O.P. Bug- Messeneger Plus NOT loading after loging off and loging off...
Well. Today I loged off my account and loged back on (Windows account that is). I have the thing marked to force plus to load at windows startup. Well when I loged back on it didn't load msgplus...I'm using Windows 98 SE...I guese it's a bug...
RE: Bug- Messeneger Plus NOT loading after loging off and loging off...
If you used that feature then Plus! is in the registry in the run-section. IMO it is windows that doesn't perform the things in the run-section and thus not a bug of Plus!...
This post was edited on 09-01-2004 at 06:55 PM by CookieRevised.
RE: Bug- Messeneger Plus NOT loading after loging off and loging off...
Do you mean when you close msn messenger from the systray? because when you just log off nothing changes in msn messenger because its still open and it has no way to restart things:\ i dont know
RE: Bug- Messeneger Plus NOT loading after loging off and loging off...
The Msgplus process doesn't load. You have to start it by double clicking it in the program files folder and then restarting MSN to have it's effects in MSN. This is what I think is happening to sean.
RE: Bug- Messeneger Plus NOT loading after loging off and loging off...
right u probably have plus! loading in startup for all users
so if it starts up for the first person
when u log off it ends and then when u log back in it doesnt startup
i dont know if this helps but maybe putting plus! in startup for ur username might make it work
just a thought
RE: Bug- Messeneger Plus NOT loading after loging off and loging off...
actually, my guess is that it's in the local machine loading section. and this section is ran BEFORE logging in. logging out closes every process so plus! is closed too
O.P. RE: Bug- Messeneger Plus NOT loading after loging off and loging off...
No . Listen, I have one user account on this thing, I loged off and loged on and it didn't load plus. Therefor most likely a bug. I have the option checked for force load when windows start thing checked in preferences. Therefor a possible bug ?