What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Skype & Technology » Tech Talk » ssh, putty not flexiable enough

ssh, putty not flexiable enough
Author: Message:
Jarrod
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar
woot simpson

Posts: 1304
Reputation: 20
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Sep 2006
O.P. ssh, putty not flexiable enough
ok so if we discard all my other threads i'll just get to the point,    i need an ssh client that allows me to define every parameter for the connection, i need to be able to use a http proxy with ntlm or a user/pass, i also need dynamic port forwarding and it needs to run on windows,
i have tried
putty + plink and it doesn't allow me to define the http proxy, and i would like to beable to change it.
tunnelier almost the opposite of putty, it supports the http proxy but doesn't let you setup port forwarding from the command line
and i have tried conch from the twisted internet framework and windows doesn't support the crypt module
so anyone know of some really good ones?


This post was edited on 12-05-2008 at 11:01 PM by Jarrod.

[Image: 5344.png]
[Image: sig.png]

A.k.a. The Glad Falconer














12-05-2008 11:01 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-05-2008 at 11:01 PM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by ShawnZ on 12-05-2008 at 11:39 PM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-06-2008 at 12:08 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by ShawnZ on 12-06-2008 at 12:18 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-06-2008 at 01:40 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by ShawnZ on 12-06-2008 at 01:41 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-06-2008 at 01:55 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by ShawnZ on 12-06-2008 at 02:25 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-06-2008 at 02:28 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by ShawnZ on 12-06-2008 at 03:41 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-06-2008 at 03:42 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by ShawnZ on 12-06-2008 at 03:43 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by wj on 12-06-2008 at 04:58 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by TheSteve on 12-06-2008 at 05:41 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-06-2008 at 06:11 AM
RE: RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by TheSteve on 12-07-2008 at 12:47 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by ShawnZ on 12-06-2008 at 02:35 PM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-06-2008 at 10:25 PM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by ShawnZ on 12-07-2008 at 12:47 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-07-2008 at 04:31 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by ShawnZ on 12-07-2008 at 04:42 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-07-2008 at 05:18 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by TheSteve on 12-08-2008 at 12:15 AM
RE: ssh, putty not flexiable enough - by Jarrod on 12-08-2008 at 06:48 AM


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On