iPod Mini vs. iRiVER - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +---- Forum: General Chit Chat (/forumdisplay.php?fid=14) +----- Thread: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER (/showthread.php?tid=34739) iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by detn8r on 11-23-2004 at 12:51 AM
OK, so I was looking into getting an MP3 player for Christmas. I wanted to listen in style with an iPod mini, but the iRiVER also caught my attention. RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by .blade// on 11-23-2004 at 01:12 AM
The Ipod Mini is a much better device than the Iriver. It's got a better interface, a long battery life and works very tightly with Itunes RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by TylerG on 11-23-2004 at 01:26 AM
Ok First I highly recomend the iPod. One is because that it works so good with itunes and it is probably the koolest mp3 player on the market. Another thing is you are going way to expensive. The ipod mini is 249$. And I would also suggest that you get an higher gig iPod. They hold tons more and are only a little bigger. RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by detn8r on 11-23-2004 at 01:31 AM I don't _need_ 20GB, and I would also like to save my self the 100 dollars. Also, the difference with batteries is that the iRiVERS is easily replaceable anytime (being a AA). iPod is not. Interface is not a HUGE factor, although it's under consideration. And www.canadacomputers.com are cheaper than Futureshop and BestBuy RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by Underlord on 11-23-2004 at 01:34 AM Go for the Iriver, longer battery, FM radio and voice recorder, it plays WMA, but it is only 1GB . All the other features are better though . RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by .blade// on 11-23-2004 at 01:44 AM
quote: There's no need to replace the battery unless you drain it completly every single day If you use it for say - 4 hours - 5 days a week, then recharge it at night completly, it'll last like 2-3 years. But ya, go for the Ipod, it's much better over-all IMHO, and you'll be much happier with it. RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by TylerG on 11-23-2004 at 01:44 AM No, I am telling you get the iPod. Why would you get an mp3 players for the features. It is for the music. Ok well it is up to you but you will spend tons of money on AA's. Ipod is the best in the world. All in all it is da best RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by Underlord on 11-23-2004 at 01:59 AM
quote:Why is it the 'best'? RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by TylerG on 11-23-2004 at 02:03 AM
It is the coolest because you an hold upto 15000 songs with just 6 0unces when it takes like a hundred pounds of cds RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by ddunk on 11-23-2004 at 02:04 AM
quote: You're comparing an ipod to CD's not a different MP3 player. Theres a huge difference. RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by TylerG on 11-23-2004 at 02:09 AM
Well you got me there I really have nothing against the other mp3s. I just highly recomend the ipod it is really good in my opinion RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by Fraisie on 11-23-2004 at 02:12 AM I have a iPod mini (pink ) and I just love it ! So easy to use, works so so great with iTunes, and the perfect size. The controls are also well very done. RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by .blade// on 11-23-2004 at 02:17 AM
This might help: RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by dotNorma on 11-23-2004 at 03:30 AM
Everyone , I would like you to meet Tyler. He is one of my good friends and I am the one with the iPod he is reffering too. Please welcome him as a member of our community and give him a chance. (He was with me when we set the house on fire.) RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by .blade// on 11-23-2004 at 03:49 AM
quote: I agree that the Ipod is better, but the fact that it's rechargeable isn't the main thing because you can always buy rechargeable AA batteries (though that + the charger would run you anohter $20-$30 CAD). RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by dotNorma on 11-23-2004 at 03:55 AM
Yes , But you would have to buy a battery recharger and additional rechargable batteries. (Which can only be used like twice.) RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by .Roy on 11-23-2004 at 08:51 AM
.. The recorder is the only feature that really interests me in the iRiver.. It can be used a lot when u have a test or something and u can record the notes from your teacher.. as for the batteries... Uhh. you can also get rechargable batteries.. But the ipods batteris sound much beter... RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by saralk on 11-23-2004 at 09:07 AM if were talking about MP3 players, take a look at this RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by eckocomplex on 11-23-2004 at 09:42 AM I'm thinking about buy one of the iRiver portable media things but can't ship them to New Zealand . RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by detn8r on 11-23-2004 at 02:27 PM
Well if Fraisie has one, I must have one RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by .Roy on 11-23-2004 at 02:32 PM hmm.. WEll i agree with you then if people say that its recorder sux.. the i would spend 60 bux for 3 gb RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by FrozernFire on 11-23-2004 at 02:58 PM still the worst thing is about the batteries in the iRiver. normal AA rechargable has quite little power in it, and iRiver will drain it fast. and 1gb of space, that's too little RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by .blade// on 11-23-2004 at 04:35 PM
quote: Actually, my friends Mini Disc player runs off 2 AA batteries which last aprox. 72 hours Ipod is still better over-all, and you CAN buy a voice recorder (if you really want) for it RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by .Roy on 11-23-2004 at 07:02 PM
im talking about a built IN microphone You can almost get a plugin for anything for the ipod.. Just look at the site and click accessories.. Wow I wish i was in charge of the apple store RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by Stigmata on 11-23-2004 at 07:10 PM
wait RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by .blade// on 11-24-2004 at 02:00 AM
quote: That's not the point of the thread (There are LOTS of things competing with the Ipod, including the Sony Hard Drive player [I forget the name], the DELL Jukebox and several other players). RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by Chestah on 11-24-2004 at 05:23 AM
I love the ipod mini's but the fact is that nearly everything else in the mp3 market has better sound quality then it, it has like 83db when other players like the creative Zen Micro has 98db.... i can't remember what measurement that is in. but the ipod mini has about 47% distortion when the creative has 5% distortion! thats the only gay thing RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by FrozernFire on 11-24-2004 at 05:33 AM
quote: rechargable or non-rechargable? quote: the gay thing about zen micro is that it's almost the same price as the iPod G4 20GB here. i also saw zen micro 2 days ago and the screen is real small RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by Chestah on 11-24-2004 at 05:56 AM oh well its got a rechargable and removable battery thats a pro RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by bach_m on 11-24-2004 at 12:02 PM
quote: Not the mini. it doesn't have audio recording ability. Nor does the 4G,oficially quote: Get a highquality pair of 'phones and it pumps out superb sound. And if i'm not mistaken, isn't a Decibel a measure of volume???? and anyways, since Decibels are a logarythmic function, that is a minuscule difference (.72 Db) Also, once the iPod's battery stops working (like ANY rechargable battery), you can buy a replacement one. If it happens withtin the first year (HIGHLY unlikely) you can just send it back to Apple and they'll replace it for u. Otherwise, its easy to change, and there'll be no warrenty to void RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by sasquatch on 11-28-2004 at 03:00 AM
i'd go for the mini just cause it looks cooler then the iRiver in my opinion and the interface is muchhhh better, altho it would be better if it supported wma's, its pretty easy to convert to wma from mp3 if there's no DRM RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by Fergy on 11-28-2004 at 04:39 AM
there was an mp3 player advertised here in Australia RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by Purity on 11-28-2004 at 07:53 AM
k, i dont see y ppl need so much space n e ways RE: iPod Mini vs. iRiVER by Day-V on 11-29-2004 at 02:18 PM
IRiver |