Shoutbox

New Website - Printable Version

-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+---- Forum: General Chit Chat (/forumdisplay.php?fid=14)
+----- Thread: New Website (/showthread.php?tid=75216)

New Website by Exca on 06-09-2007 at 08:37 PM

www.ambisquad.com

What you guys think of it :D
(It's not me who made it, it's my friend I dj with, he studied IT..)


RE: New Website by Chris4 on 06-09-2007 at 08:42 PM

Wow.. very professional. Superb.


RE: New Website by WDZ on 06-09-2007 at 08:54 PM

Requires Flash? No link to an alternate version, or a "skip intro" link?

* WDZ closes window. :p


RE: New Website by saralk on 06-09-2007 at 09:07 PM

It's a nice look site, but autoplaying music really gets on my nerves.


RE: New Website by Chris4 on 06-09-2007 at 09:08 PM

quote:
Originally posted by saralk
It's a nice look site, but autoplaying music really gets on my nerves.
Same, I had to turn it off.
RE: New Website by Menthix on 06-09-2007 at 09:31 PM

quote:
Originally posted by WDZ
Requires Flash? No link to an alternate version, or a "skip intro" link?
The whole thing is 100% flash :( Would score awesomeness points if it were (D)HTML / Javascript.

And also, the looks are great, but please don't disturb my winamp pleasure by auto-playing music on any site.
RE: New Website by Plik on 06-09-2007 at 10:23 PM

ARGH why does the logo flash? i thought i was going mad for a while :(

Other than that and the auto playing music the sites pretty cool (y)


RE: New Website by albert on 06-09-2007 at 10:33 PM

Looks is fantastic, yet the text font is too basic.


RE: New Website by M73A on 06-09-2007 at 10:37 PM

well my first thought impression - "Nice fucking site!!!!"

(Y) :D


RE: New Website by Rolando on 06-10-2007 at 12:22 AM

very nice. I don't like how the logo flashes though..


RE: New Website by ShawnZ on 06-10-2007 at 12:40 AM

could have been done easily without flash


RE: New Website by Exca on 06-10-2007 at 07:34 AM

Code freaks ^^ I still think it's about the content... flash codes much faster then javascript for the same purpose :D so why would he have done it that way..

I don't know why you should skip the intro though... clicking 'skip' should take as long as the introfades :P


RE: New Website by Nathan on 06-10-2007 at 08:40 AM

Not everyone has flash though.


RE: New Website by Exca on 06-10-2007 at 08:42 AM

those ppl are behind any form of evolution :p


RE: New Website by Nathan on 06-10-2007 at 08:45 AM

Not really, schools sometimes turn it off to keep their pc's fast.


RE: New Website by vaccination on 06-10-2007 at 08:46 AM

Okay, so, why does the "AmbiSquad" header thingo keep flashing every  3 seconds or so?


RE: New Website by Nathan on 06-10-2007 at 08:49 AM

To get your attention to their name.


RE: New Website by vaccination on 06-10-2007 at 08:52 AM

Fair enough, but it's horrible.

Either make it fade in and out smoothly, or put a slight glowing effect on it.


RE: New Website by markee on 06-10-2007 at 09:07 AM

Flash might be faster to code but javascript loads HEAPS quicker.  But I like to include javascript in everything, it saves learning anything else.

Oh and apart from the auto-playing music and the flashing logo it looked really good.


RE: New Website by surfichris on 06-10-2007 at 10:01 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Exca
Code freaks ^^ I still think it's about the content... flash codes much faster then javascript for the same purpose :D so why would he have done it that way..
Oh dear.

I could list 10,000 reasons why it should have been done in HTML/JS


--

Why is your designers site using the same layout?

http://xeeder.ambisquad.com/

Seems dodgy - and it is one whole image.
RE: New Website by Lourix on 06-10-2007 at 10:09 AM

Good site anyway but thank god you can turn the music off :P Also I like how you don't have to scroll down its just all in front of you.


RE: New Website by absorbation on 06-10-2007 at 10:15 AM

The only thing that made me close my browser straight away was the loud music :P


RE: New Website by vaccination on 06-10-2007 at 10:34 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton

Why is your designers site using the same layout?

http://xeeder.ambisquad.com/

Seems dodgy - and it is one whole image.
Indeed, seems like he made one design and is ripping it off as many.
RE: RE: New Website by Exca on 06-10-2007 at 11:13 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton
quote:
Originally posted by Exca
Code freaks ^^ I still think it's about the content... flash codes much faster then javascript for the same purpose :D so why would he have done it that way..
Oh dear.

