[Suggestion] Auto Responder - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: WLM Plus! General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +----- Thread: [Suggestion] Auto Responder (/showthread.php?tid=32382) [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 10-02-2004 at 10:39 AM
can you implement an auto responder into Messenger plus! please Patchou? the same as what Messenger Discovery has. ive searched everywhere for one but cant find one and i think people who dont want MD or cant get it to work should be able to have one, like me. Messenger Plus! already automatically responds to Ping! commands, why cant it automatically respond to anything you choose? i think it should. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Anubis on 10-02-2004 at 12:05 PM
Yes, it is possible with the Messenger Plus API, very possible. TB made a plugin that did this...But since MD already has this, if you want that feature just use that...at some point Plus! will include it someday probably... quote:What would the point in that be? RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 10-02-2004 at 12:57 PM
MD doesnt work for me and never has.. that's why i cant use that, and i dont want to use it just for one feature anyway RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Anubis on 10-02-2004 at 01:05 PM
quote:True, but most people only have 1 MSN account... RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 10-02-2004 at 01:07 PM doesnt mean that the auto responder shouldnt be able to do that RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Millenium_edition on 10-02-2004 at 04:25 PM
quote:You are completely wrong my friend... the MP! API can not do such stuff... Can I PLEASE ask you to stop talking about programming? quote:by probably hooking the convo window or doing packet sniffing or somethign... RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Anubis on 10-02-2004 at 04:58 PM I believed it used a similar fashion to the /yeahright command...that auto-responds on a new message...therefore I assumed it was possible with the MP API... RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by At0miC on 10-03-2004 at 01:29 PM
Hey, that sounds good m8 I would like to have a feature like this. Work on this one, I can't wait RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 10-06-2004 at 10:38 AM
thanx tim i hope it becomes a feature RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by stuartbennett on 10-13-2004 at 09:40 AM i would like this feature to be added it sounds quite cool. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 10-13-2004 at 10:40 AM yeah, me too. have you read this thread Patchou? what do you think? if no-one makes this as a plugin then would you consider making it as a feature in msg plus!? RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by At0miC on 10-16-2004 at 10:12 AM Yea, I agree RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by stuartbennett on 10-16-2004 at 11:01 AM if i had the skills and abilities which i dont i would do it. but i only know a little bit of java and a little visual basic so unfortunately its beyond my abilities. but if theres anything i can do to help this happen let me know. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 10-20-2004 at 09:12 AM
you can help by getting Patchou to implement this as a feature, hehe RE: RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by stuartbennett on 10-20-2004 at 09:16 AM
quote: the only chance of this ever being implemented as a feature is if patchou reads this thread. unfortunately noone can control the will of others so theres no way for us to make him read this. all we can do is post here and eventually if the thread gets large enough patchou will read it to see whats takinbg up so much of his forums space well thats the idea. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Hordo on 10-21-2004 at 11:27 PM
Although I would want this functionality as well, it's not likely Patchou will do this. He has been asked about this before.. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by stuartbennett on 10-22-2004 at 06:42 AM so are you saying this will never be implemented? or is it just it wont be implemented until people get smarter about what they are installing? RE: RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 10-22-2004 at 01:25 PM
quote:since i have no idea how an auto responder is spyware and i basically have no idea what you're saying, i want Patchou to explain this to me. what securtiy risks are there if when someone says "hello" your messenger replies with "hello" by itself? it does the same with ping comands unless you turn that off. also you would have to set the responder yourself to what it replies to and what it replies with scratch that, i read the thread and still dont understand how it's a security risk. Patchou, please explain RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by At0miC on 10-22-2004 at 02:00 PM
I agree with jaguar, even I don't now him personal. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by stuartbennett on 10-22-2004 at 02:31 PM yeah i dont get how this features a security risk either it makes no sense someone please explain this as to how its a security risk. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 10-29-2004 at 10:49 AM Patchou? RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by CookieRevised on 11-08-2004 at 04:54 PM
