quote:
Originally posted by NiteMare
quote:
Originally posted by John Anderton
Ok so if both of us think the other spams and if you rep me first, i should wait 2 weeks for neg repping you for a reason which may be legit and not a "rep back"?
yes exactly because if you truly do think i deserve a neg, then the 2 weeks will not matter, and will not change your desision
But why wait 2 weeks for something that i, imo,
should be able to do now?
I'm not abusing the system. Why should i have to wait
just because you repped me first? ffs thats lame.
Imo, if you think someone just repped you back , pm them and talk about it. If nothing comes out of it, just pm an admin, explaining your side of it (hopefully with appropriate links to posts if relavent so as to not increase their work too much) and they will do what they think is right.
If they thing you are right, the rep will be removed, else it will stay.
End of story.
Unless the admins (who are really the ones who are doing the job) have a problem with it, i don't see why the users should? The staff does a great job. If they miss anything use the
![[Image: pm.gif]](http://shoutbox.menthix.net/images/pm.gif)
button.
plz2not suggest repmods 
quote:
Originally posted by WDZ
quote:
Originally posted by John Anderton
Thats not right imo 
I agree, it's a dodgy idea...
woo \o/
/ 