I could list 10,000 reasons why it should have been done in HTML/JS


--

Why is your designers site using the same layout?

http://xeeder.ambisquad.com/

Seems dodgy - and it is one whole image.


It's not mine it's my friend's :D and he's quite busy so he didn't sliced it yet.
RE: RE: New Website by Xeeder on 06-10-2007 at 11:22 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton
quote:
Originally posted by Exca
Code freaks ^^ I still think it's about the content... flash codes much faster then javascript for the same purpose :D so why would he have done it that way..
Oh dear.

I could list 10,000 reasons why it should have been done in HTML/JS


--

Why is your designers site using the same layout?

http://xeeder.ambisquad.com/

Seems dodgy - and it is one whole image.


Ok, I'm the designer ;)

About those 10,000 reasons, why don't you list a few?

The other site (http://xeeder.ambisquad.com) still has to be sliced idd, and it'll probably be in XHTML/CSS. But I'm really busy now so I didn't had the time yet.

quote:
Originally posted by vaccination
quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton

Why is your designers site using the same layout?

http://xeeder.ambisquad.com/

Seems dodgy - and it is one whole image.
Indeed, seems like he made one design and is ripping it off as many.

Sorry ;) but there's a clear difference between all my designs. I just like some unity in all of my creations. That's why the background and container are alike on all of my designs.
RE: New Website by Matti on 06-10-2007 at 12:10 PM

Nice Flash site, however I'm not a Flash-fan. I prefer the beautiful HTML+CSS coding. :)

But nicely done! (y)


RE: New Website by surfichris on 06-10-2007 at 12:12 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
About those 10,000 reasons, why don't you list a few?
  • Search engine optimisation
  • Usability
  • Accessibility (legally, your site must be accessible by those with disabilities)
  • Screen readers cannot read Flash content
  • Mobile/portable browser access
  • Flash files are larger
  • You require people have flash installed to view anything on the site
  • There's no reason for it to be flash - the layout isn't "interactive" - it is static content
  • I can't use [Page down] to scroll through the content on the pages. Why should I need to use my mouse to view a web page?

I could go on.
RE: New Website by vaccination on 06-10-2007 at 12:23 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
Sorry ;) but there's a clear difference between all my designs. I just like some unity in all of my creations. That's why the background and container are alike on all of my designs.
Fair enough, just wondered.
RE: RE: New Website by Xeeder on 06-10-2007 at 01:28 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton
  • Search engine optimisation
  • Usability
  • Accessibility (legally, your site must be accessible by those with disabilities)
  • Screen readers cannot read Flash content
  • Mobile/portable browser access
  • Flash files are larger
  • You require people have flash installed to view anything on the site
  • There's no reason for it to be flash - the layout isn't "interactive" - it is static content
  • I can't use [Page down] to scroll through the content on the pages. Why should I need to use my mouse to view a web page?



my feedback on your reasons in order:
  • Your right about that, but for this site the title, meta description and meta keywords are enough ;)
  • 99% of our visitors have flash installed and the site isn't difficult to use.
  • With all due respect for those with disabilities but we can't do good for everyone! We have to keep in mind that the people we are trying to reach love animation and flash websites.
  • Same answer as the above question
  • My mobile views the website perfectly ;) and I'm working on a RSS feed that can be used by mobile/portable users.
  • The total size of the swf file is 288KB, that takes about 0,5 seconds to load for people with a broadband connection and about 4,8 seconds for people with a smallband connection. Sorry but people who can't wait that long just aren't worth it to visit the site. Anyway if I had done it without flash it would certainly have been more than 288KB and it would be much slower because the visitor would have to load multiple files.
  • 99% of our visitors have flash installed and 100% of the people we purpose to reach with this website have flash installed.
  • There are fading effects wich cannot be done as fluently with any other technology than flash, i don't like seeing anoying page refreshes everytime I click a menu-item, it's better to stream music, ... the content is not static, there's a shoutbox, every tekst you see on the website comes out of a mysql database.
  • Why do some people use a electric lawn mower and some a lawn mower driven by oil? It does the same thing so what does it mather? And if you don't like to use your mouse, why do you have one?

