Shoutbox

quote:

---

Originally posted by blade
But look, it doesn't happen in IE :

---

Doesn't happen in Opera either.

I think Firefox allows room for a non-existent scrollbar, and as far as I know, there's nothing I can do about it.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Xero_Cool
in IE it works fine and btw, WTF do i have a orange background in IE? thats not how its suppose to look like. IE sucks these days.

---

IE doesn't support PNG transparency properly.

That bug is from MSIE, wich can't parse the 8 bit alpha channel from PNG.

Damn WDZ x2

Damn Bill (gates that is)..... FIX IE!

maybe convert your image to a gif...
thats a great extension..

quote:

---

Originally posted by Xero_Cool
Edit LMAO Blade. My sigs background is gray to you and orange to me  in ie

---

Like WDZ already said, that's because MSIE doesn't support 8bit alpha channels for transparency.

1) You can fix this easly by not using a 8bit alpha channel for the transparency. You sig doesn't even need to have 8bit alpha transparency, so why using it Not only will your PNG be smaller, but all the browsers will show it correctly.
size gained by doing this: 45.056 bytes -> 40.960 bytes

Actually when editing your sig, I've seen that you aliased the border to white. Either alias it so you do use 8 bit alpha transparency, or make it so that you don't blend to white cause this will look ugly on darker backgrounds...
size gained by doing this: 40.960 bytes -> 40.847 bytes

2) Also there are some leftover pixels in the "transparent" border which should be cleared.
size gained by doing this: 40.847 bytes -> 40.541 bytes

3) And why using millions of colors when you're only using 245 colors. That can easly be cropped down which will be, again, smaller, by using an Octree Color Cut (big term for "strip every unused color").
size gained by doing this: 40.541 bytes -> 18.651 bytes

4) And because many colors of pixels are nearly the same, you can even reduce that so that compression of the image will be better and the size reduced even more, by using Median Color Cut instead of Octree...
size gained by doing this: 40.541 bytes -> 14.688 bytes

5) And because I used the Median Cut Filter instead and because this is a PNG (which can store palettes in the order of 2^X), I can now use the Octree method to even further reduce filesize (only a few bytes though).
size gained by doing this: 14.688 bytes -> 14.680 bytes

quote:

---

Originally posted by DureX
maybe convert your image to a gif...

---

nope, converting it to GIF will be useless in this case as the compression of the PNG is better then the one from GIF (in this case)


Thus, the final (fixed) image which is much much smaller in size then the original one (reduced by 66%!), but will show like it should show in every browser:

- image cropped to exclude leftover pixels
- removed the pure white blending
- colors reduced to 165 color palette (with Median Cut and Octree Cut method)

You could even reduce the colors even more with almost no visible change to reduce the filesize even more.

For example to +-64 colors (rough reduction, so some minute change can be visible): 10.430 bytes

omg...

to Cookie, the 1337 graphics expert.

quote:

---

Originally posted by WDZ
omg...

to Cookie, the 1337 graphics expert.

---

Hahaha, blade its not a bug, its just one of the features of Mozilla Firefox, if you go onto weebl's stuff, you can scroll the vertical banner on the far right.

Although WDZ, in firefox you can't see the whole of saralk's sig and some other peoples sig's, but when you view this in Internet Explorer you can see it, its as if the height decreases when you use firefox, all I know is that its irritating..

Well, look at it as an extra height limitation then

quote:

---

Originally posted by CookieRevised
Well, look at it as an extra height limitation then

---

But surely it should be edited so that there isn't this problem, its preventing users of this forum from viewing possible masterpieces that they could see in internet explorer.