Colouring [code][/code] - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +---- Forum: Forum & Website (/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +----- Thread: Colouring [code][/code] (/showthread.php?tid=62935) Colouring [code][/code] by matty on 07-09-2006 at 09:54 PM
I personally would really like to see this. It is getting quite old seeing the forums filled with code that isn't coloured(Canadian way of spelling it) unless the poster does it themselves. RE: Colouring [code][/code] by foaly on 07-09-2006 at 09:56 PM good idea... RE: Colouring [code][/code] by alexp2_ad on 07-09-2006 at 09:57 PM Yup, I use a slightly modded Geshi for mpwiki.net and it works great, if you could implement code tags with it, that'd be awesome. RE: Colouring [code][/code] by ShawnZ on 07-09-2006 at 10:03 PM
quote: its not the canadian way of spelling it quote: Paril's highlighting script does this (or will) RE: Colouring [code][/code] by matty on 07-09-2006 at 10:06 PM
quote:Well colour isn't the american way of spelling it. Americans spell it color. Canadians spell it colour. If you want to be technical its the British way of spelling it I think. quote:I haven't been able to find any info on this one. Is it still in development? RE: Colouring [code][/code] by ShawnZ on 07-09-2006 at 10:08 PM indeed (at both quotes) RE: Colouring [code][/code] by WDZ on 07-09-2006 at 10:16 PM
I already know about GeSHi... it's been suggested before. RE: Colouring [code][/code] by Lou on 07-10-2006 at 02:09 AM
Obviously it would be quite useless to integrate it now, when 1.2 is not so far around the corner now. How many types of codes does Geshi have? (like what languages) RE: Colouring [code][/code] by matty on 07-10-2006 at 03:19 AM
quote:ActionScript ActionScript (French Doc Links) Ada Apache Log File AppleScript ASM (NASM based) ASP AutoIT Bash BlitzBasic C C for Macs CAD DCL CAD Lisp CFDG C++ C# CSS D Delphi Diff DIV DOS Eiffel Fortran FreeBasic GML Groovy HTML (4.0.1) Inno Java Java 5 Javascript Lisp Lua Matlab MPASM MySQL NullSoft Installer Objective C OCaml OCaml (Brief) Openoffice.org BASIC Oracle 8 Pascal Perl PHP PHP (Brief version) Python QBasic/QuickBASIC Windows Registry robots.txt Ruby SAS Scheme SDLBasic Smalltalk Smarty SQL TCL Plain text T-SQL VisualBasic VB.NET VHDL VisualFoxPro Winbatch XML Some of those I have never heard of. RE: Colouring [code][/code] by surfichris on 07-10-2006 at 04:14 AM
Geshi is slow and bloated for what is needed here. RE: Colouring [code][/code] by -dt- on 07-10-2006 at 06:59 AM
The problem I see in it is that not everyone will use it they will just keep using the normal [code] tags and theres no real way to "guess" what type of code it is. RE: Colouring [code][/code] by Hank on 07-10-2006 at 07:16 AM isnt there some issue with greasemonkey though? RE: Colouring [code][/code] by -dt- on 07-10-2006 at 07:27 AM
quote:no not that I know of RE: Colouring [code][/code] by Hank on 07-10-2006 at 08:40 AM
i thought i read somewhere on these forums greasemonkey was buggy,, .. im doubley doo sure i saw it posted. .someone having issues with FF RE: Colouring [code][/code] by andrewdodd13 on 07-10-2006 at 09:47 AM
I think the problem with Greasemonkey was people used to think it's a security issue before realising it's quite hard to install a GM script. And as for "color" / "colour" - "color" is the way it was spelled when the Americans moved there, since then the English language has been bastardised by the Frenchn, so we have some dodgy spellings. Think "centre" (French) as opposed to "center" (how it sounds in English). |