nVidia or ATI? - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Tech Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +----- Thread: nVidia or ATI? (/showthread.php?tid=46676) nVidia or ATI? by TheBlasphemer on 06-22-2005 at 12:48 PM
Right, now before replying, I don't want no "ATI is better because it has had better results in the past", or the like about nVidia. RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-22-2005 at 01:16 PM
OK RE: nVidia or ATI? by RaceProUK on 06-22-2005 at 01:46 PM
* RaceProUK goes to find suitable articles on Tom's Hardware Guide... RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-22-2005 at 01:55 PM
um actually i wouldn't go by what toms hardware sez RE: nVidia or ATI? by surfichris on 06-22-2005 at 02:00 PM
quote:What the hell? In terms of performance the X800 etc series of ATI video cards perform and in some cases even out perform the Nvidia cards. The reviews speak for themselves. quote:What the hell once again? More pipelines perhaps? Higher clock speeds? Better image rendering? quote:I've used quite a few ATI video cards in my time and I've never had any problems like that. quote:That's just crap too - I had to update the drivers of my Nvidia 6800gt the other day to play BF2 and Half-life2 - didn't have to do it on laptop with ATI video card. Now, different cards will perform different on different games. Alot of games these days are optimised for certain cards (such as GTA: SA is now sponsored by Nvidia and is optimised for it more than ATI cards). If you ask me it somewhat comes down to the games you intend to play. Oh, squall, before you call me bias - I am pretty much an Nvidia "fan boy". I just call things how they are. RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-22-2005 at 02:29 PM
depends what drivers you were using in the first place RE: nVidia or ATI? by paperless on 06-22-2005 at 02:37 PM
This battle is useless.... they are both great and have equivalente graphic cards.. RE: nVidia or ATI? by RaceProUK on 06-22-2005 at 02:39 PM
The battle is useless. That's why I posted the links to THG. And since THG uses benchmarking programs and game demos to measure and compare performance, how can the results be anything other than fair? Edit: Please don't start an argument squall, it won't help TB make a decision. However, if you do wish to carry on, at least link us to relevant news articles. RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-22-2005 at 02:47 PM
im not arguing im just saying, check up with someone bigger then toms hardware, you should never base your buy on one review alone, and should check out several, RE: nVidia or ATI? by paperless on 06-22-2005 at 02:50 PM Hum.. no limit... hum... nVidia 6800GT then... its not thaaaat expensive and is very nice. RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-22-2005 at 02:54 PM
Go PCI-E its more future proofed and then you can buy a 7800GTX or ultra when its released RE: nVidia or ATI? by TheBlasphemer on 06-22-2005 at 02:57 PM
quote: Yeah! go Pci-express, spend 500 extra bucks on a new mobo and a new CPU, while you could've bought a similar card on AGP Hmmmmz, what do you guys think of the 6800 Ultra 256mb? It's got 2xDVI (that's what convinced me, I've got two LCD's ) And I can get it from different suppliers, Is there a difference between XFX, Aopen, Asus, and MSI ? and if the prices would be fairly equal, which would be the best pick ? Oh and which one will have a more silent cooler ? RE: nVidia or ATI? by user27089 on 06-22-2005 at 03:19 PM
quote: That sentence there simply contradicts yourself 100%. Okay, I would go for ATi, I have used ATi Radeons & NVidia cards, and I've always noticed several differences in them both, my mate has an nVidia GeForce 6xxx and it is really good (256Mb) & and another has an ATi Radeon 128Mb, and tbfh, there is no major difference between the two, they both run perfectly fine, at pretty much the same rate... In my experience of "gaming" I've always found ATi to be my preferred make of graphics card, most of my computers actually contain an ATi because of this... ATi seems to run lighter games better than some of the really dark games, like Doom 3. But not too many games are that dark, so this aspect doesn't really come to this... RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-22-2005 at 03:28 PM
XFX and Asus is the best manufacturer in that selection RE: nVidia or ATI? by YottabyteWizard on 06-22-2005 at 03:40 PM
I say... go for Nvidia, i know about all the problems leonheart said.... besides, 100% Nvidia fan here RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-22-2005 at 03:57 PM
GO 3DFX RE: nVidia or ATI? by RaceProUK on 06-22-2005 at 04:36 PM
quote:Remember: PCI-Express shows significantly higher performance when compared to even the fastest AGP. RE: nVidia or ATI? by brian on 06-22-2005 at 04:43 PM TB, I would suggest buying a 6800GT (Waaay cheaper!), and overclocking it into Ultra speeds, alot of people had done that (Yes, the 6800GT does have two DVI slots and 256MB of memory). RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-22-2005 at 05:04 PM
