The following message was not recieved script. - Printable Version -Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net) +-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58) +--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +---- Forum: Scripting (/forumdisplay.php?fid=39) +----- Thread: The following message was not recieved script. (/showthread.php?tid=78078) The following message was not recieved script. by Slyke on 10-09-2007 at 08:16 AM
Hmmm... i got this idea from the "Ignore" script that ignores a certain contact(s) when enabled. RE: The following message was not recieved script. by bigbob85 on 10-10-2007 at 03:34 AM
JScript isnt java, so dont worry. RE: The following message was not recieved script. by roflmao456 on 10-10-2007 at 04:05 AM i think someone said that "it's impossible" RE: The following message was not recieved script. by Slyke on 10-10-2007 at 04:08 AM
Hmmmm, couldn't it be faked any way (Without both of you having the script)? Like when you send those Built-In Sounds (But this way they'd need Messenger Plus too)? RE: The following message was not recieved script. by roflmao456 on 10-10-2007 at 04:14 AM if you have Stuffplug 3 for wlm (and actiontext feature on) then possibly you could try something.. RE: The following message was not recieved script. by Slyke on 10-10-2007 at 04:24 AM
Sweet, im going to have a look now. I also found this thread RE: The following message was not recieved script. by markee on 10-10-2007 at 05:09 AM
quote:You can't do it because you are not allowed to make an emoticon for the beginning of the message. Also to have colouring the contact would need Plus! as well (I think you can send formatted text). Unless you can work out how to block outgoing received message responses in relation to particular contacts then I think it will be almost impossible to do this (this requires VERY high understanding of messenger protocol and understanding of how to manipulate protocol though our own code which is hooked to the client - not easy stuff, even for an advanced programmer). You can reproduce something that may look a little similar but that is as close as you will get at this stage. Also, I know from my personal use, if I get that message I usually resend the message until it is sent or may report this irregularity on a forum such as this to try and grasp the reasoning behind it. I think you are just better to use the good old block feature RE: The following message was not recieved script. by Mnjul on 10-10-2007 at 05:22 AM
quote:Actually, I remember when the switchboard server sends the message to your computer successfully, it also sends ACK to the sender (it is not your computer that sends ACK. The switchboard server sends ACK as long as it successfully send the message regardless of whether your computer actually receives the message or not). Unless you're able to control the switchboard server to send an NAK, there probably doesn't exist a protocol-wise hack to accomplish this. I would want this to be done to trick some of my contacts too RE: The following message was not recieved script. by TheSteve on 10-10-2007 at 11:40 AM You could in theory modify the client so that if a contact is ignored, it will simply ignore the switch board session requests(RNG) which will eventually force a time out on your contact's end. Although this trick will stop working if you talk to them or someone puts the two of you in a group conversation. |