Plus Code Release? - Printable Version
-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: WLM Plus! General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+----- Thread: Plus Code Release? (/showthread.php?tid=54099)
Plus Code Release? by chrome_gecko on 12-20-2005 at 03:17 PM
Hi guys,
havent been here in a while, so i'm just wondering, was there ever any code released by Patchou in an open-source way?
RE: Plus Code Release? by user27089 on 12-20-2005 at 03:20 PM
I think there was in the early versions once (as in version 1), but I doubt you could get hold of it anywhere...
Since I have been on the forum (Nov 2003 v.2) I haven't known of Patchou releasing any, and I doubt he will.
RE: Plus Code Release? by WDZ on 12-20-2005 at 03:35 PM
There's this: XP Theme support for Richedit controls
But it's not related to MsgPlus or Messenger. 
Also, he posted the code of his "global hook function" in September 2004... http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showpost.php?p=267616&postcount=31
RE: Plus Code Release? by Menthix on 12-20-2005 at 03:41 PM
Patchou wanted to do that in the past, but people started complaining even before a single line of code was released. AFAIK there has never been a single line of code released to the general public EDIT: Look at WDZ's post 
.
Read through the topics:
Messenger Plus! Code Sharing, what's your opinion about it? (MSN Fanatic forum)
Knowledge sharing - troubles
Knowledge sharing - replies
Let's talk again about code sharing
Personal Message
I'm not sure Patch wants to give it another try. Would be very nice of him if he did, but I can understand the reasons not to do it.
RE: Plus Code Release? by CookieRevised on 12-20-2005 at 05:29 PM
Note that, if you search hard enough on various forums etc, you can actually find many snippets of portions of source of MsgPlus on the net.
He posted more than only his "global hook function" in September 2004. Also, the things you'll find are not complete and/or are of course old and may have been modified by now.
