Compatibility is a sweet thing |
Author: |
Message: |
Nagamasa
Skinning Contest Winner
Posts: 1842 Reputation: 30
31 / /
Joined: May 2006
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
quote: Originally posted by vaccination
And good God that installer is useless ¬___¬
Yea lol...and uninformative...I was like wtf? when I first saw it...
Joined this forum 6764 days, 17 hours, 43 minutes, 55 seconds ago.
|
|
09-06-2007 09:58 PM |
|
|
ahmetgns
Veteran Member
Posts: 1343 Reputation: 8
39 / /
Joined: Dec 2006
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
When I saw that installer, I liked it. I can't understand really what the problem with that is.
|
|
09-06-2007 10:04 PM |
|
|
Dragunov
Full Member
Posts: 140
42 / /
Joined: Nov 2004
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
Well I love the new installer and Messenger, but they better give it 64-bit support already (in final version there is gonna be a 64-bit installer) and the possibiliy to download the different programs seperately, so without the unified installer
- HP Envy 17
- Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
betatested: Atlantis, Troopers, U2XMP, Far Cry MP
|
|
09-06-2007 10:04 PM |
|
|
Menthix
forum admin
Posts: 5537 Reputation: 102
40 / /
Joined: Mar 2002
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
quote: Originally posted by Dragunov
in final version there is gonna be a 64-bit installer) and the possibiliy to download the different programs seperately, so without the unified installer
Where did you hear that (just curious)?
|
|
09-06-2007 10:25 PM |
|
|
Voldemort
Veteran Member
Posts: 3504 Reputation: 49
– / – /
Joined: Jul 2005
Status: Away
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
quote: Originally posted by ahmetgns
When I saw that installer, I liked it. I can't understand really what the problem with that is.
Yeah, pretty much everything is the other way around for you...
*All posts are a purely speculative hypothesis based on abstract reasoning.
Not my daughter, you bitch!
|
|
09-06-2007 11:04 PM |
|
|
Baggins
Full Member
B000ALFAZO
Posts: 387 Reputation: 13
29 / /
Joined: Oct 2006
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
pfft.
dodgy microsoft.
|
|
09-07-2007 12:47 AM |
|
|
aNILEator
Skinning Contest Winner
...in the wake of the aNILEator
Posts: 3718 Reputation: 90
35 / /
Joined: Oct 2003
Status: Away
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
quote: Originally posted by Patchou
Maybe then I'll follow the trend and release a brand new install suite for 32bit systems only
NOOOOO you whore!
TBH messenger being the resource hogging beast might actually need to go 64bit soon
|
|
09-07-2007 07:44 AM |
|
|
markee
Veteran Member
Posts: 1622 Reputation: 50
36 / /
Joined: Jan 2006
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
Well I'm glad that this was one release that I was a bit slow with. My hard drive is way too slow (stupid laptop) so if it is taking other people ages to install then it's not worth me doing it. I'm sure the messenger team is copping enough flack about this that they are going to have to do something about it and I'll just keep my 8.5B1 until that time.
Can anyone explain to me why Messenger is so bloated anyway? like I do understand that it has a lot of features just sitting there doing nothing but they can just be waiting in separate DLLs which aren't even loaded? I know it might mean that the nudge might take 0.01 of a second longer to start a nudge or something like that, but isn't it better to have less memory hogged so that you can actually afford the nice looking interfaces on machines on the lower end of the scale of the minimum system requirements. Just my 2 cents on it all.
|
|
09-07-2007 08:12 AM |
|
|
Menthix
forum admin
Posts: 5537 Reputation: 102
40 / /
Joined: Mar 2002
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
quote: Originally posted by markee
Can anyone explain to me why Messenger is so bloated anyway?
It's an IM client created by a big commercial company... it just IS bloated.
|
|
09-07-2007 08:25 AM |
|
|
markee
Veteran Member
Posts: 1622 Reputation: 50
36 / /
Joined: Jan 2006
|
RE: Compatibility is a sweet thing
quote: Originally posted by MenthiX
quote: Originally posted by markee
Can anyone explain to me why Messenger is so bloated anyway?
It's an IM client created by a big commercial company... it just IS bloated.
Well that's not a good enough reason IMHO. Because they are a big company, they should have more optimized code because they have more resources. I know that everyone's code can be optimised, you just have to look at any thread in the scripts forum to find a script that has been criticized for how it goes about something or the script itself can be optimised further but no-one has said anything.
I can understand them adding in other optional feature/programs, but why can't they then use the resources of the other, more specialized program when it comes o checking emails or something. I seriously don't understand how there is such little integration and lateral thinking in such a large, powerful and resource rich company.
|
|
09-07-2007 08:47 AM |
|
|
Pages: (3):
« First
«
1
[ 2 ]
3
»
Last »
|
|