Idea for (!IP) - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: WLM Plus! General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +----- Thread: Idea for (!IP) (/showthread.php?tid=30304) Idea for (!IP) by siebe on 08-22-2004 at 03:44 PM
Hello! quote: RE: Idea for (!IP) by CookieRevised on 08-22-2004 at 03:55 PM
There are plugins that add other tags, like (!XIP), and that will show your external IP: EDIT (March 2005): Since Messenger Plus! 3.20.100 these plugins have become obsolete because Messenger Plus! can now list both your internal and external IP's. quote: EDIT (August 2004): Added all the plugins I could find that can do this... sorry Choli RE: Idea for (!IP) by Choli on 08-22-2004 at 03:56 PM
There are better ways of getting your external ip than intercepting if from messenger. You can go to pages like www.whatismyip.com and you'll see it. In fact that is exctly what some plugins do. As long as I know, there are at least 3 plugins that add the (!XIP) tag (or similar) and it shows your external Ip address. If you search external ip, you'll find them quickly. RE: Idea for (!IP) by siebe on 08-22-2004 at 04:01 PM
:/ What is it with "Protocol tampering" with this forum. It is not tampering with the protocol. It is simply intercepting a message. Editing headers in messages, OK, I can understand that, but this is hardly "tampering". RE: Idea for (!IP) by CookieRevised on 08-22-2004 at 04:08 PM
I didn't say that it is tempering with the protocol, I said "Plus! wont use the protocol or temper with it" quote:If our posts came across like flaming then we do apologize... but we didn't flame you at all, not even in the smallest way... RE: Idea for (!IP) by siebe on 08-22-2004 at 04:15 PM
Well obviously Messenger stores it somewhere in memory, doesnt it? That way you wont need the protocol. RE: RE: Idea for (!IP) by CookieRevised on 08-22-2004 at 05:05 PM
quote:1) Did we whine about it? NO, we gave alternatives in an objective manner... 2) Did we ever say that he isn't a protocol-pro? NO 3) Did we ever say his point sucks, is stupid, whatever? NO 4) Did we ever say this can't be done? NO, I said this is not likely to be done in Plus! because of the reason I gave. And that has NOTHING to do with programming but everything with what Patchou has said before on this forum... quote:1) We don't act like we know all about programming... I know some other guy who does act like he knows everything about programming though and act like he is the super god of programming because he can make some good and popular plugin, and that acting pisses me off... thank you... (yes, flame me (us) and I'll flame back) 2) Who says I don't know something about programming? Is it because I never published something in public??? Well, excuse me for not having the knowledge that you have, but I have more knowledge of programming then you think and I don't need to write public programs to proof how much/little I know... quote:Stop your uber-leet-programming beheviour... I said this many times before: you are a good programmer, but that doesn't give you any right to act like the uber-leet-godness-programmer with a much to big ego. Keep your feet on the ground and don't let all the positive remarks (sucking up) because of StuffPlug go to your head, which obviously already has happend... quote:Well, good for you, the plugin and the community. But was it nessecairly to flame us to just say that? RE: Idea for (!IP) by CookieRevised on 08-22-2004 at 05:25 PM
quote:1) He suggested to use the protocol, I only replied what Patchou himself has said in the past about using the protocol.... If there is another method, then Patchou and anybody else will be glad to hear it... but again, no reason to flame... 2) We gave existing alternatives.... 3) We NEVER said that it was crap ffs.... quote:FYI, I'm the last person who is going to flame someone just because they are a member of a certain community. I don't tend to do that at all and never will!! If you think that about me (and others) then you have a very poor judgement of character/people. Furthermore, I never knew Siebe was a member from MSNFanatic... quote:Nice, but for the last time, we never "touched" your friend... chill down... RE: Idea for (!IP) by Patchou on 08-22-2004 at 06:11 PM Wow... calm down everyone. For the IP thing, don't worry about it, I already panned to change it in version 3.10. I won't search the memory for it, I'll simply make an external request to msgplus.net to find out the real external IP as seen by people outside your computer. See? there was no reason to get angry . RE: Idea for (!IP) by Mario Achkar on 08-22-2004 at 06:36 PM Thank u patchou i thought they were going to kill each others at the end lol RE: Idea for (!IP) by bach_m on 08-22-2004 at 07:01 PM
quote: won't people wonder what information is being sent? people will think youve put a trojan on their computer... RE: Idea for (!IP) by RaceProUK on 08-22-2004 at 08:49 PM
quote:A simple ping? Or something a little more? Ping's probably best to reduce the problems of your 5mil+ users overloading the server... RE: Idea for (!IP) by Millenium_edition on 08-22-2004 at 09:24 PM
open a web page is a solution. RE: Idea for (!IP) by Patchou on 08-23-2004 at 12:05 AM well Millenium, that'S exactly what I'm doing (except that I only show the IP and the page is on my server). I doubt anyone will complain about the server connection, its only made when you use the tag so, if you don't like it, don't use it . Works perfectly well btw. I moved the old behaviour to a new (!IPN) tag (for IP Network). Showing IPs of your internal network can still be very useful depending on what you want to do. RE: Idea for (!IP) by RaceProUK on 08-23-2004 at 09:27 AM Someone will moan about it... like they moan about the sponsor being a 'trojan'. RE: Idea for (!IP) by BEWARE^^ on 08-23-2004 at 06:34 PM if they moan about it that it was an trojan then there comps where slowing down or reacting strange RE: Idea for (!IP) by RaceProUK on 08-23-2004 at 09:46 PM Not quite: it's because they didn't read the installer screens, then found something they weren't expecting. Also, some AVs detect a virus-that-isn't in the sponsor. RE: Idea for (!IP) by BEWARE^^ on 08-24-2004 at 12:40 AM but how could that be then normally thats not possible if im right RE: Idea for (!IP) by Choli on 08-24-2004 at 08:54 PM
omg! what a stupid discussion... Anyway, I have to say that I agree with all what Cookie said. quote:I'm not sure if people would like it when their firewall says: "Messenger is doing a connection to bla bla bla...". Anyway, good feature RE: Idea for (!IP) by RaceProUK on 08-24-2004 at 09:55 PM
quote:I see you agree Choli. RE: Idea for (!IP) by Pr0xY on 08-25-2004 at 05:46 PM
quote:Like Patchou said, if someone doesn't like it, all they have to do is NOT USE IT. Very simple solution. RE: Idea for (!IP) by BEWARE^^ on 08-26-2004 at 09:45 PM
quote: I agree with pr0xyboy |