Although I don't think you can understand my writings anymore, I am replying to show my rightness to this community.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
It was not me who went off topic with all sorts of things which didn't had anything todo with the thread's topic.
Definitely it
was you......
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
maybe I'm one of the few who still bothers to reply about that trying to let you understand that your posts quite often are like that and others don't even bother to reply, and maybe others let it show in another way, or don't wanna spam a thread with it.
In fact I am not willing to see people have replied to my bug reports or suggestions, it is enough for me that Patchou reads them. However if you reply to them, I wish you write some logically good things and show that you understand my writings.
Let members write neg reps to me, I don't care them. Also despite your understanding, people wanted to spam my thread on Forum&Website but I have reported first two of them, because they contributes nothing and tries to change the thread's discussion to boy vs. girl discussion. They do not know about the rules of this board and I am happy moderators are doing their job quite well. I think if you were moderator, you wouldn't split that thread in order to become obstinate with me.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
Then what are they (suggestions about pers. status resetting) doing in a thread about the on-top feature of the Event Viewer?
Ask it to yourself? "Why did I bring that suggestion to this thread although ahmetgns didn't mention to that suggestion in no way whatsoever in the third post of this thread?"
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
Read your own post in this thread again and read your post in that other thread.... Let's quote it:
You wouldn't need to quote that post of mine on that other thread, because I wasn't willing to bring that suggestion on that thread to this thread at first, I have linked people to the post which was sent on 06.2?.2006, which is the first times of Messenger Plus!
Live (I think I have mentioned this and said which was posted on the very early times of Messenger Plus! Live also in my second post of this thread, but you missed that line of text I think).
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
How is that related to the on-top feature of the Event Viewer again? How is that on-topic?
Yes CookieRevised. Why did you bring that suggestion to here? It is not related to on-top feature of Event Viewer? Please be consistent Cookie.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
and it is the job of translators to fully understand how features work
So you should know that, as being a translator, me too know how features work .
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
And if you say you take all things into consideration and test stuff out, you would also know that the countdown in the personalised status is only activated when you set your Messenger status to Away (and when you've enabled the pers. status window to pop up of course). When you manually select the personalised status, your Messenger status is _not_ immediatly set to away. This difference makes that your suggestion is useless and even inlogic. And even if there wasn't a manual possebility to set a personalised status then it should still immediatly set your Messenger status to Away since that is what the user wants. If he didn't wanted that, he wouldn't have selected Away...
I do know when countdown is activated. Maybe I know it before you test it now, I think you tested it before writing these here in order not to make a mistake again.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
The countdown is there to make it possible to define a personalised status, _if he whishes_.
Countdown has nothing to do in order to make it possible to define a personalized status there. If you want to define a personalized status, the window should be open, nothing else needed. I won't teach you why that countdown is there, you must learn it on your own.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
That is the whole purpose of it. Your suggestions regarding this will make the feature inlogic and very confusing (and not what it intended to be) and actually will remove this feature.
No, I can't admit that my suggestions will make the feature inlogic etc. etc., my suggestions will make that feature more useful.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
First choosing 'Away' as your Messenger status is NOT the correct way to do this.
It is thus currently and what I am suggesting is making it a correct way to do this.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
And of course your status will be reset to 'Away' again in that case since it is this status which you have choosen before the personalised status.
Yes. And I would like this behaviour to be changed to a better one, which I have suggested on February 2007 under that old thread and you have brought here afterwards.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
I wouldnt have brought it up if it wasn't mentionned ahmetgns, mentionned by you...
You wouldn't, you shouldn't but what a pity that you did it, although I didn't mention that suggestion in this thread at first.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
You did not say anything about prosponing the personalised status countdown until the window is filled in and confirmed before, in any post (and that is all there is to say about that suggestion, not the complete random stuff you throw into it). Everything you said before was completely something else.
quote:
Originally posted by ahmetgns
You have definitely confused my writings here. I didn't say postponing personalized status countdown until the window is filled in and confirmed before, but I said, let Plus! postpone changing status to Away if user enable "Display Personalized ...........................changed to Away" option in MsgPlus! preferences and attempt to change it to Away.
Maybe you don't know what I've just said or what you suggested yourself. You exactly suggest what I said: prosponing the Messenger status to be set to Away until the coutndown is finished or something is filled in and confirmed.
You don't know English and then say my English was bad. When I saw 'prosponing' in your post, I assumed that you tried to say postponing, (ahmetgns is checking the dictionary for a verb: prospone.........there is nothing like that word.) and didn't mention the wrongness about that word. But still you are writing 'prosponing'. Also I think every people except you who know English would notice the great difference between "prosponing the personalized status countdown until the window is filled and confirmed" and "postponing status to be set to Away until the countdown ends or ....".
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
1) this will not fix a possible bug in the on-top feature.
2) This will not fix the understanding of how the feature currently works:
a) if a window is on-top it IS open
b) if a window is not open, it can NOT be on-top
You are right here. But I couldn't find another beautiful, short word there. In fact my suggestion should be "Always On Top&Can't Be Minimized". As you see, this is very long for a small feature. Anyway
Don't bother to reply again here, also on my other posts. Because instead saying some sensible things, you always confuse my writings. I really really really really really can't understand how your brain works. I think every people is capable to understand my suggestions easily except you. You are always trying to find a mistake in my posts, but what a pity since you are writing them without understanding my point, you always make mistakes.
/ 
/ 