The way a website is maid depends on the people you make it for. The people we make it for just have flash installed, have a mouse they like to use, don't like the ugly standard scrollbars and just love to hear some music (Y).
RE: New Website by Nathan on 06-10-2007 at 01:34 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
my feedback on your reasons in order:
  • Your right about that, but for this site the title, meta description and meta keywords are enough ;)
  • 99% of our visitors have flash installed and the site isn't difficult to use.
  • With all due respect for those with disabilities but we can't do good for everyone! We have to keep in mind that the people we are trying to reach love animation and flash websites.
  • Same answer as the above question
  • My mobile views the website perfectly ;) and I'm working on a RSS feed that can be used by mobile/portable users.
  • The total size of the swf file is 288KB, that takes about 0,5 seconds to load for people with a broadband connection and about 4,8 seconds for people with a smallband connection. Sorry but people who can't wait that long just aren't worth it to visit the site. Anyway if I had done it without flash it would certainly have been more than 288KB and it would be much slower because the visitor would have to load multiple files.
  • 99% of our visitors have flash installed and 100% of the people we purpose to reach with this website have flash installed.
  • There are fading effects wich cannot be done as fluently with any other technology than flash, i don't like seeing anoying page refreshes everytime I click a menu-item, it's better to stream music, ... the content is not static, there's a shoutbox, every tekst you see on the website comes out of a mysql database.
  • Why do some people use a electric lawn mower and some a lawn mower driven by oil? It does the same thing so what does it mather? And if you don't like to use your mouse, why do you have one?

The way a website is maid depends on the people you make it for. The people we make it for just have flash installed, have a mouse they like to use, don't like the ugly standard scrollbars and just love to hear some music (Y).
1.) No, the meta tags are not enough, what about the site content?
2.) 99%, there are still 1% without it.
3.) Just because someones disabled, doesnt mean they should be left out
4.) Same as above
5.) Yeah, but not all mobiles have flash for example.
6.) most could code that up so it's less than 288kb :/
7.) Not really, not all people who want dj's will have flash.
8.) Fading effects can be done very fluently with javascript.
9.) Becuase you cant use windows to the full extent without one, and people want to read and not concentrate on their mouse moving the scrollbar
RE: New Website by surfichris on 06-10-2007 at 01:39 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
Your right about that, but for this site the title, meta description and meta keywords are enough
Meta keywords and description are NOT!!! important and as highly ranked these days as ACTUAL CONTENT.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
With all due respect for those with disabilities but we can't do good for everyone! We have to keep in mind that the people we are trying to reach love animation and flash websites.
OK, so when you get sued - don't come back crawly. You CAN do good for everyone. It is very easy.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
My mobile views the website perfectly
Your mobile has flash? Then I'd assume it was Opera Mobile/Opera or you have a PDA/PocketPC phone which has Flash - you should know then it is not a newer version.

Many portable phones and such will not show the phone.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
The total size of the swf file is 288KB, that takes about 0,5 seconds to load for people with a broadband connection and about 4,8 seconds for people with a smallband connection. Sorry but people who can't wait that long just aren't worth it to visit the site. Anyway if I had done it without flash it would certainly have been more than 288KB and it would be much slower because the visitor would have to load multiple files.
Actually - no, it would be smaller.

Yep, good business philosophy too. People who can't wait long enough aren't worth being a potential/return customer. 8-)
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
99% of our visitors have flash installed and 100% of the people we purpose to reach with this website have flash installed.
I highly doubt that. Do you have the statistics to prove it?
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
There are fading effects wich cannot be done as fluently with any other technology than flash, i don't like seeing anoying page refreshes everytime I click a menu-item, it's better to stream music, ... the content is not static, there's a shoutbox, every tekst you see on the website comes out of a mysql database.
DHTML and javascript. http://script.aculo.us/http://script.aculo.us/
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
    * Why do some people use a electric lawn mower and some a lawn mower driven by oil? It does the same thing so what does it mather? And if you don't like to use your mouse, why do you have one?

Wow. That is the most stupid comparison I've heard in a while.

Can a blind person use a lawn mower? No - they get someone else to do it for them - in terms of the website, a screen reader.

You really, really, really need to go back and learn how to design, develop and produce websites properly.

Before you start on my knowledge and question me - I'd like to explain a little in what I do for a living. I'm a web developer, designer and web standards advocate. I run my own successful business, develop a fairly popular web application, have developed teaching materials on web standards & web design currently used by Australian educational institutions. I provide web design advice and consultation services to several large Australian companies - and a few international. In the close future I'll also hopefully be moving in to the field of teaching the above and possibly running courses on web standards based web development and design practices.
RE: New Website by vaccination on 06-10-2007 at 01:40 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Napbree
and people want to read and not concentrate on their mouse moving the scrollbar
scroll wheel \o/
If you can't scroll and read using a mouse then wtf :P

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder

  • Why do some people use a electric lawn mower and some a lawn mower driven by oil? It does the same thing so what does it mather? And if you don't like to use your mouse, why do you have one?

