Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: WLM Plus! Bug Reports (/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +----- Thread: Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock (/showthread.php?tid=46839) Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock by lopardo on 06-25-2005 at 06:13 PM
I found a bug with the Boss Protection and Messenger Lock features, check this out.
Also, with StuffPlug's polygamy option enabled, I opened two Messenger instances, signed into two different accounts, and set the same Boss Protection and Messenger Lock shortcuts. Calling the shortcuts worked fine, both instances were hidden. But if I disable Boss Protection and Messenger Lock in one of the accounts, then it stops working for both of them. OK, I hope everything I explained is understandable See you, lopardo. BTW, Patch, how do you mute Messenger's sounds while the user is in Boss Protection mode? It's interesting for a plugin I'm making. RE: Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock by CookieRevised on 06-25-2005 at 06:54 PM
quote:This is not a bug, but by design. Though, it would indeed be good to see a registry setting for this (something like "BossProtectionAlways"; along the line of the already existing AutoAwayAlways). quote:correct, but reported before... (although I can't seem to find the thread in an instant) RE: Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock by RaceProUK on 06-25-2005 at 07:01 PM
Is it maybe because Boss Protection and Messenger Lock are designed to work on all instances of Messenger? Would make sense. RE: Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock by lopardo on 06-25-2005 at 07:36 PM
quote:Yeah, but it's not the same as AutoAwayAlways. It doesn't make sense as "hidden" reg. setting. I think it's a bug, "appear offline" isn't a status like the others (people can't see you while you "appear offline"). quote:Huh? It works on all instances (as it should), but it stops working on all instances if one of them has Boss Protection or Messenger Lock disabled (it should probably hide or lock only one in this case). Maybe the Boss Protection should be global. RE: RE: Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock by CookieRevised on 06-25-2005 at 07:48 PM
quote:Nope it is by design; It would be a very stupid and strange bug to be overlooked otherwise (IMO). "offline" is a status just like any other status and when you activate the boss protection, the boss protection simply changes your status, it doesn't check what your status is atm. It is exactly like "AutoAwayAlways" because that also defines/limits the function to only a specific status which must be/must not be in action. If this isn't added as a "hidden" registry key, then "AutoAwayAlways" must also be made into a proper "not hidden" option IMHO. RE: Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock by Sunshine on 06-25-2005 at 08:06 PM
quote:I think you mean this one: Polygamy + Boss Protection Bug (i remember the two of us trying to figure that one out ) RE: Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock by lopardo on 06-25-2005 at 08:07 PM
It's always hard to discuss with you quote:How do you know? quote:Nobody's perfect. Patchou is human and could have simply forgotten about this, if he was perfect we wouldn't have this subforum. quote:I saw this one coming... Yes, technically, it's just another status, but it's the only one in which your contacts can't see you or talk to you, so it's a special status. Therefore, the Boss Protection and Messenger Lock features should check before changing your status. If you're in offline mode, it's because you don't want to talk or be seen. Let's say I wanna go the bathroom and a friend of mine is here. I lock Messenger with a password so he can't use it. I was in offline mode because I didn't want to talk to someone or I didn't want someone to know I was online for some reason . Now my contacts see I'm online. But I do want MsgPlus to change my status when I'm in online mode and use this feature. quote:That's why I'm posting this. quote:It's not the same. It does something similar, but the context is different. Why should that "be made into a proper "not hidden" option"? They are different things. When you make a program, you have to think which options you want to put in the GUI. You have to draw the line somewhere, you have to get a balance between functionality and easy of use. Otherwise you get a dialog with a thousand checkboxes for trivial options that make the important ones hard to find. IMHO, the best solution for this would be if the Boss Protection and the Messenger Lock features only changed to the selected status if the current one wasn't "Appear offline". Then there could be a reg key to put it back as it is now. RE: Bug in Boss Protection and Messenger Lock by CookieRevised on 06-25-2005 at 08:29 PM
To answer both questions of "how do you know it is by design" and the (not) adding as a "hidden" setting: one of my arguments is that this beheviour was exatly the same for the auto-away as it is now for the Boss Protection, until Patchou added that registry key... Both that situation and this one is the same; it both will limit an action to only a specific status or statusses. quote:Fictious quote of how it could be: quote: anyways, we both agree it will be a good feature, no matter how it is implemented, right? |