Shoutbox

why would i call nanafreak gay

He gave me nice comments on my dog video and persuaded me to post the news

and yes i've not edited the comments only chris and andyman

* aNILEator passes the buck

Meh it'd be easy for plus tags to work use this:

Depends on what you want so ill give you  2versions:

code:

---

$wlm_plus_tags = str_ireplace('[b]', '<b>', $wlm_plus_tags);

---

^^ with that way you have to close it off with another line and it doesnt check for if they've left the tag open

however the next one does

code:

---

$wlm_plus_tags = eregi_replace('<b>\\1</b>', '\[b]([^\[]+)\[/b]', $text);

---

How would <b> made text bold ? What about gradients ?

No read what I said:

quote:

---

^^ with that way you have to close it off with another line and it doesnt check for if they've left the tag open

---

And just too please you:

code:

---

$wlm_plus_tags = str_ireplace('[b]', '<b>', $wlm_plus_tags);

---

make sure you do better than microsoft and fix the party emoticon detection

<) you can tell the difference

BTW:
If anyone needs/wants my help I will be greatfull to help
I will secure up the code as well and I can help in general.
Just PM me 

* NanaFreak slaps whoever did that fake comment on msgstuff around a bit with a large trout.

thanks guys for not saying that we shouldnt do it and thanks for your offer to help, we may need it later

quote:

---

Originally posted by the andyman
So just to clarify does it upload DPs as well?

---

yes your DP will be on our server so that it will be in the signature (it will be kinda, not the same, as what i currently have in my sig)

quote:

---

Originally posted by aNILEator
make sure you do better than microsoft and fix the party emoticon detection

---

hahahahha kk i will

For those of you wondering about text formatting and why we are not going to include it I will give you two reasons.

1. Plus only gives the first 129 characters of the Display Name and PSM and may truncate ending codes off.
   
2. Text colouring may conflict with background colouring, making it difficult to see
   
3. Gradients would require some kind of loop and would make for more server processing, enough of which will be done to generate all of the signatures.  We want to minimise this as much as possible to be able to allow everyone access to this facility rather than having it all limitted like W2M

This is one of the limitations that we realise and will talk about on our FAQ page.... maybe we should start on that sooner rather than later with all these questions....

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Nathan
Hmmmm,

I suppose I could supply a server, 2TB of b/w will have no problem

---

Thanks for the offer of the use of servers to those who have offered, (Dempsey and Nathan that I know of) we will just keep a note of them for now.  At the moment we are just going to use our current server a little while we just get the basics working, but we may come talk to you guys later about it some more.  It is really nice to know that we have your support.

Hmmmm,

I suppose I could supply a server, 2TB of b/w will have no problem

I had a similar project last summer. However it really does get big, and that was just the website part. If you have the time go for it, I know I didn't .

It was called Project BananaPhone of all names