quote:
Edit/off-topic: 3333 posts, guido 
thx for noticing
quote:
Originally posted by Chrono
Maybe to implement the reputation system we talked about in this thread and the choice to leave a message about the user..
Urhhhh that's partly what I'm suggesting... but... people must have a reason to vote in reputations, so its reasonable not to allow reputations without text. I agree it could be optional... but still, I think reputations would be better in numbers and not in images.
quote:
Well yes, but I mean people can complain by saying 'spammer' or 'links to trojans' or something, not many people are gonna leave a comment saying 'I like this post'. Comments should be optional really, I'm happy to add one if necessary but mostly I would vote if people had been helpful and informative, etc., and I'm not gonna bother typing out that they were each time.
I don't think you guys understand the point of my suggestion. When leaving a comment, you are not commenting on a post, but on the user itself. When you change your comment, your positive/negative/neutral rating about that user changes. So you won't put in your comment
"I like this post", but you will put (positive)
"This user has been repeatedly helpful and nice to other users in several posts. Keep it up!". Then, if it... urh... posts a trojan, you can update it with a neutral rating, and the following opinion:
"Has always been helpful to users, but lately has been disregarding the forum rules."
/ 
