server specs - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Tech Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +----- Thread: server specs (/showthread.php?tid=68789) server specs by Supersonicdarky on 11-24-2006 at 01:58 AM
i was thinking of getting a pc to act as a server (for lan (data storage) and to host a site). What would the recommended specs be? I was browsing though monitor and found a cheap refurbished pc. (1 ghz p3, 256ram, 20gb, win2k for $99 cad) Is this ok (other than hd) or i need better? RE: server specs by DarkMe on 11-24-2006 at 02:01 AM
I think Windows Server 2003 RE: server specs by Supersonicdarky on 11-24-2006 at 02:03 AM as i said, "other than hd". I'd get an external 200gig drive... RE: server specs by lizard.boy on 11-24-2006 at 02:20 AM External for a file server? I suggest you think again, although I've been wrong before. Personally for a web server I'd be using Linux, no question about it (I have experience with Gentoo & Ubuntu). For a file server you can still use Linux to get an ultra stable server (and virus free too) by using samba, but in my experiences samba can be a little bit tricky. I'd still put samba ahead of windows because windows costs money, requires an anti virus which costs money, and wont be as stable in terms of uptime. RE: server specs by Supersonicdarky on 11-24-2006 at 02:33 AM i only wanted external because i'd keep my music on it, and if i ever take my laptop somewhere, i'd like my music with me. But it doesnt really matter since soon i'll get a zune and i can put all music there. And internal would also probably be cheaper. I'll think about linux. RE: server specs by Menthix on 11-24-2006 at 05:51 AM
Hardware is fine, you really don't need much for a LAN fileserver. I would add a nice PCI networkcard in it (if there isn't one already) if I could, they usually preform better than build-in ones. RE: server specs by rav0 on 11-24-2006 at 10:29 AM
I'd go for the 1.8 GHz one, but it is twice the cost. The extra processing power can be put to use doing stuff like file verification/(de)compression/video compression (but that will take ages on only 1.8 GHZ, though it won't bother you on the server). |