quote:Can please stop posting in every possible thread that Patchou should read this?! If everybody is doing it then Patchou wouldn't have time to read anything to the point because of all the spam. Patchou does his best to read everything. He only doesn't reply to everything. Be patient.... RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 11-08-2004 at 11:10 PM Ok, I'll stop. But i don't get it, cause he replies to other threads that are only hours old and have less serious topics (for example: this and this), but he doesn't reply to this topic which is a serious request, it's way older and lots of people have said they like the request and thinks it's a good idea.. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Patchou on 11-08-2004 at 11:50 PM Ok ok I'm here... doing this kind of thing would only be possible if I improved the plugin API to filter every message that's received but I'm still not sure it would be a security wisedecision... maybe later, I don't know. Auto-responder things are often nice little toys foracouple of days and then are completely useless... Plus! already have auto-messages for statuses, I think it's enough for what most people would want to do with this kind of feature . RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 11-09-2004 at 10:01 AM
Hehe, thank you for replying, even though it's bad news for me I'm glad I got to hear something from you. RE: RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Pure_BY on 11-16-2004 at 06:32 AM
quote: Well, Patch, I agree, BUT. I found a usefull way of using auto responders. In fact... It is the only way I would use them: auto respond /close, or even /sevillaugh #/close to some messages, like people sending the URL of their website/poll/blog/online game/whatever other thing that is being sent constantly/regularly/often... Btw... It would also be cool to put things like this in your nickanme: "Got new exclusive cool song of Prophecy - Chill, Relax (I'm back). Type \\get chill relax to download!!!" And responder will be "/dropfile D:\My Documents\My Music\Prophecy\Other\Chill, Relax (I'm Back).mp3" So people can download it even if I'm not behind my PC RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 11-16-2004 at 08:44 AM Yeah, that's a great example of what you can do with an auto responder. Exactly what I had in mind. There are so many things you can do. It's up to you imagination to find out what. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by stuartbennett on 11-16-2004 at 09:07 AM
quote:yes patchou i agree that not everyone may use them, indeed for some they will be toys for a few days then theyll lose interest. however i finally figured out how i would use these. i often get links to tournaments from a league on cases ladder called sdladderranks. they constantly annoy me as i got loads of these links daily. now then i would love it if i could setup an auto responder that whenever a hyperlink containing sdladderranks was sent to me it auto closed the convo. now then whats to say that in x months time i might become a td on that league and want to turn this auto responder off. so maybe design this feature so you can set your auto responders but there should be a list of them somewhere that if the tickjbox is ticked the auto responder will be enabled if not ticked its disabled and not used. you see i could easily identify a link from that tournament league as they all start "http://cgi6.igl.net/tourney/sdladderranks/" then have a tournament number at the end of the link so itd be easy enough. it would just be like a filter for emails. if certain words appear in emails they can be filtered to be other words or filtered out completely they are not security risks so why would this be? RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Patchou on 11-19-2004 at 01:28 AM adding an auto-responder that reacts on some specific words could be interesting, I agree.... I'll add that to my very long todo list RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Concord Dawn on 11-19-2004 at 02:39 AM
quote: I'm starting to think that you might give WDZ a run for his money Patch. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by stuartbennett on 11-19-2004 at 07:17 AM
quote: thank you patchou. quote: how comes you say that then? what plugin does WDZ make? no offence WDZ but there are so many plugins it is extremely hard to keep track of who created which 1. RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Pure_BY on 11-19-2004 at 04:10 PM
quote:Thank you! RE: RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 11-19-2004 at 07:06 PM
quote:Thank you very much. You do mean an auto-responder that replies to words/sentences that you set up yourself, don't you? You would have to set up every single word/sentence that you would want the auto-responder to reply to. (Just like you have to set up the word filter yourself.) RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by Pure_BY on 11-19-2004 at 09:30 PM
quote:Ahm... Isn't that the only way of how an auto-reponder works? RE: [Suggestion] Auto Responder by John on 11-19-2004 at 10:45 PM Yeah, but by the way Patchou said "some specific words" it sounded like he wanted to specify the words himself, and since that's not the point of the auto-responder i was just stating the right point to make sure Patchou understood (which I'm sure he did in the first place, but i was just making sure). |