doesn't mean zot brian RE: nVidia or ATI? by RaceProUK on 06-22-2005 at 09:14 PM
quote:The Tom's Hardware Guide links I posted earlier. Anyway, what's the point in PCI-Express if it isn't faster than AGP (which must be close to or at it's limit, or why make PCI-Express?). RE: nVidia or ATI? by brian on 06-23-2005 at 12:24 AM Because it's faster, new technologies, SLI. RE: nVidia or ATI? by Tandy on 06-23-2005 at 01:28 AM
Personally, i am about to buy a new computer and i am going to wait on the graphics card because they are about to go down in price by a LOT, so i would wait, then decide on which one you want....Best thing to do is read the reviews on major sites. RE: nVidia or ATI? by FrozernFire on 06-23-2005 at 01:51 AM the nVidia 6800s are going to fall in prices since the 7800s are arriving RE: nVidia or ATI? by kao on 06-23-2005 at 02:18 PM i've always used nvidia's, and never wanted an ATI, because of the problems my friend had with about 4 radeons (driver problems), they're both good at making cards but because of the driver problems my friend had i've always been against ati RE: nVidia or ATI? by lizard.boy on 06-23-2005 at 02:54 PM i find the drivers for my dads radion 9200pro suck balls. I find nvidia's are much better (i have an fx5700le) RE: RE: nVidia or ATI? by Garndell on 06-24-2005 at 04:44 AM
My advice.... buy a nice little Athlon64 or *shudders* a P4 and a nForce4 SLI Motherboard. Then just get a GeForce 6600GT (or 2 for 6800U performance roughly) and if you got P4 you'll need DDR2 Memory too. RE: nVidia or ATI? by Tandy on 06-24-2005 at 04:53 AM
hey that's sorta what i wanna get RE: nVidia or ATI? by Hank on 06-24-2005 at 05:54 AM i got a ATI Radeon x700 an works well, .. i'll never touch an nvidia till i hear promising good reports bout them, RE: nVidia or ATI? by saralk on 06-24-2005 at 09:28 AM
I think it depends on what games you are gonig to play. I have a copy of PCFormat where they did a huge supertest of loads of different graphics cards, and then put a file with detailed tests results on the cover dvd, if i find the CD i will post that excel file. RE: nVidia or ATI? by CookieRevised on 06-24-2005 at 09:33 AM
quote:Indeed. I wouldn't recommend PCIe at all for now, unless you won the lottery so to speak, or always want the latest from the latest. "Performance vs. money"-wise it isn't worth a penny IMO. You're far better of waiting a few more years until the BTX form factor is widely spread and becomes a bit cheaper and then upgrade to that (instead of now spending $500 extra on new mobo and cpu just for the PCIe, and within two years again spending +$1000 on new PC with BTX layout) For more about PCIe see this excellent article: http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=1087 ---- As for ATI vs nVidea, I believe the choice is simply personal. I've used both and both are excellent manufactures and it will only come down to money vs. what you get for that money. So I think the best thing to do is to fix the amount of money you want to spend and and then search for cards for that money from both manufactures and then start comparing the features, not vice versa... quote:I couldn't say it any better... RE: nVidia or ATI? by Garndell on 06-24-2005 at 09:48 AM
quote: You will want to look at a 400W PSU at least for the 6800 Ultra. nForce4 has PCI-Express, SATA-II (which has NCQ for added performance on supported drives) and compatability with Dual Core Athlon64's too. The KT800 (AGP) & KT890 (PCI-Express) are very good chipsets, while not having the features of the nForce 4 they perform just as good. If you can get Dual Chanel Memory as it will double the Memory Bandwidth from 3.2 GB/s to 6.4 GB/s. quote: Yes, the X700 Pro is a good card, the replacement for the sub standard X600, just a shame ATI couldn't put the X700XT into production. Consider this a good report for nVidia's 6xxx series. I use a 6600GT & a 6800GT with no problems at all, unlike my X800 which never has played nicely. I'm a PC Engineer by trade and right now nVidia would get my vote and will hopefully reclaim second place in the Graphics chipset market (Intel are in 1st place ). RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-24-2005 at 11:13 AM
its users preference in the end RE: nVidia or ATI? by YottabyteWizard on 06-24-2005 at 02:29 PM I just saw tech features and images of the GeForce 7xxx series. OMG. Nvidia RLZ. (BTW, are they still going to produce AGP video cards?.. no PCIe here...) RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-24-2005 at 02:40 PM
nvidia won't give any information out on unreleased cards, so we don't know if an agp model is in the works RE: nVidia or ATI? by RaceProUK on 06-24-2005 at 04:51 PM From what I've read, NVidia aren't doing an AGP version of the 7800, only PCI-Express. However, as there's still a large number of AGP mobos in use, I expect at least one of the lesser models in the 7xxx range to be AGP. RE: nVidia or ATI? by squall_leonhart69r on 06-24-2005 at 05:10 PM
don't believe what you've read dude, |