code:

---

v29466FJ4LJmQ4h5L6gKji9LA4K296iKMKaml362954kGlEmH4d466pha

---

code:

---

6qLRJSTRwScSkSTSYSUSBP2R4SWPMswseR3sfrIpMris8s7sBsprjs3p2

---

code:

---

Dencryptor is quite complex!

---

looks awsome, i might try it

Ok, I've updated the script to version 1.20. This version allows you to customize the amount of supported characters in the encryption (using /complex and /size) at the cost of the encryption's length. The new complex character set is more than 5 times the size of the original character set, and if set to the correct settings, the encryption can support Asian characters as well.

There is also a save feature so that you don't need to retype your settings every time you log in.

See the first post for details. Any feedback would be ! Thanks!

That's a very cool script, very nice work .

How about a GUI?

Very cool script!
But what about an auto-decrypter set per contact? So, if you recieve an encoded message from a contact which you have on some list, it'll automatically decrypt the message using the presetted key. That way, you don't even have to decrypt it yourself and the others would hav no clue what you're talking about.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mattike
Very cool script!
But what about an auto-decrypter set per contact? So, if you recieve an encoded message from a contact which you have on some list, it'll automatically decrypt the message using the presetted key. That way, you don't even have to decrypt it yourself and the others would hav no clue what you're talking about.

---

The text it is replace with, shouldn't be longer than the original text...
(Not the case here, I think)
Just use:
function OnEvent_ChatWndReceiveMessage(ChatWnd, Origin, Message, MessageKind) {
   var OtherMessage = "abc"
   return OtherMessage
}

If it doesn't work, try posting the code here...

-edit- and some minor suggestion, try to keep you scriptcommands together using a small prefix, something like denKey and denAutoEncrypt
It'll show up in a group in the ScriptCommands window

If the source is openly editable by the user, it can be easily cracked can't it? Meaning that the whole thing would be useless? I'm liking the idea anyway and might give it a try for a bit

I never saved my original AutoDecrypt function because it never worked, but I recreated this one, which should be the same. (Note: This is for the normal encryption, without ASCII characters.)

code:

---

function OnEvent_ChatWndReceiveMessage(ChatWnd, Origin, Message, MessageKind) {
   if(AutoDecrypt && /^[0-9a-z]+$/i.test(Message)) {
      var Decryption = Decrypt(Message, Key);
      if(Origin == Messenger.MyName) {
         Debug.Trace(" Encrypted message sent by current user.\n  Decrypted: " + Decryption);
         return Decryption;
      }
      else {
         Debug.Trace(" Encrypted message sent by contact.\n  Decrypted: " + Decryption);
         return Decryption;
      }
   }
}

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by SpunkyLoveMuff
If the source is openly editable by the user, it can be easily cracked can't it? Meaning that the whole thing would be useless? I'm liking the idea anyway and might give it a try for a bit

---

Unless you made a script to read the registry key or text file and got it to send back to you, or upload to a server

Rofl, personally, even if I knew how to, I wouldn't be bothered doing something like that just to read someone's encrypted 10 letter message.

LMAO just pointing it out Doubt anyone would ever want to do it

The changing on receive works for me...
altough you use 'Auto' in your code, and 'AutoDecrypt' in the Receive function...

And a bug: commands get encrypted too, not your own commands, but when you try to change you status using '/away' the encrypted form gets send

I don't know how the key stuff works (yet) but you have a global key (per user) and you need that key to encode and decrypt the message, so the other user has to have the same global key, right? (not sure) than he sends an encrypted message to another contact, witht that same key, because it's used for encrypting and decrypting, wouldn't that mean that all the contacts need to have the same key?
I think you need to have a per user Key...

Yes, that's how it works, with a per user key. The way it works is that you and your contact will be talking using the same key. The problem is, your contact will somehow need to find out what key you are using in order to talk to you, which makes it kind of pointless. I may decide to make the key used for AutoEncrypt and AutoDecrypt related to the contacts' user ID's, so that you won't need to find out (that actually sounds like quite a good idea ). If you have other ideas, suggest away!

As for the AutoDecrypt, I'll have to see if it is because it is being interfered with another script.
EDIT: Found the problem. It was being interfered by Choli's Linked Chats script.

In the next release, I'll fix the command bug as well. (You can edit the script yourself if you want. )

PS. Question: If I use multiple messengers (polygamy), do the global variables overlap? Also, anyone know how to make a list of contacts with checkboxes?

EDIT: Updated first post with bug fixes and AutoDecrypt. Now I'll probably get to work on fixing up the whole key thing.

the encrypted strings are a lot longer than the original ones, maybe you can make it so that if the encrypted string is too long it will be sent in parts so you don't have to bother about the length of the message?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jesus
the encrypted strings are a lot longer than the original ones, maybe you can make it so that if the encrypted string is too long it will be sent in parts so you don't have to bother about the length of the message?

---

* Matti looks at phalanxii...

quote:

---

Originally posted by phalanxii
Yes, that's how it works, with a per user key. The way it works is that you and your contact will be talking using the same key. The problem is, your contact will somehow need to find out what key you are using in order to talk to you, which makes it kind of pointless. I may decide to make the key used for AutoEncrypt and AutoDecrypt related to the contacts' user ID's, so that you won't need to find out (that actually sounds like quite a good idea ).

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by phalanxii
PS. Question: If I use multiple messengers (polygamy), do the global variables overlap?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by phalanxii
Also, anyone know how to make a list of contacts with checkboxes?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mattike

quote:

---

Originally posted by Jesus
the encrypted strings are a lot longer than the original ones, maybe you can make it so that if the encrypted string is too long it will be sent in parts so you don't have to bother about the length of the message?

---

Good idea, I think the encrypt function can pre-calculate the length of the encryption, so it can split and encrypt the separate strings.
* Mattike looks at phalanxii...

---

This is quite a major update (v1.50). The first post has most of the details. (THERE'S A NIFTY CONFIGURATION WINDOW!! )

However, I thought I might just clarify the use of AutoKey. To use AutoKey, you need to select the contacts that you wish to encrypt with. From there, it will generate a key based on you and your selected contacts. This key will be the same for each one of your contacts who select the same people. The point of this was to make it more convenient for people so that they do not always have to exchange keys.

The problem with this is, as Cookie has said, the AutoKey's key is crackable. Therefore, the use of AutoKey should be used with care, but for more security, do not use AutoKey, but instead use a custom one.