What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Skype & Technology » Tech Talk » file encrypting

Pages: (4): « First « 1 2 [ 3 ] 4 » Last »
file encrypting
Author: Message:
DJKAL
Senior Member
****

Avatar

Posts: 800
Reputation: 14
34 / Male / –
Joined: Oct 2005
O.P. RE: file encrypting
alright never mind then - il just delete stuff i dont want ppl to see
"You don't sleep, you defragment!"
11-26-2005 11:32 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
Concord Dawn
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar
This is a loopy fruit.

Posts: 1203
Reputation: 16
34 / Male / –
Joined: Feb 2004
RE: file encrypting
Cookie, zipping files into an archive and compressing them are two different things. Zipping files is much more effective at reducing size, and if you have the WinZip utility, it allows you to apply a 256-bit AES encryption to the archive, making it hard for people to get at what's inside the archive. Compressing them without putting them into an archive (disk compression) is an NTFS feature. As mentioned above, it's not as effective at reducing file size.

[Image: CompressionCompare.png]

I know that .01MB isn't that big, but I was compressing JPG images, which is already a compressed format, so there isn't much change. But in any case, it still shows that NTFS compression isn't as good as WinZip(or WinRAR) compression
[Image: 7.png]
11-27-2005 05:40 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
Ezra
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar
Forgiveness is between them and God

Posts: 1960
Reputation: 31
37 / Male / Flag
Joined: Mar 2003
RE: file encrypting
Do considder that the encryption of .zip files is more easily brute-force hacked than for example .rar, but if you use a password with over 8 characters it won't matter much.
[Image: 1-0.png]
             
11-27-2005 06:41 PM
Profile PM Web Find Quote Report
Jhrono
Veteran Member
*****


Posts: 1791
Reputation: 25
33 / Male / Flag
Joined: Jun 2004
RE: file encrypting
quote:
Originally posted by Ezra


Do considder that the encryption of .zip files is more easily brute-force hacked than for example .rar, but if you use a password with over 8 characters it won't matter much.
Brute force takes ages :P
11-27-2005 06:46 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
Menthix
forum admin
*******

Avatar

Posts: 5537
Reputation: 102
40 / Male / Flag
Joined: Mar 2002
RE: file encrypting
quote:
Originally posted by Johny
Brute force takes ages
Just a few hours with a good automated tool when the password isn't to long and no weird characters are used.
Finish the problem
Menthix.net | Contact Me
11-27-2005 07:14 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
DJKAL
Senior Member
****

Avatar

Posts: 800
Reputation: 14
34 / Male / –
Joined: Oct 2005
O.P. RE: RE: file encrypting
quote:
Originally posted by MenthiX
quote:
Originally posted by Johny
Brute force takes ages
Just a few hours with a good automated tool when the password isn't to long and no weird characters are used.

dont think my family are rllly that arsed {or would no how to do it!:P} to break into my pc files
"You don't sleep, you defragment!"
11-27-2005 07:30 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
Ezra
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar
Forgiveness is between them and God

Posts: 1960
Reputation: 31
37 / Male / Flag
Joined: Mar 2003
RE: file encrypting
If you have a good tool and the password is not longer than 6 chars then it's a matter of hours :P, Good tools can get up to a couple million passwords a second.

[Image: attachment.php?pid=570496]

.gif File Attachment: zip cracked.GIF (3.72 KB)
This file has been downloaded 310 time(s).
[Image: 1-0.png]
             
11-27-2005 09:29 PM
Profile PM Web Find Quote Report
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15517
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: RE: file encrypting
quote:
Originally posted by Concord Dawn
Cookie, zipping files into an archive and compressing them are two different things.
Yes I know...  We are also talking about two different things here: compressing data and encrypting data. Reread the thread from the beginning ;)

quote:
Originally posted by Concord Dawn
Compressing them without putting them into an archive (disk compression) is an NTFS feature. As mentioned above, it's not as effective at reducing file size.
It is almost equaly effective! Especially if you compare it to the zip method; Both use almost the exact same methods of compressing. (hence why zipping is nativly part of Windows XP; it uses the same libraries) You might wanna study the technical compression algorithems used by Winzip (see the PKZIP consortium for that) and the nativly windows compression algorithems (look up the source for uncompressing packed windows files).

What you showed in your screenshots doesn't say a thing I'm afraid. The sizes shown there in the red rectangles are the normal, uncompressed sizes, not the true sizes on the disk after compression.

--------------

This thread is seriously going in all directions except towards the real problem/solution... Why do people rather make it difficult for themself instead of using already available stuff??????

This post was edited on 11-27-2005 at 10:25 PM by CookieRevised.
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
11-27-2005 10:12 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
DJKAL
Senior Member
****

Avatar

Posts: 800
Reputation: 14
34 / Male / –
Joined: Oct 2005
O.P. RE: file encrypting
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
This thread is seriously going in all directions except towards the real problem/solution... Why do people rather make it difficult for themself instead of using already available stuff??????
agreed!
il re-ask the question and see if anyone can help me then as it will be clear - maybe!

is it possable to passoword protect my 'my documents' folder using windows XP home edition.
i dont want to password prototect my whole user account as i liike the convenience of being logged in automatically upon booting windows.
"You don't sleep, you defragment!"
11-28-2005 04:04 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
andrewdodd13
Senior Member
****

Avatar
Oh so retro

Posts: 870
Reputation: 16
34 / Male / Flag
Joined: Jan 2005
RE: file encrypting
It's actually *slightly* harder than that to prevent other users from accessing My Documents, as I found out the hard way.

The easy way is to boot into safe mode and log on as Administrator, because this account usually doesn't have a password and can usually access all the files.

The harder way is to use a linux boot disk, but as you say your family isn't going to do this to check up on you :).

Basically, without a single-file encrypter, or XP Pro's builtin functions, actually *Encrypting* the files will be impossible. All you're doing is restricting access, which can be pretty easily circumvented.


P.S. Try:
Start -> Run. Type "cmd". Now type (replacing <user> with your username):
cacls c:\documents and settings\<user>\My Documents /G <user>:F

This should prevent even Administrator from opening the folder :).
[Image: AndrewsStyle.png]
11-28-2005 05:41 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
Pages: (4): « First « 1 2 [ 3 ] 4 » Last »
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On