Money. - Also, you cannot fully operate a computer without a mouse, that's why.
RE: New Website by Exca on 06-10-2007 at 02:09 PM

@Chris: you need to chill out dude, we already know you're the best :s

What about the sueing thing? That's the most stupid thing i've ever heard. Federal websites, medical website's or other instancy's should be indeed accessable by disabled people, because these websites are primary and civilians have the right to have an excellent care from every instance he PAYS for (insurance, state (paid by taxes), public libraries).
A website for a dj duo NOT... you're not obligated to visit it and sorry for people who can't, hell, we are not obligated to even HAVE a website, so how stupid is that. The website is for a promotional purpose and it extends all other promotional ways. And really, no one obligates us to make a design by rules, they don't even exist.
Oh wait: I'm going to sue you Chris because i'm curious of your home, but i'm a wheelchair patiënt and I can't access it because of the fuckin' stairs...

www.microsoft.com/surface => omg flash, let's all sue them!!!

If you think Xeeder would need to go back and relearn coding; you must be blind. He didn't graduate for nothing, in fact, he's just the same as you and many companies are willing to hire him because of the great work he deliveres.

So stop whining about rediculous things


RE: New Website by surfichris on 06-10-2007 at 02:23 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Exca
@Chris: you need to chill out dude, we already know you're the best
I'm not the best. Far from it.
quote:
Originally posted by Exca
What about the sueing thing? That's the most stupid thing i've ever heard.
It's discrimination.

Don't think it has happened?
Target Sued for Refusing to Make Website Accessible, Sydney Olympics Accessibility Complaint, Hotels.com Sued Over Disabled Access, Southwest & American Airlines Sued.
quote:
Originally posted by Exca
www.microsoft.com/surface => omg flash, let's all sue them!!!
The Microsoft Surface site is a product demonstration site which requires that level of animation/audio/video provided by Flash which cannot be delivered in another format.
quote:
Originally posted by Exca
If you think Xeeder would need to go back and relearn coding; you must be blind. He didn't graduate for nothing, in fact, he's just the same as you and many companies are willing to hire him because of the great work he deliveres.

He doesn't need to go back and re-learn. He just needs to be educated about this stuff and the teacher who taught him needs to go back and re-learn.

Also - you don't need to be smart to graduate. You just need to pass. I'm not saying his dumb - but just because he has graduated from something doesn't mean he is good. I know people who haven't attended any kind of tertiary education facilities who are more successful than myself and can deliver work of a higher quality.

As for people hiring him - I doubt that is via his portfolio site.
RE: New Website by stoshrocket on 06-10-2007 at 02:29 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder

The total size of the swf file is 288KB, that takes about 0,5 seconds to load for people with a broadband connection and about 4,8 seconds for people with a smallband connection. Sorry but people who can't wait that long just aren't worth it to visit the site. Anyway if I had done it without flash it would certainly have been more than 288KB and it would be much slower because the visitor would have to load multiple files.


Also, that's assuming all or most of the internet connection is dedicated to loading this site,- I'm on 2mb broadband and typically (along with many internet users) run WLM, a torrent engine/p2p client and many tabs in firefox while browsing, I know of few people who do one task at a time. When I loaded your website it took around 8 seconds to load, not a long time, but considering many people have an attention span that is minimal, it can be crucial. I think the statistic was something like 3 seconds to load or the average surfer will loose interest (that is when someone is used to instant loading with broadband). Using JS would greatly reduce it's loading time and make it near instant, I know I could code it under 288kb. ;)

BTW: I'm not having a go or critisising at all, the site itself I love, it's a great design, I'm just stating a fact is all, no insulting or any comment of the such meant by it :happy:
RE: RE: New Website by Xeeder on 06-10-2007 at 03:00 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton
quote:
Originally posted by Exca
What about the sueing thing? That's the most stupid thing i've ever heard.
It's discrimination.

Don't think it has happened?
Target Sued for Refusing to Make Website Accessible, Sydney Olympics Accessibility Complaint.
quote:
Originally posted by Exca
www.microsoft.com/surface => omg flash, let's all sue them!!!

That's ridiculous, i know Americans are great in sueing other Americans for the most stupid things (see http://www.jodysgarage.com/lawsuits.htm) but that's just childish and not the way it's done here in Belgium. Like Exca said, we are not obligated to even HAVE a website!

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton
The Microsoft Surface site is a product demonstration site which requires that level of animation/audio/video provided by flash.

