What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Skype & Technology » Tech Talk » The processor calculations thread.

Pages: (2): « First [ 1 ] 2 » Last »
The processor calculations thread.
Author: Message:
.blade//
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 2856
Reputation: 39
36 / Male / –
Joined: Jan 2004
O.P. Shocked  The processor calculations thread.
A while ago Cookie posted a program to test how fast your processor could do math. I wanted to see how my new 64-bit processor did in this test. Anyone know where this program is? (I can't find the thread :dodgy:)

This post was edited on 01-10-2005 at 07:30 PM by .blade//.
[Image: A%20Pointy%20Rock.jpg]
01-10-2005 07:28 PM
Profile PM Web Find Quote Report
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15517
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: THe processor calculations thread.
quote:
Originally posted by blade
A while ago Cookie posted a program to test how fast your processor could do math. I wanted to see how my new 64-bit processor did in this test. Anyone know where this program is? (I can't find the thread :dodgy:)
I have deleted the thread because people couldn't stop spamming the thread with useless comments and I was seriously fed up with it...

PI-calculating program: ftp://pi.super-computing.org/windows/super_pi.zip
or at mirror: http://users.pandora.be/ea/super_pi.zip
(note: this shows how fast your pc is in calculation, nothing more. So, for example your graphics card doesn't have any influence on this. It is well possible that your PC, compared to others is slower/faster in other things)

PC specs can be viewed with freeware programs like CPU-Z

This post was edited on 01-10-2005 at 11:01 PM by CookieRevised.
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
01-10-2005 07:35 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
.blade//
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 2856
Reputation: 39
36 / Male / –
Joined: Jan 2004
O.P. RE: The processor calculations thread.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
(note: this shows how fast your pc is in calculation, nothing more. So, for example your graphics card doesn't have any influence on this. It is well possible that your PC, compared to others is slower/faster in other things)

I know that :P


Anyways, I did the calculation to 16K and1M on my Athlon 64 3500+ at 2.42ghz. c

Calculations to 16K completed in under 1s
Calculations to 1M completed in 40s

:banana:

This post was edited on 01-10-2005 at 08:29 PM by .blade//.
[Image: A%20Pointy%20Rock.jpg]
01-10-2005 07:42 PM
Profile PM Web Find Quote Report
Mike
Elite Member
*****

Avatar
Meet the Spam Family!

Posts: 2795
Reputation: 48
32 / Male / Flag
Joined: Mar 2003
Status: Online
RE: The processor calculations thread.
My Intel Pentium II 233 mhZ computer beats you:P

16k: 05s
1M: 12 m 18 s

:banana:
YouTube closed-captions ripper (also allows you to download videos!)
01-10-2005 09:53 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15517
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: The processor calculations thread.
erm mike, I don't see how 5 seconds is beating 1 second or 12 minutes beating 40 seconds...
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
01-10-2005 10:35 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
*Saint*
Senior Member
****

Avatar

Posts: 570
Reputation: 25
36 / Male / Flag
Joined: Jan 2004
RE: RE: The processor calculations thread.
quote:
Originally posted by Mike2
My Intel Pentium II 233 mhZ computer beats you:P

16k: 05s
1M: 12 m 18 s

:banana:

i actually beat someone
Pentium II 400mhz
16k:4s
1M: 5m 28s
:banana:

This post was edited on 01-10-2005 at 10:56 PM by *Saint*.
01-10-2005 10:46 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
leito
Senior Member
****

Avatar
Chameleon by KeyStorm

Posts: 720
Reputation: 5
38 / Male / –
Joined: Apr 2003
RE: The processor calculations thread.
Pentium 4 - 2.0 GHz



16k:  under 00s
1M: 1 m 10 s

Does the amount and load of the processes currently running, affect the result?


[Image: leonelgalan.png]
01-10-2005 10:54 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15517
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: The processor calculations thread.
quote:
Originally posted by leito.gt
Does the amount and load of the processes currently running, affect the result?
yes
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
01-10-2005 11:01 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
Maniac
Senior Member
****

Avatar
Posts including T&T: 1684

Posts: 549
Reputation: 9
37 / Male / –
Joined: Apr 2004
RE: The processor calculations thread.
16K < 00s
1M
quote:
Originally posted by leito.gt
Pentium 4 - 2.0 GHz



16k:  under 00s
1M: 1 m 10 s

Does the amount and load of the processes currently running, affect the result?

Unless the processes dont use the processor... which would be strange :p

16K < 00s
1M   1 minute 23..... *ahem* too many things running.... i think.... hope
[Image: maniacsig0pb.jpg]
*It took Jesus 3 days to respawn! Talk about lag!* :rofl:
01-10-2005 11:09 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15517
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: The processor calculations thread.
I still have a copy of that deleted thread. Maybe I'll recreate the thread again, dunno, but like in other threads of that kind (introduction thread, other "listing" threads, etc...) spamming/chitchatting will not be allowed...

This post was edited on 01-10-2005 at 11:36 PM by CookieRevised.
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
01-10-2005 11:35 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
Pages: (2): « First [ 1 ] 2 » Last »
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On