RE: Which one, by the looks...
Ok, So sticking with SanDisk vs. Camnex (never heard of them btw)
Micro-hd based players are much more prone to failure and problems. That note about skipping is a load of crap just FYI.
The SanDisk has had great reviews and people seem to love it. It's perfect for MUSIC. Do you honestly want to watch videos on a tiny 1.8" screen? I watch videos on my iPod with Video Support all the time but honestly the 2.5" screen is on the small side for videos.
Now, The Nano is only thinner then the Sandisk, It's about 40% thiner, the other dimensions are almost identical (off by 0.1 inches). The Battery lasts longer and the SanDisk is going to encounter the same issues as every other electronic device with a built in non-user servicable battery. It will die at some point, iPod's have had more then their fair share of complaints because they are slightly higher priced and they have a much larger user base so there are more people to complain at the slightest problem.
And, the 2gb only comes in Silver, not available in pink (acording to apple).
Now I know I come off sounding like an apple fan boy here, but to be perfectly honest, I'm on my second iPod (sold the first one to upgrade to the video as it makes for great entertainment for my three year old neice) and I've never had a problem with it. If you dont like iTunes you can install iPod linux on it and drag and drop music on there like most other devices.
Now, for those of you spamming the thread with "iPods suck", Do it again and you'll be banned for the day.
"A towel is about the most massively useful
thing an interstellar hitchhiker can have."
|