New PC Build - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Tech Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +----- Thread: New PC Build (/showthread.php?tid=73642) New PC Build by Ptoye on 04-16-2007 at 10:43 AM
Hey, RE: New PC Build by John Anderton on 04-16-2007 at 10:50 AM
quote:2x1GB gives you expandability because almost all motherboards atm have only 4 ram slots. So 2x1GB gives you an option in the future to get more ram. That's what you should go for quote:the 4200+ by AMD looked good. I was actually considering it until I got my hands on my E6600 about six months back quote:ATA? SATA wins any day quote:Or get a DVD-RW which has lightscribe capabilities like mine? I didn't even know what lightscribe was when I got this :x The only thing I don't have is blue-ray read/write capabilities but those aren't as common yet so yay Good luck with the new pc RE: New PC Build by Knucks on 04-16-2007 at 10:51 AM
quote:Buying a PSU that cheap is not at all recommended. Considering that the PSU is the component that powers the whole of your PC, I would definately up the wattage to say about ~600W (However, I don't know what you're using this PC for, but 600W would give you a good amount of power.) As for the price... you get what you pay for, £13 is not a lot at all so if you don't want your PC to fail due to the PSU, up the wager to something more "trustable" if you can, also go with a manufacturer that is well-known too. RE: New PC Build by Ptoye on 04-16-2007 at 11:01 AM
quote: well i wanted two so that i could use it well like two drives... quote: i can get a 650W for an extra £12 thanks both of you RE: New PC Build by ShawnZ on 04-16-2007 at 11:02 AM
quote: serial ata is ata too quote: get a core2 duo RE: New PC Build by Ptoye on 04-16-2007 at 11:04 AM
quote: sorry i ment serial ata quote: to costly RE: New PC Build by John Anderton on 04-16-2007 at 11:17 AM
quote:When did he say serial ata? Other than the post above this of course I've not seen any ATA disc above 80GB. Don't think they exist or are in use mainly Anyway, as Knuckles said, 600W PSU should be enough. That's what I have Got mine for 7 pounds though I never said UK was the cheapest place to buy things quote:Not everyone has a gold mine under their house like our (not so) little shawnzy quote:*too Its cheaper now than it was back then. Quite a lot cheaper RE: New PC Build by CookieRevised on 04-16-2007 at 11:25 AM
Same things what the others already said, and: quote:Buy a big enough case. Space is everything. It isn't a laptop so it shouldn't matter if the case is a bit bigger than otherwise. More space means better air circulation, means more lifetime. It also means you can more easly expand and put more cards in it if needed. I would look for a full sized case... quote:try to get a dual core2 quote:speed depends also on your motherboard, make sure both are compatible. Also go for two sticks if your motherboard supports dual channel memory. Don't get more than 3GB, more than 3GB is totally useless. quote:two HDDs of like 200GB are better than 1 of 400GB. Even when you partionate the one big HDD into 2, it will run slower than when you have two physical seperate HDDs. quote:see if it supports all formats. Starting with +RW, -RW, DVD-RAM, etc. But also DAO (most important if you are going to write discs), TAO, digital input, etc. Try to get a dual layer supporting drive. quote:By cooler do you mean a passive element or a fan? Best is to have both. Also, besides a CPU cooler you should invest in an extra fan for the case. Prefereable two (one to get air in, one to get air out) quote:most likely this is a crap PSU... 400W is enough, but the price isn't... Go for a higher price range. Never cut budget on the PSU! If you buy one and you can choose between a few, get the one that is the heaviest. This indicates in almost all cases a very decent quality. Look if there are plugs to put the power of your monitor in (very handy; though in that case get a PSU with a bit more wattage). Also see: http://shoutbox.menthix.net/showthread.php?tid=51...d=551342#pid551342 quote:That mostly depends on your graphics card, not your motherboard. Get a decent graphics card which supports dual view (not all do! some only support clone view), and one with two DVI connectors (not one with one VGA and one DVI). RE: New PC Build by Kenji on 04-16-2007 at 03:40 PM
