Shoutbox

[Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... - Printable Version

-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: Scripting (/forumdisplay.php?fid=39)
+----- Thread: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... (/showthread.php?tid=62472)

[Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by tbcat on 07-03-2006 at 11:50 PM

As many must already know the popular plugin stuffplug is going to release a new version for WLM 8 (now not as a plus plugin but as an independent program), however it was announced that both closed windows and open windows notifier will not be anymore...

That's because it worked with "when a user begin his connection with other user" and "when a user finish his connection with other user", and that's not neccesary when a user open or close a windows (for example if you see his space or his avatar the connection begins and if you donīt talk for a while, even without closing the window, the connection is finished)

However, as you can see in many msn forums, it was only a matter of getting used to it and to know it wasnīt 100% accurate... It was really useful anyway...

Is there a way (and someone who wants to do it ^_^) to make a script that notify when a connection with other user begins or finishes?


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by DarkMe on 07-03-2006 at 11:55 PM

I think it already exists thay have released it.

It's http://shoutbox.menthix.net/attachment.php?pid=685671

I think it's the script you search


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by tbcat on 07-04-2006 at 03:01 AM

Now I see there were many topics about this :P

But the link you put was only a joke script that only opened the alert when YOU opened a window :P

Has someone made a "connection stablished/lost" script that really worked? (the name is because I donīt want to argue with people who say that it doesnīt work, because I understand what they say, but I want it all the same XD)


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by DeatzoSeol on 07-04-2006 at 07:12 AM

Many Many many people ask for it.
It doesn't work, and will never work.
So, I don't think this feature will ever come back. And I don't expect that there will be someone out there friendly enough to reintroduce it...*-)
Face it.8-|


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by tbcat on 07-04-2006 at 07:27 AM

It worked its way... But I donīt want to make this topic a war between people who say it worked and people who donīt (that's why I asked for a "connection stablished/lost script" and not a "open/closed windows script" ^_^)


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by DeatzoSeol on 07-04-2006 at 07:44 AM

Yeah, i know it worked, it did work sometimes for me too - often enough to make it acceptably reliable to me.
However, if you search the forums of Stuffplug for example: such requests made all developers so angry they decided to never reintroduce it again ;)
Face it, no one is gonna waste their breath to that:(


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by icepick66 on 07-04-2006 at 01:00 PM

if 2 people had the same program, the program could send a silent message to the other persont that thay have opend the window, and if they other person has that program, itll disaplay it as a toast, saying...

babab@hot.com has opend a windows with you


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by tbcat on 07-04-2006 at 05:56 PM

But that's not the idea... even that script existed less than 1% of your contact list would have it :(

And I donīt understand why if so many people ask for it somebody would not do it... but well, I will try to see if I can do it myself (I dunno XD)

I even had a few ideas how to make it A BIT more reliable, for example, if 1 o 2 minutes passed between the last messege, desactivate the "connection lost" notify... This way most "automatic connection finished" would not give a false "close window" notify... It wouldnīt be 100% accurate either, I know, but well... It's an improvement...

About the "connection stablished" notify, you always have the "contact is writing a message" message to know if the other contact really had opened the window and is going to talk with you... Although this donīt work if the other opened the window but wasnīt going to talk with you (yeah there are crazy people out there XD), so I wouldnīt make the script to wait for that...

(please donīt make this topic a war about "if it work" or "why would someone use it" or "nobody is going to do it", there are just too many topics about that in the forum. Instead make this topic a topic to talk about the script itself and how to make it the best we can for people who want it... And about people who think it's useless, just try to think this topic as a lot of crazy people talking about useless things but happy about that :P)


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by Thor on 07-04-2006 at 06:02 PM

Anyway it's just not reliable. The feature can't be trusted, but if it was reliable I would have used it. :)


RE: RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by CookieRevised on 07-04-2006 at 06:53 PM

quote:
Originally posted by tbcat
And I donīt understand why if so many people ask for it somebody would not do it...
several reasons, but the main one would be that many people (the majority) will interpret the function of such a plugin/addon/script in the wrong way. And there is nothing more frustarting than explaning to people again and again how things work. So in the end, most developpers simply don't even want to talk about it anymore, let alone make something like that or make it public.

