I haven't bought ink/toner since the days of single black/colour ink (Pentium III days)...
Replacing the ink costs more than a printer...why not just buy myself a new printer and make myself happy?
I mean, my Brother B&W laser lasted me six years, and I just bought a B&W Brother laser to take over because the old one was low on toner. xD
Yes, as for companies, those printers are much larger/better, thus more expensive. It simply wouldn't make sense to replace a printer that's fully working for toner, which would probably be cheaper.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
It's true that the average consumer doesn't print that much, and their printer will be broken or become obsolete*, before they run out of toner.
Really? In my entire life of probably 6+ printers, none of them broke ._. It was always that I ran out of ink