The AmbiSquad website is a DJ Squad site wich requires that level of animation/audio/(and soon) video provided by flash.

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton
quote:
Originally posted by Exca
If you think Xeeder would need to go back and relearn coding; you must be blind. He didn't graduate for nothing, in fact, he's just the same as you and many companies are willing to hire him because of the great work he deliveres.

He doesn't need to go back and re-learn. He just needs to be educated about this stuff and the teacher who taught him needs to go back and re-learn.

My personal opinion is that you could use some education in designing too, your MyBB logo for example or the colorpicking on your blog I would rather describe as 'not looking professional'. In coding you might be good (and you don't mind to mention that, as others here) but thats not all you know.

I happen to work as a web-developer for various projects (big and little one's) also used by people all over the world too so 'before you start on my knowledge and question me...' no i'm not that kind of a person... :rolleyes:

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton
Also - you don't need to be smart to graduate. You just need to pass. I'm not saying his dumb - but just because he has graduated from something doesn't mean he is good. I know people who haven't attended any kind of tertiary education facilities who are more successful than myself and can deliver work of a higher quality.

That's maybe because there's a problem with the system of educating in your country.

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton
As for people hiring him - I doubt that is via his portfolio site.

Where do you think the projects on the portfolio come from???
And no, people don't only hire me via my portfolio, I've had many other projects than just these ones.




RE: New Website by Lou on 06-10-2007 at 03:06 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
i don't like seeing anoying page refreshes everytime I click a menu-item,
You could very easily use ajax.
RE: RE: New Website by Xeeder on 06-10-2007 at 03:11 PM

quote:
Originally posted by .Lou
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
i don't like seeing anoying page refreshes everytime I click a menu-item,
You could very easily use ajax.

I know, i use ajax in alot of my other projects and I like it very much. But i had to be prepared for adding some animations (flash) in the future so I used flash for this one.
RE: New Website by Volv on 06-10-2007 at 03:24 PM

Sigh, stop whinging. There are plenty of flash-based sites out there and if they feel that flash suits them the most then let them use flash.

That being said the site looks great. I have my speakers off (other people in the house) so I can't comment on this properly, but considering that the site is based around music, I don't see why music can't be played in the background - there are plenty of flash sites with bg music and this is probably one of the only ones which has a good reason for it.


RE: New Website by markee on 06-10-2007 at 04:06 PM

Personally I agree with Chris on all of his issues that he brings to the fore.

The disabled might be a minority but that does not mean they are to be excluded further and by posting a web page on the internet you are making it for EVERYONE to view, they did not choose to be disabled so you could at least show a little compassion and make it viewable by all (even if it means a little bit longer to code).

288kb is a large file size for any website with as much text as yours.  If it were 28.8kb then it might have been a different story but I could write enough javascript to replicate a fully, almost seem less looking, animated webpage (much like one in flash, but with a whole lot more animation than yours) using only PHP and Javascript.  Furthermore I believe anyone who has been serious about webdesign for more than 9 months should be at the same caliber.

Colours and logos are only a minor issue when it comes to webdesign as they are not what makes the website function, but are just the icing on the cake and can be changed easily if you decided to go in a different direction.  They should only paint on a house, it is the structure beneath that makes it a building.

There is nothing in that website that could not have been made through PHP/ASP and Javascript (with room for expansion) with an end result that is happy for any person and is compatible with search engines, online translators and the likes.

I did not mean to sound rude towards your work in any way, but want you to realise that there are other factors that you need to take into consideration when designing and coding webpages.


RE: RE: New Website by Xeeder on 06-10-2007 at 06:32 PM

quote:
Originally posted by markee
Personally I agree with Chris on all of his issues that he brings to the fore.

The disabled might be a minority but that does not mean they are to be excluded further and by posting a web page on the internet you are making it for EVERYONE to view, they did not choose to be disabled so you could at least show a little compassion and make it viewable by all (even if it means a little bit longer to code).

Sorry but than I do not understand why your sig should be less disabled-friendly because I don't know any screen-readers that can read text out of images. After all they did not choose to be disabled did they? Then again why do we use emoticons? Blind people can't see any emoticons can they? But still we use them!

quote:
Originally posted by markee
288kb is a large file size for any website with as much text as yours.  If it were 28.8kb then it might have been a different story but I could write enough javascript to replicate a fully, almost seem less looking, animated webpage (much like one in flash, but with a whole lot more animation than yours) using only PHP and Javascript.  Furthermore I believe anyone who has been serious about webdesign for more than 9 months should be at the same caliber.

