Shoutbox

Burners for Vista - Printable Version

-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Tech Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+----- Thread: Burners for Vista (/showthread.php?tid=66244)

Burners for Vista by DarkMe on 09-14-2006 at 08:37 PM

I've been using Vista recently but i haven't found any burner for it.
Does anyone know about anyone?
I've tried Nero 6 but doesn't works, and the 7 i dunno if it works with Vista

thanks in advance


RE: Burners for Vista by user27089 on 09-14-2006 at 08:52 PM

You should try out Nero Premium 7, it will probably work with Vista.


RE: Burners for Vista by DarkMe on 09-14-2006 at 08:59 PM

ok
* DarkMe downloads
Compatible Systems
Win95, Win98, WinNT, Win2000, WinME, WinXP
:sad:


RE: Burners for Vista by wj on 09-14-2006 at 09:36 PM

http://www.apcstart.com/site/tgaden/2006/09/1455/...sta-claims-alcohol


RE: Burners for Vista by ShawnZ on 09-14-2006 at 09:38 PM

quote:
Originally posted by wj
http://www.apcstart.com/site/tgaden/2006/09/1455/microsoft-deliberately-blocking-disc-burning-software-in-vista-claims-alcohol
false 8-)


use imgburn.
RE: Burners for Vista by DarkMe on 09-14-2006 at 09:41 PM

yay, thanks a lot
And how i make an image cd(Iso file of madrakelinux :p )?


RE: Burners for Vista by wj on 09-14-2006 at 10:00 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ShawnZ
imgburn


imgburn must work in a different way than the majority of burning software.
RE: Burners for Vista by ShawnZ on 09-14-2006 at 11:19 PM

quote:
Originally posted by wj
imgburn must work in a different way than the majority of burning software.

no, the majority of burning software is written by whining bitches that can't figure out how to make their software compatible with vista.
RE: Burners for Vista by wj on 09-14-2006 at 11:24 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ShawnZ
quote:
Originally posted by wj
imgburn must work in a different way than the majority of burning software.

no, the majority of burning software is written by whining bitches that can't figure out how to make their software compatible with vista.

Calm down.

It's just burning software.


Now, Why bother making their software compatible with a product that is still in development and likly to still change before release? It's just irresponsibile as a company to do that, You will waste lots of money developing patches, fixes, and work arrounds to make your software work on Vista which is still in it's development cycle.
RE: Burners for Vista by ShawnZ on 09-14-2006 at 11:31 PM

quote:
Originally posted by wj
Now, Why bother making their software compatible with a product that is still in development and likly to still change before release?

because they didn't. it already was compatible.

likely*

quote:
Originally posted by wj
It's just irresponsibile as a company to do that, You will waste lots of money developing patches, fixes, and work arrounds to make your software work on Vista which is still in it's development cycle.

well that's weird isn't it, since imgburn is free and works better than any shareware or trialware burning crap on every platform i've tried it on...
RE: Burners for Vista by wj on 09-14-2006 at 11:42 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ShawnZ

well that's weird isn't it, since imgburn is free and works better than any shareware or trialware burning crap on every platform i've tried it on...

Well thats weird, isn't it, It's free? So they have no financial responsibility to there customers to ensure they have a solid working product? And they have no worries about wasting money on development? My gosh, I guess the whole open source and free software world is just a whole different ball game.

quote:
Originally posted by ShawnZ
because they didn't. it already was compatible.

likely*

I'm guessing your making that in reference to imgburn. They probably use a different method of burning then most commercial applications. Either way, that was not the point of the article, If you had even bothered to read the whole article you'd see it specifically mentions Imgburn as a working alternative.