Shoutbox

quote:

---

Originally posted by WDZ
Check this out...

code:

---

code

---

code:

---

[i]code[/i] :) (this one uses [noparse])

---

[img]http://shoutbox.menthix.net/images/STFU.jpg[/img]

Should be useful, right?

---

Terrific great, DZ No more stupid Alt+173's...

quote:

---

Originally posted by WDZ
Check this out...

code:

---

code

---

code:

---

[i]code[/i] :) (this one uses [noparse])

---

[img]http://shoutbox.menthix.net/images/STFU.jpg[/img]

Should be useful, right?

---

well done wdz
let me test it:
[code]mmm[/code]
[noparse][/noparse]
[noparse][/noparse]
if i don't edit the post, it's all right

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mnjul
Terrific great, DZ No more stupid Alt+173's...

---

Or Alt + 240

quote:

---

Originally posted by WDZ
If I remove all the "&" characters after parsing the BBCode, how will you post "Testing & Trashing," or how will the board output < or >? Even if that problem is bypassed, there are other problems... in order to detect if a smilie code has a "&" in front of it, regular expressions would have to be used, and there's like 150 different codes that have to be checked... some people have 50 posts per page... you get the idea. :-/

---

you don't need to check each tag as i said, a regex that focuses on [&(*) and outputs [(*)
(*) means (*) as regular expression. so if i wrote [&offtopic] it would still appear [offtopic]
Get the idea now?

quote:

---

Originally posted by KeyStorm
you don't need to check each tag as i said, a regex that focuses on [& and outputs [
means as regular expression. so if i wrote [&offtopic] it would still appear [offtopic]
Get the idea now?

---

I was talking about the smilie codes too though... your & idea would be much more difficult to implement for them.

quote:

---

Originally posted by WDZ
I was talking about the smilie codes too though... your & idea would be much more difficult to implement for them.

---

Yes, that's reasonable... But... the & thing in tags is ok, isn't it?

Yeah, it would be possible, but I already added [noparse], so...

quote:

---

Originally posted by WDZ
Yeah, it would be possible, but I already added [noparse], so...

---

lol, I'm to tired to read the rest. Good work .