401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: WLM Plus! General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=23) +----- Thread: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! (/showthread.php?tid=53220) 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by Menthix on 11-23-2005 at 03:02 PM
I think all the signatures from the petition back in August had effect again .
If you want to try it yourself, download the latest version of Microsoft AntiSpyware here. Nice to see how all our signatures seem to have effect. I wonder if Patchou ever had any official feedback from Microsoft? And remember...
RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by DJKAL on 11-23-2005 at 03:37 PM
wooo hoooo glad to hear that mesg plus! is safe RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by absorbation on 11-23-2005 at 04:21 PM Very good and important news. I will be posting this. RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by user27089 on 11-23-2005 at 04:25 PM That's good I guess... Apart from where it says "it may require some of these components to function", what if some person deletes some malicious looking *.dll's? RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by John Anderton on 11-23-2005 at 04:37 PM
quote:Yeah thats what im worried about too Anyways this is a good thing RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by L. Coyote on 11-23-2005 at 05:58 PM
quote:A little at a time, I guess. This is another big step they took, and we should give them some credit. Hopefully, more things will be cleared up. RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by Matti on 11-23-2005 at 06:20 PM
Yeah! Microsoft did it! RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by Fraisie on 11-23-2005 at 08:27 PM
That is great news ! RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by Negro_Joe on 11-23-2005 at 08:29 PM Good News, i wonder hat patchou has to say about this... RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by Menthix on 11-24-2005 at 12:01 AM I mailed him, so he will probably comment on it when he has the time . RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by qgroessl on 11-24-2005 at 12:04 AM Next step is for it to not be a moderate threat ... Then the next step after that should be not detecting it at all!... It's really no harm at all! RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by Mnjul on 11-24-2005 at 01:09 PM That's a great piece of news... Now Microsoft finally know what they're doing ;P RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by ShawnZ on 11-24-2005 at 01:09 PM I wonder if it actually detects the spyware though? =p RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by Menthix on 11-24-2005 at 04:00 PM
quote:It asks you if you want to allow several programs in your startup when you install the sponsor, but i didn't see a real warning with the realtime scanner. Manual scan sees the C2Media package as a generic lop.com package (high threat). But that has never been a problem, AntySpyware is right to at least warn when people install the sponsor. RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by linx05 on 11-27-2005 at 02:57 PM
Wow very nice. They were all sent at once weren't they? Or gradually sent each day/week? RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by CookieRevised on 11-27-2005 at 03:12 PM
quote:See the links in the first post in this thread ---------- And sorry if I don't share the same enthiousiasm of this news, because: quote:Errrmm... if there is one thing which nobody had a problem with than it was that the setup is picked up as a bundler!! Afterall, this is the only executable that contains bundled software and should be detected, not the rest (hence what the petition was about AFAIK)... quote:Wasn't that one of the problems? That msgplus.exe itself was flagged (instead of the setup)? So it was changed? quote:Msgplus.exe has got nothing todo with the sponsor, so it shouldn't be detected, sponsor installed or not. So, In my POV, not much has changed appart from removing the warning "a software budler is trying to install" when executing msgplus.exe. The logical and big issue isn't touched at all: that msgplus.exe is totally harmless and that it is only msgplus-setup.exe which needs to be flagged... RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by Menthix on 11-27-2005 at 03:33 PM
quote:That was already changed in the past. So no change there. I agree, the biggest problem that remains is msgplus.exe still being detected (only in manual scan) as a threat, even when the sponsor wasn't installed at all. RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by jren207 on 11-27-2005 at 08:57 PM I'm glad to see that the great effort of many plus! users has not gone to waste and is still making sure that plus! is recognised for the great add-in that it is and not recognised as a threat. RE: 401,683 signatures paid of, Microsoft AntiSpyware steps back AGAIN! by Chrono on 11-27-2005 at 10:18 PM great news! |