I didn't notice this thread. Well, if it's going to be labeled as 3.20 I really don't care. Usually software versions are more of marketing than features (look for example at IE 5.5 which should have been called 5.05). Anyway, with this I'm not saying that plus should be called 3.20 because it's a nicer number. I'm sure that 3 months of work deserve going from 3.01 to 3.20 (and also that will not produce mistakes between 3.01 and 3.10)