quote:
Originally posted by tbcat
I even had a few ideas how to make it A BIT more reliable, for example, if 1 o 2 minutes passed between the last messege, desactivate the "connection lost" notify... This way most "automatic connection finished" would not give a false "close window" notify... It wouldnīt be 100% accurate either, I know, but well... It's an improvement...
The time-outs for the sessions are somewhat known, but MS has changed them from time to time. Making something that will ignore everything after x minutes will not be good because:
a) the timeout could actually be less than those x minutes for all you know (only those who are very familiar with the protocol know the timeout value; aka don't guess such stuff, research it).
b) no end of session will be reported back after the x minutes, even if the end of session was caused by the contact itself

You can argue that it would notify the user and it would always be accurate if you implemented your own time-out after x minutes. Although this is true, it would not be as usefull and accurate as when you actually use the real timeout. Not to mention that without knowing the real time-out, all you still do is guessing (but this time guessing what the time-out might be).

quote:
Originally posted by tbcat
About the "connection stablished" notify, you always have the "contact is writing a message" message to know if the other contact really had opened the window and is going to talk with you... Although this donīt work if the other opened the window but wasnīt going to talk with you (yeah there are crazy people out there XD), so I wouldnīt make the script to wait for that...
That message can also easly be disabled with many patches btw.

quote:
Originally posted by tbcat
talk about the script itself and how to make it the best we can for people who want it...
best way? Study the protocol and stick to it. Don't implement stuff which is guessed or which needs interpretations.

quote:
Originally posted by tbcat
And about people who think it's useless, just try to think this topic as a lot of crazy people talking about useless things but happy about that :P)
The subject of the topic is serious enough to debate about it. This is still and always will be a serious forum where in the first place support is given and thus where information needs to be posted as accurate as possible without the possebility of misconceptions.

------

To make what you want, start by studying the protocol. Info about the protocol or links to it (and sessions in particular) can be found on many messenger related sites. (PS: not many people can deal with the protocol. This means something: it isn't easy to get it right!! success...)... After that, study how packet sniffers work.
RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by tbcat on 07-04-2006 at 08:17 PM

Ok, thanks for the info ^_^

(by the way, I moderate a forum as well (not an msn forum, but an anime forum XD) and I know how frustrating it is to answer/explain the same thing thousends of time, that's why a recommend to name the script the way a I did and not a "open windows convo", but I think, as you say, that a lot of people will misunderstand it all the same... Even though I still think that that's not a reason to just donīt do it)

About the x minutes for the "closed window" notify, I said, because the reasons you have already told, that even that way it wouldn`t be 100% accurate, but I think that at least it would stop the "closed windows" notify to appear once and again after many minutes from de last message... It is a improvement, no a solution ^_^ (great idea to make the user choose the time, I hadnīt thought about it!)

About the patches that delete the "user is writing a message" message, I hadnīt thought about that neither... But as I said, it was a way to make it more accurate, not a solution :P


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by Brodiebaby2020 on 07-05-2006 at 11:14 AM

I downloaded this.. and it keeps telling me people are opening convos with me but they are offline :S


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by rob_botch on 07-05-2006 at 11:21 AM

At the risk of sounding stupid, what is actually the point of knowing when a contact opens a window anyway? If they are going to talk, you'll see the message. Surely you can wait the few seconds between opening a window and typing a message?

I may have missed something, but I really don't see the point.


RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by Mushroom_Man on 07-05-2006 at 12:31 PM

Personally, I'm more curious about when someone closes the window. As I remember, that also happened to be (a bit) more reliable.


RE: RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by Brodiebaby2020 on 07-05-2006 at 04:23 PM

quote:
Originally posted by rob_botch
At the risk of sounding stupid, what is actually the point of knowing when a contact opens a window anyway? If they are going to talk, you'll see the message. Surely you can wait the few seconds between opening a window and typing a message?

I may have missed something, but I really don't see the point.

I sometimes like to change my status if someone i can't be  bothered with opens a convo with me.. lolol. :]
RE: RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by MisterFreak on 07-05-2006 at 07:20 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Mushroom_Man
Personally, I'm more curious about when someone closes the window. As I remember, that also happened to be (a bit) more reliable.


Well..that isn't my experience..it kept telling me that someone closed their window...almost after every message they send..and they didn't close it..i asked it many times.
RE: [Request]What Stuffplug will not have anymore... by tbcat on 07-05-2006 at 07:56 PM

I found it useful to know when someone closed the windows (with a bit of practice it was easy to know when was real and when was a false alarm with as much as 90% of accurancy (in my case))

To know when a user opened a windows was useful to know just for fun, to take my contacts by surprise XD (although it was a bit less accurate because of obvious reasons :S)