![]() BOOT Screens - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Tech Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +----- Thread: BOOT Screens (/showthread.php?tid=53089) BOOT Screens by mwe99 on 11-18-2005 at 10:15 PM
Can i legally modify my bootscreen? I know programs such as Style XP offer this, i was just wondering if it was legal home and business users etc? RE: BOOT Screens by RebelSean on 11-18-2005 at 10:22 PM Why would it be? RE: BOOT Screens by lordy on 11-18-2005 at 10:32 PM
why wouldnt it be? RE: BOOT Screens by lizard.boy on 11-18-2005 at 11:19 PM its not really illegal. its just unsupported and sometimes risky. you can do it with a free bootscreen from stardock if you want to. RE: BOOT Screens by mwe99 on 11-18-2005 at 11:20 PM Yeah i read about that, i was just more concerned over does it invaidate the EULA (as i'd be using it at college/work), i checked out a copy but couldnt see anything specific. RE: BOOT Screens by M73A on 11-18-2005 at 11:21 PM
quote: i used to use that... i did create my own using the proper programs etc etc... the right amount of colours but it still managed to crash my windows boot up.... can be sorted by going into safe mode but its still annoying that it happens! RE: BOOT Screens by lizard.boy on 11-18-2005 at 11:36 PM i've only tested the stardock version in a virtual machine. it worked flawlessly (almost.. minor graphical glitch with the progress bar) RE: BOOT Screens by Hank on 11-19-2005 at 12:32 AM i wouldnt be Playing around with your Boot Screen, means disaster if you do that, unless you backup everything before doing so RE: BOOT Screens by DJeX on 11-19-2005 at 12:53 AM
I've changed my boot screen many times and have had no problems. RE: BOOT Screens by Pyro on 11-19-2005 at 12:55 AM
i have done my bootscreen and tryed moding it, skining it, that Xpize thing (i'm using a 64 bit computer), windows vista skin patch. ect. ect. RE: BOOT Screens by mwe99 on 11-19-2005 at 01:14 AM
Im not asking whether I should or should not do it... YA_MUM... quote: RE: BOOT Screens by ShawnZ on 11-19-2005 at 02:35 AM
quote: Yes it is... it requires patching of windows... RE: BOOT Screens by Underlord on 11-19-2005 at 04:50 AM
It doesn't require any patching. quote: RE: BOOT Screens by ShawnZ on 11-19-2005 at 04:53 AM
quote: Bootscreen changers patch ntoskrnl, they don't use /BOOTLOGO (which i've never even heard of ![]() RE: BOOT Screens by Underlord on 11-19-2005 at 05:15 AM
Hmm. Well i haven't actually tried it. Someone might want to see if it works. RE: BOOT Screens by YottabyteWizard on 11-19-2005 at 06:28 AM
I have ALL stardock software, using everythign at the same time (almost everyhintg) and got no problems. BootSkin is safe. But i think it does patch. If you use BootSkin and the something (virus or anything (BootSkin doesnt mess anything and dont have a virus, im just giving some general examples)) mess up your computer, then you make a reinall of Windows OS then when you boot the original Windows Logo will afear for some seconds, and then it will change (while continue the loading of WIndows) to the new one. RE: BOOT Screens by rav0 on 11-19-2005 at 12:20 PM
I second using BootSkin. There are heaps of boot screens for it published, and it is easy to make your own as well. |