Sorry but I still can't believe that, a website just like ours cannot be created just using code with less than 288kb of space needed.
If you would like to try, i'll be happy to send you the images,... you need.

quote:
Originally posted by markee
Colours and logos are only a minor issue when it comes to webdesign as they are not what makes the website function, but are just the icing on the cake and can be changed easily if you decided to go in a different direction.  They should only paint on a house, it is the structure beneath that makes it a building.

I have a different opinion about this, I think everything that has to do with colours, logo's, ... is as much as important than the code beneath. These are the factors that make a website nice to visit.

quote:
Originally posted by markee
There is nothing in that website that could not have been made through PHP/ASP and Javascript (with room for expansion) with an end result that is happy for any person and is compatible with search engines, online translators and the likes.

I'd like to see that! What about the music player (streaming mp3) ?

quote:
Originally posted by markee
I did not mean to sound rude towards your work in any way, but want you to realise that there are other factors that you need to take into consideration when designing and coding webpages.

I did not mean to sound rude also, it's just hard to defend/express myself because English is not my mother tongue.
RE: RE: RE: New Website by saralk on 06-10-2007 at 07:22 PM

Your site looks nice, there is no doubt about that, from a professional point of view, you shouldn't make a site with just flash, for all the afforementioned reasons.

Why don't you also make a text only version much like JK Rowling's website has?

However, from a business point of view, I don't see a major problem with using flash for this kind of site. If you make a text only version too (it doesn't have to be amazing, really basic will do) then it negates pretty much all the search engine/screen readers/disabled access complaints.

This site is meant to be a marketing site, not a majorly functional site like facebook, and so the same design rules do not apply to the sites. It's all about knowing your audience, the kind of people who visit this site will probably like the "cool" MySpace-esque animations and tacky design, so from a "designer completing a project to the client's specification" point of view, the site is good.

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
quote:
Originally posted by markee
Colours and logos are only a minor issue when it comes to webdesign as they are not what makes the website function, but are just the icing on the cake and can be changed easily if you decided to go in a different direction.  They should only paint on a house, it is the structure beneath that makes it a building.

I have a different opinion about this, I think everything that has to do with colours, logo's, ... is as much as important than the code beneath. These are the factors that make a website nice to visit.

I have to agree with Xeeder here, whilst it is important to have a well designed site that works fast, again it is all about audience.

Obviously making a site like facebook in flash, would be a bad move. But for site that isn't too interactive, and is more a promotional tool than a social site: flash is perfect.

The average fan of Xeeder, isn't really going to care that the site is made in flash, or javascript. All s/he is going to care about is that the site looks cool.
RE: RE: RE: RE: New Website by Xeeder on 06-10-2007 at 07:51 PM

quote:
Originally posted by saralk
Your site looks nice, there is no doubt about that, from a professional point of view, you shouldn't make a site with just flash, for all the afforementioned reasons.

Why don't you also make a text only version much like JK Rowling's website has?

However, from a business point of view, I don't see a major problem with using flash for this kind of site. If you make a text only version too (it doesn't have to be amazing, really basic will do) then it negates pretty much all the search engine/screen readers/disabled access complaints.

This site is meant to be a marketing site, not a majorly functional site like facebook, and so the same design rules do not apply to the sites. It's all about knowing your audience, the kind of people who visit this site will probably like the "cool" MySpace-esque animations and tacky design, so from a "designer completing a project to the client's specification" point of view, the site is good.

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
quote:
Originally posted by markee
Colours and logos are only a minor issue when it comes to webdesign as they are not what makes the website function, but are just the icing on the cake and can be changed easily if you decided to go in a different direction.  They should only paint on a house, it is the structure beneath that makes it a building.

I have a different opinion about this, I think everything that has to do with colours, logo's, ... is as much as important than the code beneath. These are the factors that make a website nice to visit.

I have to agree with Xeeder here, whilst it is important to have a well designed site that works fast, again it is all about audience.

Obviously making a site like facebook in flash, would be a bad move. But for site that isn't too interactive, and is more a promotional tool than a social site: flash is perfect.

The average fan of Xeeder, isn't really going to care that the site is made in flash, or javascript. All s/he is going to care about is that the site looks cool.

Thanks for the comment, maybe i'll create a text-only version one of these days. I'll do my best.
RE: New Website by surfichris on 06-11-2007 at 12:25 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
That's ridiculous, i know Americans are great in sueing other Americans for the most stupid things (see http://www.jodysgarage.com/lawsuits.htm) but that's just childish and not the way it's done here in Belgium. Like Exca said, we are not obligated to even HAVE a website!
So you're saying you don't care about people with disabilities and they deserve a lower/limited style of living than yourself? I think you'll find in Belgium there are laws regarding accessibility too.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder

The AmbiSquad website is a DJ Squad site wich requires that level of animation/audio/(and soon) video provided by flash.
Right, then you embed those components as Flash files - not the whole site. Why does the menu and text on the page have to be Flash? Surely you're not going to animate the text.

