Shoutbox

quote:

---

sure and in the process you forget about all the other notifications.... Even the notifications of a truely openend windows but where the user does not type anything...

---

Yup. - I never said those other notifcations didnt appear now did i? I'm just saying how you can tell if someone did open your window or not, providing they typed.
If they dont type then obviously you cannot be sure they opened your window. But then would this bother you? You dont need to know that then. (though on that note, you dont need to know when a window is opened at all.. the closed notifer is more useful to me. but still the window opened part can be used to certain degree of accuracy)

quote:

---

Oh dude, will you loose those absolutely childish remarks already and read some posts for a change?

---

And you can stop being a hypocrite. You're also being immature about this.

quote:

---

Yeah, just as you can always perfectly guess when a notif is correct or not, you perfectly know what has been said in this thread without looking at it... congratulations... (you need to play on the lottery).

---

More like im sure i would of seen it first time of reading this thread. -_-'
Oh what was that you said about childish remarks?

quote:

---

Huston, we have a connection...

---

Again, what was that you said about childish remarks?

quote:

---

read the sticky thread on the forum about this...

---

Ah yes, as I mentioned earlier (i was unsure if things had changed since then) block checkers only work if the suspect is allowing all users to see their status. Though this is irrelivent, is it not?

quote:

---

1) it's present form is the form it always will be in
2) if it is not a reliable window notifer I feel to see how it can be used a s a reliable window notifier.

---

1) I never aid it was going to change, did I?
2) yea i worded that wrong. - What I mean is, although it gives false alerts, you can tell when some of those alerts are real.

quote:

---

the whole freeking point is that there is NO way to understand them. You can NEVER EVER be sure ALL THE TIME.

If there was a way to "understand" them, then it could also be programmed.

---

Did i say you could understand them ALL THE TIME? No. But they can be understood some of the time, ie when a user types. - To this makes these features useful.



RaceProUK, I understand you dont want immature arguments clogging up this forum. However I feel it still a good discussion, as we are all trying to make others see our point of view it is helping us all learn stuff about the reliability. Though if this thread drops down to simple flames and name calling then yes, i agree it should be closed. But for now I think it is ok?