quote:You will only get about 1GB 667 For that price.. quote:For the specs that you want and how much money you have, get a cheaper case that is around £50. quote:The stock cooling is good enough IMO. quote:Like other people have said, get around 600w. quote:Seeing as youre not going to be gaming, as you said in your previous post, get a nVidia 7300 GS. I used to have that and it ran dual screens fine. Well, i got bored so I went to overclockers.co.uk and set some up.. You would have to get a bigger budget for what you want.. AMD setup Core 2 Duo setup If i was you, i would save up some more and get the c2d setup.. You could save money by taking stuff out of your old PC, like DVD drives, etc. if possible. RE: New PC Build by user27089 on 04-16-2007 at 04:56 PM You should try and get a smaller monitor and you'll get the package cheaper, or of course get a better graphics card or something. The biggest screen anyone needs is 17", which is 1280x1024. Which is, in my opinion the best resolution for games etc. RE: New PC Build by Ptoye on 04-16-2007 at 05:32 PM
quote: thanks! think i will go for a 600W quote: quote: Never knew that some only suported clone view thanks, i will ask the guy at th local pc shop which one in the range to get. quote: Seeing as youre not going to be gaming, as you said in your previous post, get a nVidia 7300 GS. I used to have that and it ran dual screens fine. Yeh i think a dedicated grapics card would be a good idea .. thanks @ dazzy - Thanks for the AMD and intel setups! i think i like them, the two asus drives look very good, but i dont think i shoulhd be spending that much on a PSU.... quote: I agree although i have saved up enough (will save more though ) for dual screens (hopefully 20") so i may aswell use the money, i like the concept of dual screens too so thanks everyone A lot of help there, alot of info for me to take into condideration, one i get it build (eventually ) i will post a thread in GCC or T&T about it to let you see what i ended up getting.. thanks again! P.toye RE: New PC Build by CookieRevised on 04-16-2007 at 07:39 PM The money you can spare if you buy some smaller screen can be better used for other critical things like memory and/or cpu. Two 20" screens is seriously over the top if you ask me, especially if you need to cut down on other components. A screen is almost the least important and critical thing in the whole system. It is also something which you can easly expand later on. If you don't have enough money, cut down on the screens, you can later always buy a bigger one. RE: New PC Build by Ptoye on 04-16-2007 at 07:59 PM
quote: I see what you mean..... possibly i could just get one moniter ATM and then put the money in CPU/RAM.Grapics card... good thinking thanks RE: New PC Build by Jhrono on 04-17-2007 at 12:00 AM
Maybe you should do some research first.. That hardware is awfully outdated.. RE: RE: New PC Build by Verte on 04-19-2007 at 09:21 AM
quote:No way, especially with Vista. If you're using Vista on a 32 bit machine especially- with 4GB you can almost stop it thrashing and caching it's brains out Well, that said, I don't know what you will be using it for so there's a chance you will use less. Still, it's nice to have all your ram in physical ram rather than on your disk! RE: New PC Build by CookieRevised on 05-03-2007 at 12:03 PM
quote:yes way... If you're using a 32bit system, it is absolutely useless to add more than 3GB (well 3,5 something actually) performance wise. The added memory will not add anything in performance, speed, memory usage, etc. It will simply be wasted and not being used. Even if you have 2 processes using each 2GB of memory, Windows will still need to use a pagefile (even in Vista!). There are hundreds of benchmarks to back this up too And all this for normal PC usage (thus not talking about server editions of Windows, etc. RE: New PC Build by Jhrono on 05-03-2007 at 01:45 PM
By the way, you shouldn't buy a PC just now. Wait for the new few months, Q6600 is coming to replace E6600 (Quad CPU), new motherboards with the P35 Intel Chipset (Supporting DDR3), ATi Dx10 cards (Supposedly) coming out soon, Nvidia 8800 Ultra coming out too.. RE: RE: New PC Build by Verte on 05-03-2007 at 03:28 PM
quote: Then you can turn all pagefiles off I know, it's still kind of overkill. I've just had too many experiences [mostly mathematical models and simulations, your mileage may vary elsewhere] with Windows paging with nearly a gig of free ram, sucking my performance down. Moving from a recent Windows machine to a six year old laptop running Unix cuts the simulation time by a factor of about five. I haven't had the time to check Windows with paging turned off, I only heard it could be done without deep magic in #Python the other day, but I imagine the speedup could be similar in programs that access a lot of ram at a time. BTW Cookie, you sure these benchmarks are for 32 bit? |