I can't even select and copy the text on the page if I wanted to. I can't tab to your input fields for the shoutbox. These are things which are even easy to implement in Flash.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
My personal opinion is that you could use some education in designing too, your MyBB logo for example or the colorpicking on your blog I would rather describe as 'not looking professional'. In coding you might be good (and you don't mind to mention that, as others here) but thats not all you know.
I think you fail to understand my point - so instead you go and bash the MyBB logo - which is designed that way for a particular reason - people don't leave it on there forums.

As for the colours on my personal site - wow, you've stooped to another level here. Of course, could it be that you just don't know too much. Has your web designer ever heard of contrast?

So you're saying blue and orange are unprofessional colours? I'll be sure to mention that to the multitude of sites who employ those colours - just so they know they're unprofessional.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
That's maybe because there's a problem with the system of educating in your country.
It's the same everywhere. You only need to pass to graduate.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
Where do you think the projects on the portfolio come from???
They all look like DJ sites to me - so I'd say they're your friends. Of course, If I were looking for someone to design a site for me and saw your portfolio, "the inspiration I got from my girlfriend" and the "Girlfriend policy" then I'd turn my head and look elsewhere.
quote:
Originally posted by markee
I did not mean to sound rude towards your work in any way, but want you to realise that there are other factors that you need to take into consideration when designing and coding webpages.
Bingo - and not just shut down the comments & criticisms made.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
Sorry but than I do not understand why your sig should be less disabled-friendly because I don't know any screen-readers that can read text out of images. After all they did not choose to be disabled did they? Then again why do we use emoticons? Blind people can't see any emoticons can they? But still we use them!
That is why in HTML we have the alt tag for images to provide alternate text for screen readers. In the case of emoticons in Messenger - you'll notice it has the "disable emoticons".
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
I'd like to see that! What about the music player (streaming mp3) ?
It is fine for content like that to be Flash/etc
RE: RE: New Website by Xeeder on 06-11-2007 at 01:44 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Chris Boulton
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
That's ridiculous, i know Americans are great in sueing other Americans for the most stupid things (see http://www.jodysgarage.com/lawsuits.htm) but that's just childish and not the way it's done here in Belgium. Like Exca said, we are not obligated to even HAVE a website!
So you're saying you don't care about people with disabilities and they deserve a lower/limited style of living than yourself? I think you'll find in Belgium there are laws regarding accessibility too.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder

The AmbiSquad website is a DJ Squad site wich requires that level of animation/audio/(and soon) video provided by flash.
Right, then you embed those components as Flash files - not the whole site. Why does the menu and text on the page have to be Flash? Surely you're not going to animate the text.

I can't even select and copy the text on the page if I wanted to. I can't tab to your input fields for the shoutbox. These are things which are even easy to implement in Flash.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
My personal opinion is that you could use some education in designing too, your MyBB logo for example or the colorpicking on your blog I would rather describe as 'not looking professional'. In coding you might be good (and you don't mind to mention that, as others here) but thats not all you know.
I think you fail to understand my point - so instead you go and bash the MyBB logo - which is designed that way for a particular reason - people don't leave it on there forums.

As for the colours on my personal site - wow, you've stooped to another level here. Of course, could it be that you just don't know too much. Has your web designer ever heard of contrast?

So you're saying blue and orange are unprofessional colours? I'll be sure to mention that to the multitude of sites who employ those colours - just so they know they're unprofessional.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
That's maybe because there's a problem with the system of educating in your country.
It's the same everywhere. You only need to pass to graduate.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
Where do you think the projects on the portfolio come from???
They all look like DJ sites to me - so I'd say they're your friends. Of course, If I were looking for someone to design a site for me and saw your portfolio, "the inspiration I got from my girlfriend" and the "Girlfriend policy" then I'd turn my head and look elsewhere.
quote:
Originally posted by markee
I did not mean to sound rude towards your work in any way, but want you to realise that there are other factors that you need to take into consideration when designing and coding webpages.
Bingo - and not just shut down the comments & criticisms made.
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
Sorry but than I do not understand why your sig should be less disabled-friendly because I don't know any screen-readers that can read text out of images. After all they did not choose to be disabled did they? Then again why do we use emoticons? Blind people can't see any emoticons can they? But still we use them!
That is why in HTML we have the alt tag for images to provide alternate text for screen readers. In the case of emoticons in Messenger - you'll notice it has the "disable emoticons".
quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
I'd like to see that! What about the music player (streaming mp3) ?
It is fine for content like that to be Flash/etc


Oh, sorry but this is getting ridiculous, you just wrongly understand me on purpose.

