Shoutbox

Windows Vista - Printable Version

-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Tech Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+----- Thread: Windows Vista (/showthread.php?tid=53072)

Windows Vista by Elessar on 11-18-2005 at 08:35 AM

Has anyone seen the previews for the next version of Windows? I, myself have seen very few screenshots since I first found out what it was code-named. What do people think of the new Windows style? I, myself like the design but don't know much about how it will be so different from Windows XP.


RE: Windows Vista by Hank on 11-18-2005 at 08:40 AM

it wont be so different by a large margin from XP.. unless u have a 256MB card ( Video card) or More it'll work fine,, for screenshots of it, search google for them,

Screenshots can Be Found here

More Can Be Found Here http://www.only4gurus.com/v3/longhorn.asp

HardWare Requirements  http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/eva...ware/vistarpc.mspx


RE: Windows Vista by Savior on 11-18-2005 at 08:55 PM

If you can run Windows XP or on your machine you will be fine with Windows Vista.


RE: Windows Vista by stoshrocket on 11-18-2005 at 08:58 PM

i loooove the new design, heard about the boot up times/new sleep things; i know its old news but i think its cool, my comp takes AGES to load up. I was thinking bout getting it instead of windows xp with my new computer i am building but im not too sure when its coming/if its out yet...


RE: Windows Vista by John Anderton on 11-18-2005 at 09:22 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Methos2
heard about the boot up times/new sleep things;
Best comment so far ....
"3 secs !!?! Do they mean that on a home pc or one with 4 quad ram ??? :dodgy:"

:P Thats what i feel too ;)
RE: Windows Vista by stoshrocket on 11-18-2005 at 09:28 PM

well... it just says three secs, but with the sound of this new thing they are putting in, sleep or somthing, doesnt look like ill be shutting it down anyway, background tasks AND low power!!!


RE: Windows Vista by hmaster on 11-18-2005 at 09:32 PM

Official Site:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/default.mspx

Looks cool, but i read a "out in 2008" thread somewhere..


RE: Windows Vista by stoshrocket on 11-18-2005 at 09:34 PM

nah, i think that is the suggetsion to businesses, that about them not HAVING to get it yet, but can hold out till 2008, i think it shoudl be out before then


RE: Windows Vista by x2zen on 11-18-2005 at 09:38 PM

quote:
Originally posted by hmaster
but i read a "out in 2008" thread somewhere
Wrong, the thread you are talking about was about when Vista is released cristmas time 2006 companies should not make a rush out of upgrading to Vista untill 2008, and it was NOT a MS guy who said it :)
RE: Windows Vista by hmaster on 11-18-2005 at 09:41 PM

oh right.. still i think they should change the name before release (A) :P


RE: Windows Vista by stoshrocket on 11-18-2005 at 09:43 PM

quote:
oh right.. still i think they should change the name before release 


<gasp>! why!? i love the name!!! ok then, ideas that microsoft can call it then people!
RE: Windows Vista by ShawnZ on 11-19-2005 at 05:22 PM

quote:
Originally posted by John Anderton
quote:
Originally posted by Methos2
heard about the boot up times/new sleep things;
Best comment so far ....
"3 secs !!?! Do they mean that on a home pc or one with 4 quad ram ??? :dodgy:"

:P Thats what i feel too ;)

Start-up is three seconds... even on my 256mb box
RE: Windows Vista by albert on 11-19-2005 at 06:13 PM

:| 3 secs for startup? :| that I would like to see!! :|


RE: Windows Vista by stoshrocket on 11-19-2005 at 07:18 PM

quote:
    quote:Originally posted by John Anderton

        quote:Originally posted by Methos2
        heard about the boot up times/new sleep things;

    Best comment so far ....
    "3 secs !!?! Do they mean that on a home pc or one with 4 quad ram ??? "

    Thats what i feel too



Start-up is three seconds... even on my 256mb box


i thought it wasnt out till end of 2006 or am i missing something?

RE: Windows Vista by ShawnZ on 11-19-2005 at 07:31 PM

bad quote/


RE: Windows Vista by rav0 on 11-20-2005 at 08:45 AM

"three seconds" - I haven't even seen a POST complete in that


RE: Windows Vista by Hank on 11-20-2005 at 09:57 AM

not eveen linux/unix can startup in 3 seconds,  or does he mean 3 seconds faster than XP starts?


RE: Windows Vista by rav0 on 11-20-2005 at 10:11 AM

Whoever said it said something like turning on and off as reliably as a TV, in two or three seconds.


RE: Windows Vista by ShawnZ on 11-21-2005 at 01:21 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Animal
not eveen linux/unix can startup in 3 seconds,  or does he mean 3 seconds faster than XP starts?
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA.
RE: Windows Vista by Hank on 11-21-2005 at 03:26 AM

u r Funny eh Shawnz,  3 soconds, either your stonned or Just Love Windows that much you'd say just about anything huh to make it sound good,


RE: Windows Vista by ddunk on 11-21-2005 at 03:30 AM

Uhh, his main OS is ubuntu.


RE: Windows Vista by Hank on 11-21-2005 at 03:39 AM

aww that would Explain it,, but correct me if im wrong,, Mandriva so far is the fastaest one that has Fast Bootup times compared to Suse an Ubuntu, what does shawnz use a low end lightweight Window Manager, anyway im not gonna ask since its going OT


RE: Windows Vista by Elessar on 11-21-2005 at 07:25 AM

From the few screenshots I've seen I really like the new style. But I'm little confused about the boot times:P, and the file system that will be implemented.

How much different will the new Windows be compared to XP?


RE: Windows Vista by Hank on 11-21-2005 at 07:58 AM

More of a Resource Hog than XP in other words Explains to you about WinFS FileSystem


RE: Windows Vista by stoshrocket on 11-21-2005 at 03:42 PM

its not going to be much different apparently, its just going to use up your graphics card to make animations/3d stuff on your desktop, going to be more reliable, all the usual bull that microsoft spit out when a new version is brought out. ;)(A)