quote:
Originally posted by Jiggs
oh and by the way, i dont even mind if this doesnt get made. i was just commenting on CookieReviseds very silly behaviour.
You wanna know silly behaviour... start ranting against those people who:
1) started yet another thread about this while there are already 5446541561 threads about it
2) posted off topic posts in this thread
3) even when it was said that there were already other threads explaining this whole issue and that they should read them to know a bit more, simply refuse to do it (or be to lazy?) and call me someone who doesn't know what he's talking about..... I know I'm not always right, but seriously....
quote:
Originally posted by Jiggs
And most people use it to know if someone is about to message them. and it works very well for that. no matter what you say, it does.
There you go again....
ok, read carefully what you just have said (which is the same what all those other people constantly said)...
"They use it to know if someone is about to send something to them"
Now read what Segosa has stated:
"You can use it to MAYBE get a warning that there is a CHANCE that someone is going to message you"
There is a very very big difference between it:
1)
"They use it to know if someone is about to send something to them"
=> You can NOT know that as there is no garantuee that the notification is correct or not; it is and always will be a guessing game!!
2)
"You can use it to MAYBE get a warning that there is a CHANCE that someone is going to message you"
=> With this sentence it is a whole other purpose and meaning. Here it clearly is stated that the notifs are not usefull to explicitly know if someone messages you. The ONLY thing you would know is that a user did 'something' so that you got a notification. This does NOT mean they are messaging you. If you actuall do look at how the protocol works you would understand that those notification will be send in many circumstances. Hence the MAYBE and CHANCE...
That is totally different than what people have been posting constantly (which is "it works", "it is good", etc)
quote:
Originally posted by Jiggs
everyone replied to you saying it works well enough for them. that should have been enough. you then could have NICELY mentioned how the connect and disconnect is not reliable anymore and left it at that.
in that case see my first post, that should have been enough in the first place also... (in fact, I really thought it would have been enough. and I don't mean to stop the creation of such a tool, but to stop the serious misconception that people have about these notifications....)
I shoudn't have been posting anything anyways, people should've use the search button first btw so they would have seen that there are already 65716514 threads explaining all this.
/ 
