess. would also be good tho. Tbfh, dz is NEVER goign to change it. :refuck:

We might as well just STOp trying.