Partition Help - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +---- Forum: Tech Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +----- Thread: Partition Help (/showthread.php?tid=76619) Partition Help by LoochTheMan on 08-08-2007 at 05:56 AM
My computer has 2 x 250 GB hard drives, but I only initially started with 250 GB. How can I add the other 250 GB onto my exsisting memory without creating a new disk drive? RE: Partition Help by Adeptus on 08-08-2007 at 06:32 AM
Your question is somewhat unclear, so I am just going to state what you can do. RE: Partition Help by LoochTheMan on 08-08-2007 at 06:34 AM Im thinking more of option one. I want to add the unused 250 GB to the C: drive that is currently using the other 250 GB. RE: Partition Help by user27089 on 08-08-2007 at 07:18 AM
You can merge the two drives, but the second drive needs to be empty, otherwise a lot of data can be lost. RE: Partition Help by ShawnZ on 08-08-2007 at 12:05 PM
quote: you're thinking of option 3. RE: Partition Help by MeEtc on 08-08-2007 at 01:05 PM
Just remember though, if you choose this setup and one of your drives goes bad on you, you lose data from BOTH drives. Making a spanned drive is a similar configuration, but data on one drive will only be made inaccessible when the other fails, it can be recovered. RE: RE: Partition Help by LoochTheMan on 08-08-2007 at 04:56 PM
quote: My second drive hasnt been used so it is empty. If someone knows how to do this definitively that would be helpful because I dont want to loose data that I already have or screw up my computer. RE: Partition Help by Adeptus on 08-08-2007 at 09:21 PM
quote:The problem with Traxor's suggestion is that you can't extend the boot volume, even if you convert it to dynamic. So, you can only do that if you have partitioned your drive -- you would then be able to exted the second, non-boot partition. What you could potentially do if you have a single partition is the following: 1) Create a dynamic volume on the second, presently empty drive; 2) Move all your data files to the new volume; leave only Windows and the installed programs on the first drive; 3) Shrink the partition on the first drive using some partition resizing software; 4) Convert the first drive to a dynamic disk and extend the new volume on the second drive with the now unused space on the first drive. The result would be one smaller volume for Windows and applications (let's say C:, 100GB) and one big volume for all your data, spanning both drives (let's say D:, 400GB). Many (including myself) prefer to partition their disks that way instead of single volume, anyway. If you do this correctly and nothing goes wrong, you should lose no data -- however, backup, at least of your critical files, is still highly recommended. Resizing "accidents" are rare, but not unheard of. Edit: all of the above assumes you have Windows XP Professional or equivalent Vista edition. XP Home doesn't support dynamic disks and I'd assume the lesser Vista editions don't, either. RE: Partition Help by LoochTheMan on 08-08-2007 at 09:37 PM
Lets say I disregard my request. RE: Partition Help by Adeptus on 08-08-2007 at 09:48 PM
quote:Start, Run, type "diskmgmt.msc", click Ok. When Disk Management console appears, find your second drive, which should show as all free space -- right click in the free space and create a new volume. I don't recall the exact verbiage of the menu, but it should be obvious. RE: Partition Help by Snake on 08-09-2007 at 02:28 AM
I'm going to assume you have all your files in the My Documents folder. You can format and set the new drive to another drive leter then go "Start"->Right Click on My Documents then change the path to the new driver letter. Of cores you would have to copy all of the "My Documents" folder over to the new drive. RE: Partition Help by Adeptus on 08-09-2007 at 04:16 AM
quote:As stated elsewhere in this thread, RAID-0 doubles (or triples, if you use three drives, and so forth) the chance of drive failure. The MTBF of the array is MTBF of a single drive / number of drives. Given the high MTBF of modern drives, it's still not a huge risk -- but it is a risk, nevertheless. The risk is usually taken for performance reasons, since good RAID-0 should have data transfer rate almost equal that of a single drive * the number of drives. quote:You only need one more drive for RAID-5 -- the minimum is considered to be 3 and theorethically it could work with 2 (but then you would be much better off using RAID-1). However, the more drives you have, the more cost effective it becomes -- the capacity of RAID-5 is the combined capacity minus one drive. The problem with RAID-5 is horrible write performance, which gets worse with the number of drives -- after each write, the corresponding data zones on the remaining drives have to be read (if not already cached), the parity computed, and the corresponding parity zone updated. Software RAID-5 (which includes most low end motherboard-integrated controllers) is pathetic and I'd not consider it if I couldn't afford a decent controller, with an adequate dedicated processor and a good amount of dedicated cache memory. RE: RE: Partition Help by LoochTheMan on 08-09-2007 at 05:28 AM
quote: I have an MDG and on the back of the CPU tower it says 2 x 250 GB (500GB)...and yet I do not see this second disk drive. Whats wrong with this picture? RE: Partition Help by Adeptus on 08-09-2007 at 06:47 AM
According to that screenshot, you only have one 250GB hard drive -- or, perhaps, two configured as RAID-1 mirror set on an onboard RAID controller. That pretty much eliminates all the things we've been discussing so far. |