I never said someone deserves a lower/limited lifestyle than myself. I think you just don't want to understand what I'm trying to explain...  Off-course there are laws regarding accessibility in belgium too, but they don't obligate a DJ squad to make sure their website can be perfectly viewed by people with disabilities.

By the way... how shoud someone who's blind pass this required field to register on your forum?
[Image: image_ver.JPG]
Isn't this an accessibility problem?

Why does the menu and text on the page have to be Flash?
Because I want them to be, fair enough?

Why should you be able to copy the text? I could sue you for that! There's a clear '(C) 2007 AmbiSquad All rights reserved' text.
You know what? Let's al sue each other!

Oh, so you design a unprofessional looking logo to make sure users would replace it with their own logo? Yeah right!

Maybe I expressed myself wrong about the colors of your blog, I meant those colors aren't really attractive looking...
And yes, off-cource I heard of contrast! You took a look at my creations so you should know that!

I don't think you graduated in Belgium so your really shouldn't talk about things you don't know anything of.

I didn't knew any of them before they asked me to create them a website. I didn't even said anything of making websites for people, they just came to me an asked me to create them a website. Aside those creations you see in my portfolio I have 6 other requests for the same type of websites too (all people who I've never met before) so they must really like the creations don't you think?
Or maybe you just don't have a girlfriend that inspiring as mine.

I don't shut down comments, I accept them except for the one's I don't agree with.
All the reasons you gave me can easily be unified as one reason not to use flash. 'Usability/Accessibility'.
So actually you gave me 1 reason, what about the 9,999 others?

So that's why all the smileys in MyBB have the same ALT tag content '(Smilie)'. Wow, now someone who's blind can hear when a emoticon had been used! Fantastic! But... hey, wait a minute, shouldn't he know which one was used?
You see, your commenting on other developers work but your work isn't 100% accessible too!
RE: New Website by Chris4 on 06-11-2007 at 01:55 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
By the way... how shoud someone who's blind pass this required field to register on your forum?
An audio version. :)
RE: New Website by albert on 06-11-2007 at 02:12 AM

I'm sorry to say guys, and don't take it meanly, but this is pathetic, and when I mean this, I don't mean the content of the discussion, I mean the way it is discussed. You both are adults, act like it.


RE: New Website by MicroWay on 06-11-2007 at 02:34 AM

First of all, I really don't agree with the discution!
And, about the site, it was a nice job(Y)...

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
I don't shut down comments, I accept them except for the one's I don't agree with.
Don't want to fight, but about this, remember that the website was exposed to a public forum, as there are lots of diferent people on this forum, it's extremely normal that diferent people has diferent points of view, and of course, some of the ideas you will not agree with.... So, not considering then it's OK, but not shutt down the ones you don't aggre with...
Sorry about the way of telling this but: Who speaks what he/she wants, hears what he/she didn't wants...
;)(B)
RE: RE: New Website by Xeeder on 06-11-2007 at 07:07 AM

quote:
Originally posted by alby
I'm sorry to say guys, and don't take it meanly, but this is pathetic, and when I mean this, I don't mean the content of the discussion, I mean the way it is discussed. You both are adults, act like it.

I can't agree with you more, we're acting childish. We just happen to have 2 different opinions, lets just keep it that way and go on with our lives ;).


quote:
Originally posted by MicroWay
First of all, I really don't agree with the discution!
And, about the site, it was a nice job(Y)...

quote:
Originally posted by Xeeder
I don't shut down comments, I accept them except for the one's I don't agree with.
Don't want to fight, but about this, remember that the website was exposed to a public forum, as there are lots of diferent people on this forum, it's extremely normal that diferent people has diferent points of view, and of course, some of the ideas you will not agree with.... So, not considering then it's OK, but not shutt down the ones you don't aggre with...
Sorry about the way of telling this but: Who speaks what he/she wants, hears what he/she didn't wants...
;)(B)

Off-course diferent people have a diferent point of view, and I respect that. It's not really 'shut down' I meant, it's just that I like to give my own opninion on the comments of my work wich I don't agree with.

But lets start acting adult now, we both have a diferent point of view, so what?