Curiously, the "3M downloads" in the english version of the download section of msgplus.net are replaced by "2M downloads" in the french version... I know that french people are known to be modest , but I think that this time it's a mistake.

English version :
http://www.msgplus.net/download.php

French version :
http://www.msgplus.net/global.php?lang=fr

Anybody can confirm?

++

quote:

---

Originally posted by apquiche
Curiously, the "3M downloads" in the english version of the download section of msgplus.net are replaced by "2M downloads" in the french version... I know that french people are known to be modest , but I think that this time it's a mistake.

English version :
http://www.msgplus.net/download.php

French version :
http://www.msgplus.net/global.php?lang=fr

Anybody can confirm?

++

---

Well, the count is now 3M but I'm too lazy to edit all the languages for such a small change

i wouldnt class a million more downloads as a small change

oki doki

but you could change the english version, because if Plus! has been downloaded more than 3 millions times, it still has been downloaded more than 2 million times
just kidding... => I know that 3 millions are more attractive than 2

What about a script, that counts the amount of downloads and displays them?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Chaotic_Shield
What about a script, that counts the amount of downloads and displays them?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Patchou
Well, the count is now 3M but I'm too lazy to edit all the languages for such a small change

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Choli
if has to be done editing all the language files.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Guido

quote:

---

Originally posted by Choli
if has to be done editing all the language files.

---

Not necessarily...

---

quote:

---

Patch: why don't you use a variable instead of the number hard coded in the languages (just like with that years variable, etc.)?

---

Hum, I have seen an other mistake in french


I'm french and I don't understand

Hahaha!
Why does it say <--Avant <-- ? Does the button go before?

Edit: I could help translating the page!

The webchat applet was quickly translated by a non-native speaker. We are always happy to hear improvements to the translation

quote:

---

Originally posted by Tochjo
The webchat applet was quickly translated by a non-native speaker. We are always happy to hear improvements to the translation

---

Simply post the correct translations here; it's not like it's a very long document

Insetad of saying «Avant»... it should say «Retour»

«Demandez votre question et êtes patiente, SVP. Si n'est pas de personne est répondre au question, quelqu'un à repondre bientôt. Merci.»
should be :
«Demandez votre question et, SVP, soyez patient. Si personne ne répond à votre question, quelqu'un le fera bientôt. Merci.»

«L'aide pour MSN et Messenger Plus!»
should read :
«Obtenir de l'aide pour MSN et Messenger Plus!»

While chatting:
[ chatting in french ]
should be :
[ vous chattez en français ]

<< Go back to the channel index
should be :
<< Retour
(there is no channel index... just a language index)

And «NOTE: Quand vous fermez cette fenêtre, vous serez déconnecté du chat.»
should be :
«NOTE: Quand vous fermerez cette fenêtre, vous serez déconnecté du chat.»

quote:

---

vous clavardez en français

---

Non car «chatting» n'est pas à l'infinitif...  si on disait «chatter en français» ce serait comme si on donnait une instruction
[No because «chatting» is not at the infinitive (to chat)... if we were saying «chatter en français» it would be as if we were giving an instruction]

Et pour le «quelqu'un d'autre»... je crois que tu a raison!
[As for the «quelqu'un d'autre»... I think you're right!]

Mouais, ben en tout cas c'est pas clavardez, lol, j'ai jamais entendu ce mot. Ca doit être canadien . Je vais demander à ma contact québecoise

Clavardez is not french, i'm thinking it's canadian. I will ask to a canadian contact


edit : yes, she know clavardez too but I don't know that

quote:

---

Originally posted by Goshi
Mouais, ben en tout cas c'est pas clavardez, lol, j'ai jamais entendu ce mot. Ca doit être canadien . Je vais demandez à ma contact québecoise

Clavardez is not french, i'm thinking it's canadian

---

quote:

---

si on disait «chatter en français» ce serait comme si on donnait une instruction

---

clavarder est un néologisme que je trouve plutôt bien

personne m'a parlé de la traduction de cet applet

goshi j't'aime pas

xD

quote:

---

Originally posted by Goshi
Hum, non, c'est à l'infinitif, une instruction serait plutôt du type chattez, non ?

I think that <chatter> is not an instruction but <chattez> is one

---

quote:

---

clavarder est un néologisme que je trouve plutôt bien

---

je le trouve plutôt 'self-explanatory' moi..

PARCE QUEUEEEE
j'rigole, bisou ;p

T'écris jamais en anglais toi....pas juste

Allez hop, sujet clos la traduction est correcte mainenant

Traduction of guillaume is ok, it's done

Sorry, mais on dit pas "demander une question", on dit "poser une question"...

Excusez-moi but we just say "poser une question instead of "demander une question"...

bye
++

[EDIT] And "Obtenir de l'aide..." doesn't fit in the box anymore

quote:

---

Originally posted by apquiche
Sorry, mais on dit pas "demander une question", on dit "poser une question"...

Excusez-moi but we just say "poser une question instead of "demander une question"...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by apquiche
And "Obtenir de l'aide..." doesn't fit in the box anymore

---

Pour l'aide, on pourrait peut-être simplement mettre "Aide pour ..."

Sinon, encore quelques corrections dans la phrase d'accueil:

D'abord, c pas la salon française mais le salon français
ensuite, jaser ça se dit pas vraiment de ce côté-ci de l'atlantique, mais bon, tout le monde comprend
par contre, dater, ça ça existe vraiment pas! On dit vraiment ça au Québec ?

Et pour la dernière phrase, ce serait mieux de mettre:
"Pour vous connecter au chat principal, double-cliquez ici:"

voilà voilà voilà

à propos de jaser, en france on l'utilise aussi mais il n'a pas du tout le même sens...