quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
quote:
Originally posted by John Anderton
So yes, we did have something before the big bang. Even in Dan Brown's book, his definition of something out of nothing is 2 particles colliding to give you some antimatter however you did need those 2 particles, didn't you?
yep, but that third particle comes out of the blue, it is created. By normal means it would mean it would already have been there (matter/energy is never lost, it is converted). So where did it come from.... "creating something out of nothing". 'something' like that..
So this is all under the assumption that our laws of physics might be flawed? The one I'm refering to is "matter cannot be created nor destroyed".